Federal judge: ‘If you don’t like [Trump],” Get Out

by MaryAnn Martinez, KENS5.com  |  published on November 22, 2016

Federal JudgeDonald Trump’s election looms over a U.S. citizenship ceremony in San Antonio, as the judge presiding over the ceremony says if you don’t like that Trump will be president, go to another country.

“I can assure you that whether you voted for him or you did not vote for him, if you are a citizen of the United States, he is your president,” Judge John Primomo said. “He will be your president and if you do not like that, you need to go to another country.”

The room at the Institute of Texan Cultures Thursday night was a melting pot, a collection of hopeful faces now bound together under one flag. During the ceremony, the federal judge presiding over the ceremony talked about Donald Trump’s election.

He went on to criticize Americans protestors who carry signs saying ‘He’s not my president,’ including some in San Antonio. Primomo lashed out against NFL players who take a knee during the national anthem.

  • CharlieSeattle

    Yes, I garee! Leave and go to the Socialist Paradise of Venezuela!

    Cher and Madonna are both there now! They have a tent site overlooking a garbage dump just outside a military base.

    They get first pickings. Free BJ’s got them to the front of the line!

  • snowyriver

    Do you believe in our Constitution? Here is news for you…Barack Hussein OBAMA – SEATED BY FRAUD. Not a natural born Citizen (NBC). His father was a foreign national and British Subject and was NOT a U.S. Citizen. Obama was seated due to the corruption of the main-stream media and the willful complicity and negligence of Congress. Obama’s father was a foreign national. His father was never a U.S. Citizen, nor was he even an immigrant to America or even a permanent resident. His father was only sojourning to the USA attending college, first in Hawaii, and later at Harvard University in Massachusetts. His father was also deported to Kenya at the request of Harvard University due to his unseemly alleged activities there.
    Obama was born in 1961. Obama himself claimed he was born in Kenya for many years in the various editions of his pre-2007 biographical book. After 2007, Obama claims he was born in Hawaii, but no official hospital record of his birth has been produced. A PDF version of an alleged long-form birth certificate has been posted online by Obama but Arizona Sheriff Arpaio and his Lead Investigator Mike Zulloit argue it is a computer manufactured forgery. They also proved that Obama’s alleged draft registration card is also a forgery. The laws in Hawaii were very lax regarding registration of births. There is no independent evidence of Obama being born in Hawaii. Nor are there pre-natal and no post-natal records for his mother in Hawaii during his alleged birth month in 1961. None have been found. There are no reports of an attending physician, mid-wife, or paramedic called to the scene of a speculated home birth. There are no independent witnesses to his claimed birth in Hawaii. In fact, there is no record at all for his mother even being in Hawaii in August 1961, the alleged month of Obama’s alleged birth in Hawaii. No records exist of his mother being in Hawaii for the six months prior to his alleged birth date.
    To further contradict the Hawaiian birth story of Obama, there are many accounts by Obama’s paternal family in Kenya, Kenyan government officials, and Kenyan and African newspapers — that Obama really was born in a hospital in Mombasa, Kenya. Andagain, prior to 2007 Obama himself touted to the world that he was born in Kenya. No other president in history has had so many accounts attesting to his being foreign born and/or can provide no contemporaneous birth witnesses or independent evidence to corroborate their subsequent claim to U.S. birth.

  • Marylscanlan

    Google is paying 97$ per hour! Work for few hours and have longer with friends & family! !hz114c:
    On tuesday I got a great new Land Rover Range Rover from having earned $8752 this last four weeks.. Its the most-financialy rewarding I’ve had.. It sounds unbelievable but you wont forgive yourself if you don’t check it
    !hz114c:
    ➽➽
    ➽➽;➽➽ http://GoogleFinancialJobsCash404MarketNewGetPay$97Hour ★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★::::::!hz114c:….,………

  • Philomena

    Prager U: Immigrants! Don’t Vote for What You Fled | Truth …
    http://www.truthrevolt.org/news/prager-u-immigrants-dont-vote-what-you-fled
    Prager U: Immigrants! Don’t Vote for What You Fled … so they largely vote for biggovernment … Why is the United States so free, so much less corrupt, …

  • snowyriver

    Quite a Judge.. Yessir, believes in our Constitution.

  • Roy Fredrichsen

    I second the motion. He sounds like the kind of judge that will tell the truth and not any “Politically Correct” prattle from Washington.

  • Rob1911a1

    I am with you Dennis; that IS the kind of Judge we need on the Supreme Court. I thought that idiot Ginzberg swore to resign if
    Trump were elected; waiting for the paperwork now! What a replacement this justice would be.!!!

  • AKLady2015

    Wait, there will be brown shirts demanding “papers please”.
    The right-wing extremists have been planning for this day.
    Will Muslims be required to wear a crescent on their clothes?
    What symbol will Hispanics be required to sew on their’s?
    Just how far will Trump take his hate and bigotry?

    • Harry J Schaubel

      Don’t you mean YOUR HATE & BIGOTRY????

  • Bob

    Think he could talk to the over privileged, coddled, “every body gets a trophy” students who keep walking out of class and burning American flags? Perhaps if an adult spoke to them, instead of a do nothing educator, they might get the idea that, to Quote President Obama, “You Lost”.

  • Joanne Aulenbacher

    I notice none of them have left unless they are waiting for the Inauguration. That Joy Behar on The View is so filled with HATE for Donald Trump that she may have a heart attack. The one on their that is a Conservative is constantly being shut down by the others. I watch anyway just to see if they have any valid excuse for their hatred. He IS our President for the next 4 years whether they like it or not. They should at least wait and see how he does.

  • Loony tune

    Dennis McLain your comment is so true and shows you are a true American citizen and patriot.

  • Askjrsk

    He said it. Good thing not all Americans need to have a judge take us by the hand and explain the rules. Thank God we have a judge who has the patience to deal with stupidity.

  • Angelika K Griffin

    The judge is right, after all President-elect Trump has to enforce the immigration laws because no President before him was either willing to do so or just didn’t care so Obama thought he can just change everything to the point that we wouldn’t even have boarders anymore with his Globalism nonsense which is truly dangerous to America and the world around us, just look at Germany, it is HORRIFIC what Chancellor Merkel has done but I must say that she was influenced by this vile, evil person Barrack Obama or whatever his true name is…??? I believe Germany is lost and if the German people ever find courage enough to stand up and fight then there will be another war and whom are they going to blame….Germany….without thinking about of who has REALLY started it all, a person named Barrack Obama or whatever his real name his….We all have to EMBRACE our new President-elect Trump for not letting this happen to America…..

    • Askjrsk

      Glad we have a Donald Trump. Thank God.

  • Rodney Steward

    Love the man for this, lets just hope that the crowd he was talking to takes it to heart so we won’t have to throw them out!

  • Tiger

    There is a law from 1952 that many of these immigrants fall under. They are not here for love of America, they are here to take over America. Trump needs to use this law.

    https://stumpknocker77.wordpress.com/2015/12/09/4198/

    • Rodney Steward

      The very ones I’m talking about in my comment, Morning! 🙂

      • Tiger

        Hey there kiddo yes the very same. Here is an excerpt from Jericho777 on the net that put it out there. It was used to rid us of Communists of course today all the president would have to do is go to Congress and deport all the Democrats.

        “President Obama is illegally, Unconstitutionally supporting his Muslim
        brothers and turning a blind eye to Islam by violating The Immigration
        and Nationality Act of 1952.

        You can find it here at; 1952 Immigration and Nationality Act.. H.R.13342; Pub.L. 414;182 Stat.66. http://library.uwb.edu/static/USimmigration/1952_immigration_and_nationality_act.html

        In Section 212 Chapter 2, Prohibits entry into America any IMMIGRANTS
        belonging to an organization seeking the unlawful overthrow of the
        federal government of the United States by force, violence and other
        unconstitutional means.

        Those who refuse to Assimilate into our American Culture will create
        such huge tear in the Fabric of our Society that it will completely
        destroy everything we hold dear of this nation, and are why these laws
        and protections were put in place.”

    • Rodney Steward

      This is some good stuff Tiger, you are good at this!!

      • Tiger

        Thanks Rodney. I have been posting for nigh on 10 years now and finally got good at searching for what I need. It can be tricky. Working with my Congressman helps.

    • Askjrsk

      Right on.

      • Tiger

        For good reason and I remember Trump’s speech on all this and all the laws on the books he named many he had available to do what needed to be done. He is going to take care of us.

  • Tiger

    People are finding their voices now all over America and they are certainly beginning to do the right thing. Everyone realizes now that they can follow the law, they can enforce the laws and they can have true Freedom of Speech again. Trump needs to also take a really good look at the FBI with Lynch at the head of the DOJ, new Potential Terrorist List. Has nothing to do with Muslims and everything to do with Americans and what they believe.

    • Harry J Schaubel

      I do believe Lynch will be going. Whether it’s a boot to the butt that sends her 3′ into the air and 6′ down the street, or, preferably, to be fitted out in the most stylish of orange jumpsuits, is what remains to be seen.
      What’s the penalty for obstruction of justice on the Federal Level? That would be the 1st in a listing of her crimes against the USA.

      • Tiger

        Trump will let his new AG and the cleaned-up vermin from the FBI and CIA along with all DOJ, do their jobs. Yes there are serious things that Lynch, Obama, Hillary, Billy and many others did.

        • Harry J Schaubel

          And I was very shocked when the Divider in Chief who, with pen and EO, tried to Fundamentally Change America, actually said he couldn’t Pardon Hillary unless she’s been convicted. *someone pass me the smelling salts* This guy who has thought for 8 years that all he needed was a Pen and EO and his will was Law.
          For this one Bright Shining Moment, in 8 years of crap, I say “BRAVO President Obama!!!”. And I don’t believe I’ve ever given this POS that title b4. But he deserves it for this one act!

          • Tiger

            Don’t celebrate too soon. The scorpion never stops striking. Believe me his speeches overseas, where he was met with riots against him everywhere, was rants against Trump and a promise to continue to bad mouth him and do him harm.

          • Harry J Schaubel

            I know. :[ Just trying to find something to be uplifted about. It’s hard in a Liberalist World.

          • Tiger

            LOLOL well we got it going in our direction and two leaders, Trump and Pence who won’t let it backslide.

          • NM Leon

            Except that a president CAN pardon before hand. Think of the Ford pardon of Nixon.

            In fact, the president has the power to issue pardons in advance in effect. Covert intelligence operations are often covered by a “Presidential Letter of Finding” in effect giving the operatives an advance pardon for what would otherwise be an illegal act in a foreign country.

          • Harry J Schaubel

            I know he can and I’ll bet you a buck that HE knows it, too!!!
            The Presidential Pardon can be given to someone even under Suspicion. I’m just happy he’s saying he can’t! With luck, he’ll stick to that story.

          • NM Leon

            He might, rumors are that he is really pizzed off at her for losing and likely allowing his complete presidency to be effectively erased.

          • Harry J Schaubel

            *orders box of extra large erasers for Pres Trump*

        • NM Leon

          Except they said this morning that they aren’t going after the Clinton gang. I hope that’s not going to be true, it would be the same crooked schitte that Obozo/Lynch/Holder have been guilty of.

          • Tiger

            Actually Trump said he wasn’t going after her personally not that he wasn’t going to let the other agencies who already still after her do their jobs.

          • NM Leon

            I hope he does as he said during the debates and has his AG hire an Independent Prosecutor. Even if for political reasons he doesn’t want to actually jail her, we the people deserve to know the extent of corruption that was allowed by the Dem administration.

          • Tiger

            I believe that he won’t say no if they go forward with all this.

          • Tiger

            There are 4 ongoing investigations by the FBI into her Foundation and people affiliated with her. Congress is continuing also. Trump won’t interfere with them.

            “Hillary Clinton may have lost the 2016 election, but she
            will still face investigations into her use of a private email server
            and an alleged “pay-to-play” scam at the Clinton Foundation, according
            to Rep. Jason Chaffetz (R-UT).”

            “This is the largest breach of security, perhaps, in the history of
            the State Department,” Chaffetz said of Clinton’s alleged mishandling of
            state secrets.

            He added that the committee is still looking into dozens of people in Clinton’s inner circle.

            “We have perjury issues that we still want the Department of Justice to look at,” he explained.

            He noted that the questions about a pay-to-play scandal involving the
            Clinton Foundation and Clinton’s State Department is a completely
            separate – and also ongoing – investigation.

            Read more: http://www.thepoliticalinsider.com/good-news-congressman-vows-to-continue-hillary-investigation/#ixzz4QlUmslyW

          • NM Leon

            It will be at least decades (if ever) before we know the full extent of the damage she did to our intelligence assets by having a completely unsecured private server.

            Stupid is too kind a word for her and her gang.

          • Tiger

            This is true and she will get caught up one way or another even though the woman investigating the Child sex trafficking in Haiti was found with a bullet to the back of her head and they called it a suicide go figure. But with all those people someone might just go ahead and spill the beans. Plus the FBI gave everyone of importance when she was running immunity. Things are going to get hot.

          • If HRC does not get indicted, those who have done MUCH LESS should be released from prison-a complete pardon.

  • justinwachin

    If someone wants to enter our country they should accept the way we do things. If I wanted to live under the system of some other country I would move there. I don’t want to live under another country’s system and I don’t want people coming to this country with the intent of turning us into what they fled.

    When a person becomes an American citizen they should abandon their past country’s laws and way of doing things and they should obey our laws and embrace our nation’s way of doing things. America is made up of people from all over the globe who were willing to leave their old cultures behind and become part of the American culture.

    • Tiger

      My mother and grandfather came over after being interred in POW camps for the duration of WWII. My grandfather had been a Consul who ran an underground to get people out of Communist countries. He was banished to Siberia for it and that is where my mother was born.

      So they were registered and monitored for 8.5 years and the men in black suits came to our home monthly to check on my mother and they did the same with my Grundpa. You never saw two prouder citizens and the judge told my Gundpa that he knew more about America than most Americans.

      These immigrants today haven’t a clue and especially those who O has brought in. In 1952 a law passed related to dangerous immigrants and Trump has every right to use it and let us pray he does.

      • Askjrsk

        What a story! Thanks for sharing it.

        • Tiger

          Welcome, my father an American and so I was darned proud to be born in this country.

          • Askjrsk

            Proud to be an American
            God gave that right to me and I will
            Stand up for those who gave their life for me
            GOD BLESS THE USA

          • Tiger

            One of my most favorite songs. Amen

      • NM Leon

        Absolutely! We have restricted immigration in the past for many reasons. The idiot libtards just want no borders and world government (under their rule of course).

        • Tiger

          It is going to get really nasty all over the place.

    • Askjrsk

      That’s why we are here. The system allows us to work within. Best government going right now.

  • Rick D.

    I agree completely!! It’s time for these whiny elitists to step up to the plate and go to another country and see how they react to your blasting our government leaders. They’d be crying like little Bitch-boys!!

    • Harry J Schaubel

      Wait. They’re already crying like little Bitch-Boys.

      • Rick D.

        You’re right, Harry. I’d love for one of them to approach me in So.FL. and talk trash. I’d Bitch slap them so fast their head would spin. They’s be crying for their pacifier!!

  • Shaymamma8

    Wow, this judge is an effin’ idiot! Everyone who became a citizen that day knew that Trumpf is the president elect. I don’t know about you, but I cannot wait for the first mentally ill president and the first ho in the white house to ruin things. Remember, healthcare will also be taken from you goobers……

    • Harry J Schaubel

      Apparently the truth hurt you, or are you afraid he’ll take your welfare check and make you actually WORK for a living? Go get your cocoa and run off to your Safe Place. The crisis will be over soon and “Most” people will settle down to reality and learn to live again. I say most because you sound like you’d prefer chaos & anarchy.

      • Shaymamma8

        Never been on welfare, so I nothing about how it works. Why do you ignorant goobers always assume that anyone who disagrees with you is a welfare recipient? Damn, get an education!!

        • Harry J Schaubel

          Reading your above response: “I don’t know about you, but I cannot wait for the first mentally ill president and the first ho in the white house to ruin things.”
          Sure sounds to me like you lost something there… Unless you’re part of the new generation that’s never known discipline and even those coming in last get a Trophy.
          So yes. To me it sounds like you’re afraid your Welfare Check and other Gov’t Hand Outs are about to be cut off.
          If my opinion bothers you. TFB. Get over it. After that statement, nothing you can say will change my mind. Remember 99% of all the Media Anti-Trump rhetoric is over “What he said”!!! But I guess it’s only what Pres. Trump says that’s open to loose interpretation in an effort to find the worse possible meaning and BLAST the nation with it 24/7. Being a Liberal Democrat means you can say anything you like and no one can call you on it. Is this true?

  • WAP1102

    FYI . . .

  • WAP1102

    Any honest informed person must be impressed by Trumps work ethic, focus, and commitment. He gave 3 to 5 speeches a day during the last month of the election, and one on the morning of the election. Then he went right to work the day after his election and has worked every day since then. He has been interviewing dozens of highly qualified people for his administration. He has giving us a video outline of his priorities during his first 100 days. . . . All this nonsense about Hitler is ridiculous. As Hillary said, let’s give the President-Elect a chance to implement his plan of action. Even those who opposed him may be pleasantly surprised. . . . Trump is committed to the needs, wants and expectations of working Americans — not just the Elites, Entertainers, and Wealthy . . . and will give the USA first priority. May God and you bless him!

    • Askjrsk

      Amen

    • AKLady2015

      No, he sees what is coming.
      Telling people to get out while the can.
      The Fourth Reich issues are not nonsense.

      • Retired

        When are you leaving ? The swamp and Trailer trash are done controlling. Remember your state voted for Trump.

        • AKLady2015

          If you cannot support the Constitution please leave.
          Today would not be too soon.
          Were the names Castle, De la Fuente, Johnson, and Stein on your ballot? Trump only received 51% of the votes.

          The Electoral College votes in December. Congress will officially name the next President on January 6,

          • Retired

            Keep right on dreaming with you BS. Trump is your next President who is going to put you in your place at the back of the bus on the bumper.

          • AKLady2015

            Stow the insults. You impress no one.
            Where I live, First People outnumber whites.

          • Retired

            That you are not White has been determined a long time ago. Who are these first people you are talking about ?

          • AKLady2015

            Stow the insults. You impress no one. Your ignorance is published for the world to see.

            Arctic indigenous peoples include Nenets, Khanty, Evenk and Chukchi in Russia, Aleut, Yupik and Inuit (Iñupiat) in Alaska, Inuit (Inuvialuit) in Canada and Inuit (Kalaallit) in Greenland.

          • Retired

            For once you got something right, learned that in grade school.

          • AKLady2015

            Thank you.
            Your input is always welcome
            It says so much about you.

      • Rob1911a1

        AKlady – My Dad taught me “Never argue with idiots; they’ll bring you down to their level and beat you with experience”. Try learn the facts, and how to reason rationally, before you post.

        • AKLady2015

          Your Dad forgot to teach you something important: How to recognize fact.

          Apparently, you missed Trump’s attack on free speech, a Constitutional right. Even Pence knew enough to stand on the correct side of the law.

          You might want to do some research into Trump’s law-breaking and blatant, legally documented racial discrimination. DOJ has brought action against him ober 170 times.

          Start your research with

          United States v. Fred C. Trump, Donald Trump, and Trump Management, Inc. FH-NY-0024; Docket / Court 73-1529 ( E.D.N.Y. )

          • Rob1911a1

            The Democratically controlled DOJ: hardly a worthy starting point. As any billionaire can tell you, regardless of their politics, they receive hundreds of lawsuits PER WEEK, via bottom-feeding (usually Democratic) lawyers. If you’re going to cite these things as arguments against him (I note that there are no CONVICTIONS here), then what about the current (and other Democratic administrations, at the Federal, State, and local level) ‘gun control’ laws. These HAVE twice just in this century alone been ruled illegal (the Heller and Chicago Decisions, and the Chicago Decision not only re-affirmed Heller, it ‘incorporated’ the 2d Article of Amendment into the 14th Amendment, i.e., and ‘gun control’ is a violation of our basic civil rights. Where is your upset about that? Also, Federal Judges have ruled against Obama’s refusal to stop illegal immigration (which he is required to do by the Constitution, 1940 Federal Law, and 1952 Federal law – all signed into law by Democrats, I might add); Obama has refused to obey Federal rulings! As for Trump’s attack on free speech, where is that notion from? If you mean he defends himself from slander, libel, and defamation of character – all of which is happening now in the media – that is because the law does NOT protect such ‘free speech’. Quite the opposite, in fact. Bigotry, racism, all that is just so much nonsense. He employs tens of thousands of people of every gender, ethnicity, and sexual persuasion. Also, in your zeal to cite documentation, you missed the latest part of the case you yourself cited:

            Document Title Motion to Dismiss

            Document Case Name United States v. Fred C. Trump, Donald Trump, and Trump Management, Inc.

            Document Court E.D.N.Y.

            Document Docket(s) 73-c-1529

            State/Territory New York

            Document Date Dec. 12, 1973

            Clearinghouse Case ID FH-NY-0024 (View Case Detail)

            Clearinghouse Doc ID FH-NY-0024-0011

            File

            Motion to Dismiss

            | FH-NY-0024-0011.pdf
            So even the case YOU cite has been dismissed. Obama has broken so many laws (almost all of his ‘executive orders’ are OUTSIDE the law, i.e., the President CANNOT make laws with the stroke of a pen; per the Constitution, only CONGRESS can make the law. As for Hillary, well, her crimes are so vast, and so well documented, that they don’t even need to be explained. Having held and TS/SCI clearance, along with four other members of my and my spouse’s family, just HAVING the server was a violation of the Espionage Act; having classified documentation on it is a trip to the Federal pen. The (Obama) DOJ refused to prosecute and told the FBI director to back off; he, to his credit, when recently given MORE classified emails by the not yet corrupt NYC police, announced them just before the election. Since I have family at the FBI, and since it has appeared in DC newspapers (which you probably don’t read in AK), every attorney and every investigator recommended Hillary be prosecuted. Where’s the outrage about the Democrats, when there is actual factual evidence of their wrong doing (and I have even gotten in to the Clinton Foundation and the probable racketeering charges that can be brought there)? Again, try facts and reason, not ideology. It’s like I mentioned about the global warming nuts – no facts (the earth has not in fact more in any measurable way since the 1988 computer model – which is NOT science – supposedly predicted a sharp temperature rise); just ideology and cherry picked data. Get back to me when you learn to think. (Oh, and I have a degree in Accounting, a degree in English lit, and a minor in Biology; in the military with my TS/SCI I did classified (analytic) processing after graduated from Cryptology School in 1976; also tops marks in engineering calculus, which requires the utmost in rigorous analytic thinking). You should try it, rather than ideology, sometime.

        • ourzoo10

          That one is a waste of space..I block it, but it amuses me to read those commenting….LOL

  • Rock

    Zackley ! GTFO…………..

  • Anti-Unamerican

    Sir, Well Said !

    • Askjrsk

      Yes.

  • Name

    Finally, a common sense judge. Boy, are they few!

    • Mike Thomas

      Have you ever listened to Judge Jeanine Pirro or Fox News Saturday and Sunday nights at 9:00? Her, Hannity, Lou Dobbs & Greg the maniac are the only news I watch, all the rest are snowflakes, cupcake Liberal communists.

      • Askjrsk

        Absolutely! Limousine liberals we don’t need more of. Right on.

      • Name

        Yes, of course, I watch them as much as I can.

      • AKLady2015

        Maybe you should remember that George Washington was a liberal, So were all of the Founding Fathers.
        Don’t argue, read a British history book.

        • Retired

          Maybe that is where you should move to, you would fit right in with the rest of the Muslims.

          • AKLady2015

            U.S. Constitution, Amendment I.

            CONGRESS SHALL MAKE NO LAW RESPECTING AN ESTABLISHMENT OF RELIGION, OR PROHIBITING THE FREE EXERCISE THEREOF; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.

            Either you support the Constitution, or you do not. If you cannot support the Constitution, please leave, today if possible.

          • Retired

            You are just like the Democrats and Obama, you use the constitution only when it serves you purpose. You support the racist – illegals and Cop Killers

          • AKLady2015

            Why do you need to tell these lies?
            Why do you embarrass America this way?
            Why do you believe it is acceptable to lie?
            Why do you believe it is acceptable to repeat lies?

          • Retired

            You can not handle the truth about yourself. It’s your kind of thinking that has destroyed the US political system.

        • Rob1911a1

          AK – Yes, they were; when liberal DID NOT mean progressive/liberal/socialists! They stood for LIMITED government and FREE people who are above the government. That’s why the Sovereign States GRANTED the Federal Government ~35 powers; yet they have passed millions of laws, rules, and regulations for which they have no lawful authority. Whether it’s gun control crap, or ‘global warming’ nonsense, Donald Trump wants to DO AWAY with all the waste that’s keeping people down! (And no, he’s not a racist, or a bigot, or any of the other bull concocted by a corrupt media shilling for the Democrats). You do know, I hope, that ‘NAZI’ meant the National Socialist Workers Party, which is precisely what the Democrats of today are. “Those who refuse to learn from the mistakes of history are doomed to repeat them”, as the philosopher George Santyana wrote.

          • AKLady2015

            Actually, if you were to study valid history, documented outside of mass-produced text books, you would find that America’s colonists were very progressive, exceedingly liberal for their times, and very socialist.

            Of course, each of those descriptions are only valid for the time and society. Living together without benefit of marriage was a routine occurrence. Having children out of wedlock, a routine occurrence.

            Murdering innocent people — a routine occurrence. Stealing land from its original owners — a routine occurrence. Government required religion — in almost every settlement. Those who came to escape religious persecution, practiced it quite strictly.

            Please come on up to Alaska. We will be happy to show you the undisputable evidence of climate change. There are trees growing in the Arctic Tundra, which for centuries past has been frozen swamp. We’ll be happy to show you the open water across the Arctic, permitting ships to sail from the Pacific to the Atlantic.

            Come on up to western Alaska, we will show you the bare ground where there should be feet, not just inches of snow. You can visit our ski resorts which must manufacture snow to keep from going bankrupt…. Then there is the new breed of bear, the Polar-Grizzly mix.

          • Rob1911a1

            AKlady – Climate change is the NORM; it is never static, it changes from year to year, decade to decade, century to century, with or without man. The well documented ‘little Ice Age’ ended ~1850; so if temperatures are up a degree or two (and that’s all, at the most), it’s statistically meaningless over geologic time. The so-called ‘scientists’ who claim this junk do so for two reasons: 1) ideology, and 2) money. Virtually no scientific grants are available to those who decry ‘man made climate change’; almost all grant money goes to PROPONENTS of this junk, and scientists have to fight for grants. As for local happenings, they are just that – local. Besides, as Vladimir Putin noted, it would BENEFIT Russia if the temperature goes up two to three degrees. By the way, it is well documented that the earth’s temperature swings from 2 to 5 degrees warmer and cooler every 1500 years. Archaeologists have for decades known about this cycle (Dansgaard–Oeschger event); ice core data from both Greenland and Antarctica (which has gotten COLDER, and the ice pack has gotten DEEPER, in recent years) show this 1500 year cycle, both during glaciation events as well as during interglacial periods such as we are in now.

          • AKLady2015

            I suggest that you do not talk down to people who you do not know, let alone someone who actually witnesses climate change take place.

            Your statement assumes the current changes are part of the norm, howeveer, science and climate records say something very different.

            By the way, my recently deceased husband was one of the scientists assigned to the U.S. Coast Guard Cutters who traveled to the Arctic and Antartic to take those samples you are refering to.

            I hate to burst ypur bubble, but the Dansgaard–Oeschger events
            theory is not the only one out there. You need to also look at the Bond events. Then therw is the Antarctic Isotope Maxima.

          • Rob1911a1

            AKlady – Buy it’s ok for YOU to talk down to others?! You did not actually address ANY of the facts that I presented; the Dansgaard–Oeschger events may be one of many theories out there; but it was there LONG before the invention of ‘man made global warming’ in 1988 by an environmental extremist (James Hansen, who by the way is not a climatologist or meteorologist) simple wrote a computer program. It contained no actual scientific data or anything else; he merely chose parameters that suited his desired outcome. Worse, during the period between 1940 and 1975 winters in the northern hemisphere were so severe that many ‘environmentalists’ (INCLUDING JAMES HANSEN) were predicting the ‘coming ice age’. In fact the cover story of an April 1975 issue of Newsweek was: “The Coming Ice Age”. There, Hansen and others were proposing ways to prevent the next ice age; yet only 13 years later he is inventing ‘man made global warming’. If you cannot see the dichotomy here you are missing something. I am sorry for the loss of you husband (unfortunately mine is still around! LOL); but, you do not suggest that he was a scientist involved in examining these ice cores. My statement still stands: ~1500 years of a 3 to 5 degrees is a cycle that is repeated over and over for at least 900,000 years according to said ice cores, both during glaciations and inter glaciations. This can be found in Dr. S. Fred Singer’s book “Global Warming Every 1500 Years” (Professor Emeritus from UVA, father of the modern weather satellite, perhaps the most senior and one of fewer than 100 people in America who actually has a doctorate in climatology or meteorology). Most of the ‘scientists’ who push this stuff are NOT trained in this; they are in it for the grant money or ideology. Again, changes in local climate like yours are just that; local. Funny, I remember hearing how Polar bears were endangered; in fact there are now FIVE times as many as there were in 1970, according to both Alaskan and Canadian Wildlife Departments. Of course they are mating with brown bears; there are so many of them that they have expanded there range. Also, as I mentioned in a previous post, the climate changes by year, decade, century, millennia, and aeon. It is NEVER static, it is always fluctuating. Any current fluctuations are not CAUSALLY related to anything mankind does. This is the key argument; despite their claims, the environmentalists have never shown a causal relationship between man’s activities and climate change. Since the climate change is well WITHIN the norm, statistically, they really have no leg to stand on. Seriously, Dr. S. Fred Singer’s book “Global Warming – Every 1500 Years” is an excellent read and full of factual data. Haven’t you ever noticed that those serious climate change never present meaningful facts and data? For example, since 1988, has the Earth’s average temperature changed much? If so, how much? They never say; they just make wild claims; for example, sea levels are 8″s higher than they were a century ago (just a bit more than the length of a dollar bill). That, in geologic time, is a meaningless amount. During the ‘little Ice Age’ from ~1300 to 1850 it was not surprising lower; again, statistically meaningless. Did you know that in the first report to the UN Global Climate Change Panel (I forget its official title) presented in 1993, with over 400 scientists having worked on it, the huge volume included a precis (since the UN people are not scientists with the ability to assess the huge amount of data and analysis) that very clearly stated that no connection had NOT been found! This was changed by a Gore acolyte to read the opposite! Here in VA a (former) professor at UVA (Dr. Mann) presented in 2000 his so-called ‘hockey stick’ chart showing the 1990’s as the warmest decade ever! The National Academy of Sciences (hardly a bastion of conservative thought) thoroughly discredited his graph in 1993! He had to leave UVA and went to a school in PA. The former AG in VA actually tried to sue him for fraud (that’s how badly he had misrepresented temperatures) while collecting a full Professor’s salary and benefits from we taxpayers. In 2009, when Russian hackers did us all the favor of hacking into the East Anglia Project (a Brit environmental extremist site) and released a huge pile of emails, including those that showed he knowingly misrepresented the data to advance their ideology. I am not trying to ‘talk down’ to anyone; I just want to see rational scientific analysis, not someone’s ideology.

          • AKLady2015

            Blah, blah, blah, lie, insult …repeat ad nauseam.
            Tedious, boring, repetitive …

          • Rob1911a1

            What lies? Basically, since you know nothing concerning the subject, you cannot respond intelligently. So, you resort to simplistic ad hominem attacks. Everything here comes from well researched scientific publications. By the way, you called the Dansgaard–Oeschger theory; it is not a theory, it is called an event because it has been well documented by archaeologists from many countries all over the world, and long predates this global warming, which is still not supported by any evidence. As for talking down to someone, I have gone way out of my way and taken portions of my time to present factual information. Science and the data do NOT support a causal relationship between man and any changes in climate, which, as noted before, is never static and always changes. So the Bond events are now considered a 1,000 year event vice 1,500 years. First, it applies to a region, not the earth as a whole. Next, regardless of the time frame, it supports what I have stated. Fluctuations are norm! Same with the Antarctic Isotope Maxima. It simply reinforces the nature of change. Discussions of the hows and why’s of change in are independent of human activity. You are probably unaware of this, but there are roughly only 92 people in America with a PH.D in either meteorology or climatology; most of the so-called scientists making claims are not in these disciplines. That does not make them necessarily unqualified, but the people with the best credentials do not support this. Dr. S. Fred Singer, the founder of the weather channel (who called global warming the biggest hoax in man’s history, as I noted before). Also, according to NASA, earth’s temperature has changed 1.4 degrees F since 1880! Given that the well-documented ‘little ice age’ ended ~1850, 1.4F is not anything substantial; again, as stated before, well within the normal range of temperature variations. You should be know have noticed that I go out of my way to provide factual material, rational thought, and invest the time in doing it. Your response was unnecessarily insulting; just read the data, and then come up with VALID data and reasoning as a counterpoint.

          • AKLady2015

            Dansgaard–Oeschger ocillations are a hydrodynamic theory. Some scientists say that the events occur quasi-periodically with a recurrence time being a multiple of 1,470 years, but this is debated

            The best evidence for Dansgaard–Oeschger theory remains in the Greenland ice cores

            Oh, and by the way, Relativity is still a theory.

            Let’s not forget Einstein’s Static Universe …

          • Rob1911a1

            A ‘theory’ is the scientific explanations for an observed fact or series of facts or phenomena. It is not speculative; that would be a hypothesis. Next, Dansgaard-Oeschger EVENTS are called that, events; they are not speculative, just observed phenomena. A theory of why these events occur would be as I said: a scientific explanation of an observed phenomena. Relativity theory has been proven time and again, just as the Dansgaard-Oeschger events have been observed time and again. Of course the events, and their time periodicity, and their causes, are debated; that is how real science works. The fact that the so-called global warming theorists will brook no debate -literally, they have refused to debate those who have a different scientific view point – is an attitude which is completely unscientific. The real key point here is that various scientific disciplines, from archaeology to geology to palynology, show that the earth’s temperatures undergo both large scale swing’s (ice ages) and smaller 3-5 degree swings, warmer and cooler, as has happened just in the last few thousand years of recorded history. Most happened long before human activity of the sort we have now. Equally important, you neglected the fact that NASA itself has found a total of only 1.4 degrees Fahrenheit rise in Earth’s temperature since 1880! And at least one degree of that came before 1940 (the 1930’s were the warmest decade on record). Again, winters in the northern hemisphere were so severe from 1940 to 1975 that environmentalists (including James Hansen) were warning about the coming ice age! Yet only 13 years later, in 1988, Hansen writes a computer program (zero scientific application) showing the earth is going to warm up 10 degrees in the next century! Pure fantasy. Since 1988, it rose the other .4 degrees, an amount so tiny as to be statistically meaningless. As always such tiny amounts are well within the statistical norm for century by century temperatures. (For example, temperatures taken at West Point since it was founded in 1823 show a constant downward trend). Paris is the city with the longest record of temperature observations, since they started in the late 1700s. A graph shows up and down swings of a degree or two every year, but the basic temperature with which the graph starts shows virtually no difference in sum over the last 220 years.

          • Mary Clements

            In reference to the part about marriage, many settlements didn’t have clergy to marry couples or anyone who had the authority to do so. Therefore they developed customs that signified a marriage that was witnessed by the community until an official could perform one.
            Also the murder of innocents and taking of others land was practiced by Native Americans as well as slavery. BTW if you haven’t noticed, much what you have described is still going on in the world today. Notably countries in Africa and the Middle East

        • Mary Clements

          Why would an American want to read about American History in a British history book? Besides what passes for American history now is a revised leftist version.

          • AKLady2015

            Well, Mary, it is like this:

            There are two sides to every story, even war stories.

            Also, text books and history classes are limited to what detail they can present — time and space.

            Revised leftist? Try more historically correct, based on factual evidence and archeologic discoveries.

          • Mary Clements

            I would appreciate knowing where you have gotten your information from.

          • AKLady2015

            You have an Internet connection. There is excellent historical data available, however, you must verify the reliability of thw web site providing the data.

            Another source of material is public libraries. Some universities also allow public access to their libraries.

            I was privileged to have been provided a very good education

          • Retired

            AK just likes to spew BS and never gives straight answers, just likes to stir things up with BS.

        • Congilio

          Go back to school and take the course on American History. As you talk the talk but you talk the lie. George Washington was an Independent NOT liberal.

          • AKLady2015

            Go back and take a course on British History — George Washington was a criminal. POINT: Opinion is not fact.

          • Retired

            Who cares about British History, they were run by the Church. That is why our Constitution was set up that no Church body runs the country. It’s you yahoos that want to destroy what was written over 200 years ago.

          • Mary Clements

            I have noticed that AK does like to reference British History instead of American. Perhaps she’s British and that’s where she got her excellent education?

          • Retired

            She is a computer troll , Anti religion and supports the demonstrators along with the property looters. She brings up the Constitution parts that fit her and not the whole thing. She is like many preachers that only dwell on certain parts of the Bible.

          • AKLady2015

            Thank you.
            Your input is always welcome
            It says so much about you.

          • Congilio

            I do believe that I live in the United States. Now why would I want to do that knowing that the Brit’s are so stupid. Which reminds me, your also stupid. You need to get off of here and leave these good people alone.

          • AKLady2015

            Why?
            Knowledge is power.
            Francis Bacon

          • Retired

            AK > is a anti US troll.

    • Askjrsk

      They could all be like Ruth Ginsburg. No wonder her son has his face and body marked up with tattoos and piercings and a bone through his nose. Thank Hod for a common sense judge that can explain primary grade civics to those who need it.

  • Irene Elizabeth Grooms

    YES YES he is so RIGHT. Maybe Trump will put some one there that is like this judge.

  • Scott Harrington

    You cannot tell anyone they need to leave America. If the judge doesn’t like that, he needs to leave America and go to Nazi Germany. Saudi Arabia, where they have fascists.

    • MikeS

      That is babble. He can certainly say that. And, he is right in doing so.

    • Frank629

      no sir the FASCISTS are here in our country and they preside on the left starting with obama on down .You all can leave no one will stop you in fact i and 10’s of million of others HOPE you all do so.

    • Name

      Look who’s talking and defending the Nazi left! Did you miss the Project Veritas revelations? Do you feel sorry that the voter fraud machine of the left didn’t win?
      http://www.breitbart.com/2016-presidential-race/2016/10/18/commit-voter-fraud-massive-scale-part-ii-project-veritas-investigation-clinton-network/

    • used_to_be_a_liberal

      What the hell do you think the left is all about, you must think that “liberal” means LIBERAL, it means no such thing. “liberal” or progressive liberal is just a cover term for Nazi Style Socialism. If you think that is a false statement, then go do some research.

    • bytheway4

      Scott, when Obama has told you that you must except his illegals in America, you did it. When he took God out od America , you went along with him. When he took the Prayer Day out and has the muslim day, you said ok whatever. He stopped the saying ” Merry Christmas”, you said “if you say so, Obama my “lord” Now you complain about a judge that is telling you the truth? You are one sick idiot.

    • Harry J Schaubel

      No. He just gave them an option. If they can’t accept facts and continue acting like spoiled children, which is exactly what they are, then someone needs to say something. He was talking TO these newly made citizens, but he was talking ABOUT the Rioters.
      BTW. There IS NO NAZI GERMANY anymore and I’m pretty sure that the citizens of Germany would be highly upset if not enraged at you referring to their country as NAZI GERMANY! And if you actually READ what he said you’ll see that he didn’t TELL anyone to leave! To quote him:
      “He will be your president and if you do not like that, you need to go to another country.”
      These Spoiled Children who have caused over $1 million in damage, need to straighten up or get out! Chanting “He’s Not My President” BULLSHIT. He “IS” your president and if you don’t like it, then don’t let us hold you back while you GTFO!

  • Danang

    Right on JUDGE!

  • Dennis McLain

    This is the kind of judge you need on the Supreme Court!!!!

    • Tiger

      People are speaking up for the right now. They are awakening to a new day and they truly have Freedom of Speech again. O the Tyrant and Dictator is gone along with his crony Lynch and Comey etc. It is over.

      • AKLady2015

        Freedom of speech? In your imagination. Wait, the best is yet to come. What you have done will cme home to roost the first time someone stops you an demands “Papers”.

        • Retired

          Mary — Better start getting your papers in order, Alaska will be one of the states looking for people like you.

          • AKLady2015

            They don’t have to look.

            I am in their face and in their law books.
            I usually present at least one, if not two cases a month.

            Mary. Mary quite contrary. Is the use of a factitious name supposed to be a threat of some type?

          • Retired

            Now you are really going overboard with the BS. Just one of the many names you post under I guess.

          • AKLady2015

            They don’t have to look.
            I am in their face and in their law books.

          • Retired

            Most anti Americans like you would be .

        • Rob1911a1

          AKLADY – You never seem to ‘get it’; it’s the liberal/progressive/democrats who are the NAZIs. It is Trump and his supporters who stand for freedom and the law. The fact that you literally cannot take facts at face value means you are unfit to live here. Try Cuba, where they really DO stop and ask for your papers!

        • It’s fine with me, I have legal papers, so ask me, stop me and ask me … I don’t mind a little inconvenience to help protect our American way of life.

          • Retired

            People who have something to hide are afraid to be stopped , like the cop killers roaming the streets along with the Demonstrators.

          • AKLady2015

            No, it is not compatible with the U.S. Constitution.

          • AKLady2015

            Freedom od movement is a Constitutional right.

            Freedom of movement, mobility rights, or the right to travel is a human rights concept encompassing the right of individuals to travel from place to place within the territory of a country, and to leave the country and return to it.

            Suggest you read:

            Corfield v. Coryell, 6 Fed. Cas. 546 (1823),
            Paul v. Virginia, 75 U.S. 168 (1869),
            Ward v. Maryland, 79 U.S. 418 (1871).
            United States v. Harris, 106 U.S. 629 (1883).

            There are many United States citizens who cannot provide “paper”. They are people born at home, without a doctor or midwife present. Their births are never registered. That situtation takes place everday in rural, impoverished America; mostly in them there “Red” States.

        • WhiteFalcon

          If I NEED papers, I will have papers, but I don’t. If I were in a foreign country, I would need papers, which is as it should be. If I were there and over stayed my visa or was there in some other illegal manner, I would seek out a way to become legal, and if that were not possible, I would leave and use the proper and legal way to return, which is as it should be.

      • Marylscanlan

        Google is paying 97$ per hour! Work for few hours and have longer with friends & family! !hz114c:
        On tuesday I got a great new Land Rover Range Rover from having earned $8752 this last four weeks.. Its the most-financialy rewarding I’ve had.. It sounds unbelievable but you wont forgive yourself if you don’t check it
        !hz114c:
        ➽➽
        ➽➽;➽➽ http://GoogleFinancialJobsCash404MarketNewGetPay$97Hour ★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★::::::!hz114c:….,……..

      • col

        Not until Inauguration Day in Jan. Obama is still presiding until then. He has plenty of time to do a lot of bad things before then. Including calling to Marshall Law which would keep Trump from becoming our president. Obama is just the kind of person to pull a trick like that. I wouldn’t put any thing past him

        • Tiger

          No he can’t keep Trump from becoming our president. The election is over. O will continue to try as will all his minions but already Soros saying he will give millions to stop the violence when it is him causing it along with the DNC and Hillary and O. We have laws on the books concerning inciting violence and Soros no dummy he knows Trump is in.

          As to Martial Law nobody is fighting back, the only people rioting are his people. So anyone picked up etc would be his own and he isn’t going to do that. Yes he will do all he can with the time he has left.

  • Patriot159

    I LOVE THIS GUY!!

Google Analytics Alternative