Federal judge rules Jeff Sessions cannot withhold funds from sanctuary cities

by
September 16, 2017

Jeff-SessionsAttorney General Jeff Sessions’ attempt to withhold federal grant money from so-called sanctuary cities has been blocked by a federal judge.

On Friday, U.S. District Judge Harry Leinenweber in the Northern District of Illinois ruled in favor of the city of Chicago in its request for a preliminary injunction against Session’s conditions for Edward Byrne Memorial Justice Assistance Grants.

The ruling will now apply to sanctuary jurisdictions nationwide.

“The court finds that the city has established that it would suffer irreparable harm if a preliminary injunction is not entered,” Leinenweber said in his order, adding the injunction is “nationwide in scope” because there is “reason to think that the legal issues present in this case are restricted to Chicago.”

  • elmcqueen3

    The Judge is probably a current member of the ACLU…which is stacked to the gills with activist Jewish attorneys…most of em are anti-American “communist”.
    commieblaster.com

  • roboteq

    It is a sad state of affairs when cities that refuse to comply with Federal laws are able to obtain money from federal funds The rationale from this judge is that without these funds, the city of Chicago cannot survive. Is no one paying attention to the fact that Progressive leftist run cities like Chicago have failed because they do stupid things like protect illegal aliens from justice?

  • Mike McCloud

    So? Who cares what ‘The Judge’ says. Answer; When funding stops-period. Problem; when those who profit by, & run the sanctuary policies don’t get their dough. Sure, The people affected by it will complain, that’s what they do, instead of create, or improve employment opps. The loudest voices, & those heard first, have so far been- – -(?!)

  • dmttbt

    Isn’t Illinois where they have to send out IOUs for the lottery winners? I think that is what you get there as a refund from paying too much for taxes if that is even possible in Illinois. Is there a big mass of people going to Illinois to live and if so why?

  • GoldenGirl2u

    These Judges need to be removed, along with these Mayors who think they don’t have to follow the laws that the rest of us do. Illinois has been bankrupt on all levels because of politicians who only care about holding their jobs and enriching themselves over the welfare of the citizens. We are a nation of laws and illegal entry into the U.S. is just that, ILLEGAL, first law they broke. They do not deserve to be allowed to flourish under our tax dollars while people who are waiting, sometimes for years, to come here. Chicago is the worst city for crime and yet they say this law will do harm, give me a break. Their already a cesspool, how about doing something different. When illegals become more important than the U.S. Citizen and elected officials are promoting it, these people have to go and A.G. Sessions needs to come down like a sledge hammer. Republicans need to grow a spine also and quit sitting back and watching while the Socialist Dems. destroy the country thereby making them an accessory. MAGA, we are a nation of laws and no one is above the law, Judges and others need to lose their jobs along with a lot of others.

  • exoticdoc2

    You know how low the country is at a horrible low in its decline when the judges responsible for upholding the law actually support the criminals. Been going on a long time now.

  • cathylovesyou

    No way, this judge is favoring Communist against the rule of law of the United States. They keep trying to tear down our country instead of protecting legitimate Citizens in favor of illegal criminals who harm people harm towns villages and promote killing in our schools. Just read the newspaper liberal or Conservative which there aren’t many. We are Blind to Kruschev’s prodictions.

  • regulus30

    An employee telling the boss what to do? Do it anyway and let these liberal suck jobs come up with a suit. I agree with “truth seeker”; the laws are the laws until rewritten by legislature.

  • Stephen Serafin

    That’s pure baloney since the Federal Government has routinely used the Carrot and Stick Method for decades. Does your State want Federal Highway funds? Then enforce the 55 mph speed limits enacted during the Carter Administration; most of which has been repealed. Does your State want Federal Highway funds? Then pass a seat belt law. If your State wants Federal Education funding, then abide by Title 9 or else lose your education funding. What more do you want to know about Precedence?

  • JamesJ

    i would tell that judge to try and enforce his ruling that has no basis in law. I would like to see him explain to Chicago that they are causing harm by allowing illegals and they have an obligation to enforce the law.

  • Pete

    Slow walk is still a walk. The federal funding to a city/state come in many forms, & the judge ruled on only one of them.

  • dmttbt

    They stopped the order because it would create harm to the state. I say we take steps to stop these so called judges from overreaching and hurting the united states by using tax payer funds o abort the immigration laws. There should be massive removal of politicians who have and are wasting the money and time of the people who keep this country running.

    • ipsd48

      How would it ‘hurt the state’ by reducing the number of illegals……..and the crime they bring with them?

  • DrBillLemoine

    Looks like the phrasing in the concluding sentence is wrong. The injunction should apply to all jurisdictions not just Chicago. This is simply simpleton Sessions trying to please his puppet master Trump by stretching the law to achieve an anti-immigrant position the far right citizen prefers. But still we have a nation of laws, not men. And this judge has no Mexican heritage so the stupid spin meisters can’t say the judges heritage made him ineligible to rule on immigration law.

    • chw2000

      Hey dumb ass bill, I know this judge personally and he’s as liberal as they come. You would love him because he’s just like you. The only law he understands is the law he illegally makes. You’re still a dumb ass and an ass hole.

      • DrBillLemoine

        Do you ever think about what you write? The law is the law, modified by facts and precedence in each separate case. ‘Liberal’ is a political choice though also determined by facts and precedence, but there’s a difference in changing policy planks. Your lack of thought reflects a political, not legal argument, about a judge. Your stance can be discounted by ordinary people who believe and follow Christianity, or any religious code of substance. You are immoral but also unethical and unprincipled whether you ‘know’ the judge, or not which is my suspicion. The disrespect you show to me proves you are not Christian or legally oriented–like Trump and Sessions.

        • chw2000

          Grants have requirements by the provider of that grant. You really are a dumb ass. Whatever entity providing the “grant” can place whatever requirements they want on that grant. Go back to school dumb ass. As for my morality, you are not the one to judge. AND as for ethics, as a dumb ass liberal “educator”, I would suspect you’re the one that’;s unethical. AS for respect shown to you, that’s something that has to be earned. You haven’t done that. You’re a dumb ass.

          • DrBillLemoine

            You are correct in general, but don’t ignore that requirements must be legal and constitutional, which isn’t the case withholding funds from sanctuary cities the courts have found. Despite your atheism, I still think you can learn from my experience and thinking.
            If you want me to discern truth from what you say, you should write with some degree of ethics and morality. You are so fixated on juvenile interactions and labels, it’s hard to get through any correspondence. Also, it shows you aren’t learning anything from me. BTW it’s called ‘discernment’ for Christians, those with a Holy Spirit of the Living God in themselves, not judgment.
            My writing and concepts have stood the test of public scrutiny in writing and orally for a long time. You could take a lesson from that considering your isolation and ongoing name-calling.

          • chw2000

            I guess you where ordained when you got your dr. in mathematics? You’re an ass hole and those that administer grants certainly can require cooperation with the federal government. There is nothing unconstitutional about that. You are wrong………….and an ass hole.

  • austin farrell

    While I have not read the cases, my understanding is that once money hasbeen committed by th Federal Governmnt for a specific purpose and under specified
    and agreed terms and conditions, the Gov. cannot use the withholding of committed funds to coerce something else from the grantee government. Here the grant is annually applied for , the application is reviewed and the governmental agency making the grant ccn impose new conditions- coercive or not. Because there is apparently no requirement that a grant be made at all .It would seem to me that just because the grants have beenmade for a number ofyears( under the Obama Admin) and a mismanaged Illinois and Chicagogoverment has gotten used to having the money that is no basis for sayght e terms of the grant have to remain unaltered this year

    • ipsd48

      Yet if the money provided by the federal govt is misused or misappropriated (spent on illegals instead of its designed purpose) the federal govt can refuse to release the money or demand repayment

  • generalJed

    I’ve always wondered why “activist’ Republican judges never used their office to stop crazy liberal laws and schemes. Are they gutless, or do they just let things go after they are elected because they are lazy?

  • Walter Flatt

    WHEN DID A FEDERAL JUDGE HAVE MORE POWER THAN THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE USA? I WOULD IGNORE THIS STUPID JUDGE AND FILE CHARGES AGAINST HIM/HER.

    PRAY FOR TRUMP AND SHARE THIS WITH EVERYONE YOU CAN. I HAVE VERIFED THE CAMPS, IF YOU DONT BELIEVE, GOOGLE MUSLIM BROTHERHOOD TERROR CAMPS OF THE USA. WHAT THEY WILL NOT DO TO COVE THIS UP. PRAY FOR AMERICA.

    FROM A REGISTERED DEMOCRAT, A KOREAN WAR VET, AND A CHRISTIAN. I AM AN AMERICAN AND PROUDLY, I VOTED FOR TRUMP. I AM 86 AND HAVE NEVER SEEN A MORE QUALIFIED PERSON TO BE PRESIDENT.

    I CAN TAKE 100 WELL ARMED SOLDIERS THAT WANT TO KILL, AND TAKE ANY BASE IN 1 HOUR, OUR TROOPS NOT ARMED. BETTER ARM THEN NOW.

    TRUMP NEEDS TO FIRE EVERYONE CONNECTED TO THE DEMOCRATS AND REALLY INVESTIGATE THE REAL MUSLIM PROBLEM WE ARE FACING.

    PUBLIC LAW 414, PAGE 2, SECTION 212 WAS PASSED IN 1952 AND THIS LAW SHOULD BE ENFORCED. IT BANS ALL PEOPLE THAT ARE TRYING TO DESTROY US, THAT INCLUDE ALL MUSLIMS.

    5 CAMPS IN NORTH VA. CLOSE TO WASHINGTON, A MINIMUM OF 31 MORE CLOSE TO MILITARY BASES, AND A FEMA CAMP, (SOME STATES MORE), IN EVERY STATE. BUILT WITH TAX PAYER $. TO HOUSE MUSLIMS???

    READ THE QURAN, THEIR BIBLE. IF THE CAMPS IN N. VA. ARE TO TAKE DC. WE WILL HAVE A LOT OF HEADLESS POLITICIANS.

    COULD IT BE THAT OBAMA, AND ALL HIS APPOINTEES, SOROS, HILLIARY, KERRY, FORMER HEAD OF CIA AND FBI, SEVERAL SENATORS AND REPRESENTATIVES AND THE NEWS MEDIA, HAVE SET US UP FOR OBAMA TO LEAD A MUSLIM INVASION OF OUR COUNTRY? IF NOT,

    WHY TRY AND BUY UP ALL AMMO AND TAKE OUR GUNS. DID THEY GIVE THEM TO THE ONES BROUGHT IN?

    WHY ARE THE 5 MUSLIM CAMPS IN N. VA. JUST ACROSS THE LINE FROM DC???????

    WHY, WHILE IN OFFICE, DID HE SET HIS CABINET WITH MOSTLY MUSLIMS.

    WHY WAS HILLIARY’S TOP AIDE A RADICAL MUSLIM,

    WHY IS THE DEMOCRAT PARTY FOR A OPEN BORDER. COULD IT BE TO GET FREE DOPE, GOODGLE, THE NEW CLINTON CHRONICLES 2015 AND LISTEN TO IT ALL.

    WHY ARE ALL MUSLIM CAMPS CLOSE TO OUR MILITARY BASES? COULD IT BE FOR A TRY TO TAKE THEM?

    WHY, DID OBAMA SEND BILLIONS TO HIS MUSLIM FRIENDS. THERE ARE A LOT MOR WHY? THINK.

    THIS COUNTRY HAD BETTER WAKE UP QUICK.

    • Any federal judge that has to gain approval of the Congress is superior to the Attorney General, who is appointed.

  • TAM44

    That was no judge, that was a slap in the faces of all American taxpaying citizens.

  • Leslie Woodhull

    SORRY JUDGIE-BOY, OVERRULED!! YES HE CAN AND YES HE WILL!!! ILLINOIS, YOU’RE IN DEBT AND YOU’RE IN CONTEMPT!!

  • spaceweasel

    The Liberal judge should be held accountable for aiding and abetting a crime.

  • steve whitlow

    I pulled a Wiki on this 80 year old Senile, RINO, who needs to take some courses at The Hillsdale on the absolute powers of all judges & who is in charge of their responsibilties, which is AG JEFF SESSIONS, THE BUCK WILL STOP WITH JEFF & if hasn’t GOT GONADS then the Supreme Court Surely Has a BIG SET OF GONADS. I’ll Bet that when Trump gets enough of this BS he will order maybe Martial Law to create LAW & Order over all these ” USEFULL IDIOTS “. TAKE CHARGE SESSIONS & TRUMP BUT DO IT SOONER THAN LATER, or ” WE THE PEOPLE WILL DO THE CORRECT THING !!!!! Thanks SCW a Vietnam Era Vet. 1965-1971…..

  • CBUJAN

    He’s got to be a liberal judge.

    • metheoldsarge

      And a Reagan appointee.

      • dmttbt

        A lot of people have lost their mind since Reagan was president. These judges and politicians alike stay in office long after dementia has gotten to them. Set the old b out on the curb.

    • ABO

      Ya think???

  • mudguy1

    “The court finds that the city has established that it would suffer irreparable harm if a preliminary injunction is not entered,”
    So it is ok if these illegals cause irreparable harm to the whole country.
    Sad judges can over ride congress and the Constitution.

  • Tiger

    First off Sanctuary cities are breaking our Federal Immigration laws, Trump needs to take one of the Mayors and prosecute him under those laws to the max of that the law allows. This will send a very strong message.

    Then we know every state has the means to impeach or to take down their judges. They need to do it. Judges are not above the law and they are now the threat to our country Thomas Jefferson foresaw.

    Here is the entire list of states and how judges can be removed.
    http://www.judicialselection.us/judicial_selection/methods/removal_of_judges.cfm?state

    I call BS and something must give and I am tired of it being our laws.

    8 U.S. Code § 1324 – Bringing in and harboring certain aliens

    US Code

    Notes

    Authorities (CFR)

    prev | next

    (a) Criminal penalties

    (1)

    (A) Any person who—

    (i)

    knowing that a person is an alien, brings to or attempts to bring to the United States
    in any manner whatsoever such person at a place other than a designated
    port of entry or place other than as designated by the Commissioner,
    regardless of whether such alien has received prior official
    authorization to come to, enter, or reside in the United States and regardless of any future official action which may be taken with respect to such alien;

    (ii)

    knowing or in reckless disregard of the fact that an alien has come to, entered, or remains in the United States in violation of law, transports, or moves or attempts to transport or move such alien within the United States by means of transportation or otherwise, in furtherance of such violation of law;

    (iii)

    knowing or in reckless disregard of the fact that an alien has come to, entered, or remains in the United States
    in violation of law, conceals, harbors, or shields from detection, or
    attempts to conceal, harbor, or shield from detection, such alien in any
    place, including any building or any means of transportation;

    (iv)

    encourages or induces an alien to come to, enter, or reside in the United States, knowing or in reckless disregard of the fact that such coming to, entry, or residence is or will be in violation of law; or

    (v)

    (I)

    engages in any conspiracy to commit any of the preceding acts, or

    (II)

    aids or abets the commission of any of the preceding acts,

    shall be punished as provided in subparagraph (B).

    (B) A person who violates subparagraph (A) shall, for each alien in respect to whom such a violation occurs—

    (i)

    in the case of a
    violation of subparagraph (A)(i) or (v)(I) or in the case of a violation
    of subparagraph (A)(ii), (iii), or (iv) in which the offense was done
    for the purpose of commercial advantage or private financial gain, be
    fined under title 18, imprisoned not more than 10 years, or both;

    (ii)

    in the case of a
    violation of subparagraph (A)(ii), (iii), (iv), or (v)(II), be fined
    under title 18, imprisoned not more than 5 years, or both;

    (iii)

    in the case of a
    violation of subparagraph (A)(i), (ii), (iii), (iv), or (v) during and
    in relation to which the person causes serious bodily injury (as defined
    in section 1365 of title 18) to, or places in jeopardy the life of, any person, be fined under title 18, imprisoned not more than 20 years, or both; and

    (iv)

    in the case of a
    violation of subparagraph (A)(i), (ii), (iii), (iv), or (v) resulting in
    the death of any person, be punished by death or imprisoned for any
    term of years or for life, fined under title 18, or both.

    (C)

    It is not a violation of clauses [1] (ii) or (iii) of subparagraph (A), or of clause (iv) of subparagraph (A) except where a person encourages or induces an alien to come to or enter the United States, for a religious denomination having a bona fide nonprofit, religious organization in the United States,
    or the agents or officers of such denomination or organization, to
    encourage, invite, call, allow, or enable an alien who is present in the United States to perform the vocation of a minister or missionary for the denomination or organization in the United States as
    a volunteer who is not compensated as an employee, notwithstanding the
    provision of room, board, travel, medical assistance, and other basic
    living expenses, provided the minister or missionary has been a member
    of the denomination for at least one year.

    (2) Any person who, knowing or in reckless disregard of the fact that an alien has not received prior official authorization to come to, enter, or reside in the United States, brings to or attempts to bring to the United States
    in any manner whatsoever, such alien, regardless of any official action
    which may later be taken with respect to such alien shall, for each
    alien in respect to whom a violation of this paragraph occurs—

    (A)

    be fined in accordance with title 18 or imprisoned not more than one year, or both; or

    (B) in the case of—

    (i)

    an offense committed with the intent or with reason to believe that the alien unlawfully brought into the United States will commit an offense against the United States or any State punishable by imprisonment for more than 1 year,

    (ii)

    an offense done for the purpose of commercial advantage or private financial gain, or

    (iii)

    an offense in which the alien is not upon arrival immediately brought and presented to an appropriate immigration officer at a designated port of entry,

    be
    fined under title 18 and shall be imprisoned, in the case of a first or
    second violation of subparagraph (B)(iii), not more than 10 years, in
    the case of a first or second violation of subparagraph (B)(i) or
    (B)(ii), not less than 3 nor more than 10 years, and for any other
    violation, not less than 5 nor more than 15 years.

    (3)

    (A)

    Any person who, during
    any 12-month period, knowingly hires for employment at least 10
    individuals with actual knowledge that the individuals are aliens described in subparagraph (B) shall be fined under title 18 or imprisoned for not more than 5 years, or both.

    (B) An alien described in this subparagraph is an alien who—

    (i)

    is an unauthorized alien (as defined in section 1324a(h)(3) of this title), and

    (ii)

    has been brought into the United States in violation of this subsection.

    (4) In the case of a person who has brought aliens into the United States in violation of this subsection, the sentence otherwise provided for may be increased by up to 10 years if—

    (A)

    the offense was part of an ongoing commercial organization or enterprise;

    (B)

    aliens were transported in groups of 10 or more; and

    (C)

    (i)

    aliens were transported in a manner that endangered their lives; or

    (ii)

    the aliens presented a life-threatening health risk to people in the United States.

    (b) Seizure and forfeiture

    (1) In general

    Any conveyance, including any vessel,
    vehicle, or aircraft, that has been or is being used in the commission
    of a violation of subsection (a), the gross proceeds of such violation,
    and any property traceable to such conveyance or proceeds, shall be
    seized and subject to forfeiture.

    (2) Applicable procedures

    Seizures and forfeitures under this subsection shall be governed by the provisions of chapter 46 of title 18 relating
    to civil forfeitures, including section 981(d) of such title, except
    that such duties as are imposed upon the Secretary of the Treasury under
    the customs laws described in that section shall be performed by such
    officers, agents, and other persons as may be designated for that
    purpose by the Attorney General.

    (3) Prima facie evidence in determinations of violationsIn determining whether a violation of subsection (a) has occurred, any of the following shall be prima facie evidence that an alien involved in the alleged violation had not received prior official authorization to come to, enter, or reside in the United States or that such alien had come to, entered, or remained in the United States in violation of law:

    (A)

    Records of any judicial or administrative proceeding in which that alien’s status was an issue and in which it was determined that the alien had not received prior official authorization to come to, enter, or reside in the United States or that such alien had come to, entered, or remained in the United States in violation of law.

    (B)

    Official records of the Service
    or of the Department of State showing that the alien had not received
    prior official authorization to come to, enter, or reside in the United States or that such alien had come to, entered, or remained in the United States in violation of law.

    (C)

    Testimony, by an immigration officer
    having personal knowledge of the facts concerning that alien’s status,
    that the alien had not received prior official authorization to come to,
    enter, or reside in the United States or that such alien had come to,
    entered, or remained in the United States in violation of law.

    (c) Authority to arrest

    No officer or person shall have authority to
    make any arrests for a violation of any provision of this section except
    officers and employees of the Service designated by the Attorney General, either individually or as a member of a class, and all other officers whose duty it is to enforce criminal laws.

    (d) Admissibility of videotaped witness testimony

    Notwithstanding any provision of the Federal
    Rules of Evidence, the videotaped (or otherwise audiovisually preserved)
    deposition of a witness to a violation of subsection (a) who has been
    deported or otherwise expelled from the United States,
    or is otherwise unable to testify, may be admitted into evidence in an
    action brought for that violation if the witness was available for cross
    examination and the deposition otherwise complies with the Federal
    Rules of Evidence.

    (e) Outreach program

    The Secretary of Homeland Security, in consultation with the Attorney General
    and the Secretary of State, as appropriate, shall develop and implement
    an outreach program to educate the public in the United States and
    abroad about the penalties for bringing in and harboring aliens in
    violation of this section.

    • Go back and read and understand the Tenth Amendment and you will know who the real criminals are.

  • Rich

    Do you wonder why 75% of the taxpayers in Illinois want to leave. This used to be such a great state to grow up in. Arrest some of these santuary state jerks for aiding.

  • joeupyours

    do like o dumb @$$ an just “ignore” the MF’ER!

  • Cuebid6

    If they’d just impeach some of the judicial activists there would be fewer of these traitors spouting off.

    • ipsd48

      …..or some of those sanctuary city politicians who are breaking the law

    • GoldenGirl2u

      Wouldn’t it be wonderful if anyone in government was actually held accountable and not by saying “I take full responsibility”, how about some actual consequences for a change.

  • teaman

    Another lying despicable liberal judge is creating law. It’s not just the swamp that needs cleaning.

    • Watch out for the alligators, they are more dangerous than stingrays.

  • kbfallon

    I say…..that Attorney General of the United States should just lift his leg and fart in the general direction of the so-called judge who decided that he can over rule the US Attorney General.

    • They are called justices of the Supreme Court because they are superior to any appointee.

  • Mike N

    Is that not the reason for withholding grants is to cause harm. If you don’t want irreparable harm obey the law. It is that simple.

  • Jmanjo

    I think SCOTUS needs to issue a memo on how federal judge should carry out their responsibilities instead of sucking up to all the Democrats! It is time for Congress to get off its butt and approve Trump’s appointments pronto! McCain can go jump off the grand Canyon!

  • Bruce Kellar

    Golly, sure does look like this decision was impartial and had nothing to do with politics or reality. These liberal mental midgets should be living in hobo jungles instead of on the backs of hard working Americans. Bum’s is what they are leeching from the public all they can squeeze. Mental illness has overtaken the nation. The insane really are running the asylum.

  • Jose

    President Trump: Tell sessions to grow some cajones or have him replaced with someone who does. Take it to SCOTUS NOW!!!!!!!!!

  • Norman Fox

    Since when in the chain of command of the United States Govt is a lowly liberal or any judge over the Attorney General. Am I missing something here. Sessions is a Judge and he is OVER all these sissies that call themselves judges. WHERE IS THE RULE OF LAW. OR IS ANARCHY ON THE HORIZON?

    • GoldenGirl2u

      Anarchy and lawlessness has been here for a long time but Obama blew it up with all his garbage, he should have been impeached for all his lawless acts. The Dems are nothing but obstructionists and Republicans are wimps. Disgraceful

      • Norman Fox

        You have that right. Unfortunately the greatest generation WW11 have mostly died off. All we have now is wannabee and has been sucking of true patriots. As old as I am I am there

        • WW11? What happened to WW3 through WW10?

          • Norman Fox

            UH DUH little person that is how most intelligent knowledgeable people write WORLD WAR TWO (2) is that simple enough for you?

          • You are the one lacking understanding, not I.
            If you didn’t want to use a “2”, you should have used two “I”s, as in WWII. Your error was in using two “1”s instead. You aren’t part of the “most intelligent knowledgeable people” that you cite.

  • KKmoderate

    We’ll see

  • The_Frog_Prince

    The word “Chicago” and “Illinois” is a tip off about an activist judge again.

    • Norman Fox

      The land of corruption, lies, murder capital, crooked government.

      • ABO

        A fine example of the entire liberal/progressive movement.

  • Patriot47

    Activist liberal Illinois judge finds against Trump.

    Whatta shock!

    SCOTUS needs to review.

    • truthseeker

      This is when the AG Sessions needs to make it clear that our Laws that are in place to support the right for Legal Citizens and taxpayers are being infringed upon. The Judge is in contempt for our Justice to have the Priority to those who are Citizens and pay their taxes have the voice in how our money is suppose to be spent, and it is not to support the Gangs that are wanted for crimes . Those crimes start when the invaders ( Illegals) cross our border into our Country without permission. I do hope that Jeff Sessions will show some backbone, but I seriously doubt that that will happen.

      • Norman Fox

        As I said before in the chain of command and Rule of Law, Sessions is a Judge and he holds the office of ATTORNEY GENERAL in this Republic For those of you who do not understand, he is over the rest of these lame so called judges.If this is not true welcome to communism,socialism, and anarchy, you wanted it you got it. When was this thrown out of the United States Of America? The term is that he is the head of such things, not these snot nose liberal leftist judges giving my tax money away to illegals.I GUESS SINCE THE 1/2 BREED NIGGER WHO IS QUEER STARTED BREAKING DOWN OUR GOVERNMENT TO BECOME A THIRD WORLD COUNTRY IT BECAME LEGAL.
        SO the answer is quite simple, all of US TRUE PATRIOTS, OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA A REPUBLIC STOP FUNDING THIS GIVE AWAY GOVERNMENT . Then they will not have money to throw away on a bunch of illegals who come here for the freebees. After all this is what the leftist liberal,snowflakes socialist and communist wants is it NOT? Another third world country. Then we are as broke as the rest of the world and you got communism, socialism, fascist govt. SEE WE WHO PAY THE BILLS WANT OUR FREEBEES ALSO, THAT IS HOW SOCIALISM WORKS EVERYONE IS THE SAME. IN THIS CASE “BROKE”

        • StephanieWSnow


          (Make $99/hr with Google)(Get-paid-weekly by Google)(what’s more, carry on with a financially solid life…)
          last monday I got a new range Land Rover Range Rover since getting a cheque for $12899 this last 4 weeks . this is definitely the most comfortable work I have ever had . I started this seven months/ago and straight away was bringin in over $85, per-hour . look at this web-site
          !si295d:
          ➽➽
          ➽➽;➽➽ http://GoogleInternetNationWorkFromHome/simple/work ★✫★★✫★✫★★✫★✫★★✫★✫★★✫★✫★★✫★✫★★✫★✫★★✫★✫★★✫★✫★★✫★✫★★✫★✫:::::!sa245l..,….

          • podunk1

            Judge Harry Leinenweber’s Northern District of Illinois finding that the most corrupted lawless and treasonous city in the USA (CHICAGO) trumps the Constitution with HIS OPINION “The court finds that the city has established that it would suffer irreparable harm if a preliminary injunction is not entered” and “nationwide in scope”! It’s TREASON! Progressive communist Judge Leinenweber and Chicago Mayor Emanuel are lighting the fires of rebellion by OFFICIALLY acting to defy Constitutional law enforcement and overthrow the Constitution in Chicago and the USA!

            Sessions and Trump must act immediately! This isn’t a disorderly conduct or a public intoxication jailing! It’s HIGH TREASON! Instead of an armed civil war conflict, send in a Seal Teams at night to arrest and jail both incommunicado… out of sight and influence, with immediate morning after securing the the crime scene offices!

            Ref… Applicable Supreme Law text… “as quoted”… check it out
            Supreme Law Text BEGINS with the preamble, “We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defence, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America.”! EXCLUSIVE CLAUSES “TO OURSELVES” and “TO THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA’, clearly gives zero rights to any alien, other than by official permission to visit. The very first clause within the Constitution Article I Section 1 “All legislative Powers… shall be vested in a Congress…”, wherein the very first word “ALL” leaves zero legislative powers to ANY JUDGE!!
            Article III Section 1 “The Judges, both of the supreme and inferior Courts, shall hold their Offices during good Behavior…”; wherein “Anything to the contrary” (allegiance betrayal) goes beyond bad behavior into treason! Rebellion is acts against Constitution authority! Article 3 Section 3 text states Aiding or comforting enemies (of the Constitution)” is “TREASON” , which clearly includes criminal alien invaders who violate sovereignty, law, and pillage citizen the treasury plus rights to Constitutional privileges, benefits, jobs, and taxpayer funded infrastructures!!

            Article 2 Section 3 (PRESIDENT) “…he shall take Care that the Laws be faithfully executed…”, places powers of law enforcement with the executivre branch (TRUMP & SESSIONS), NOT JUDGES!

            Citizens have powers to defend THEIR Constitution in ANY COURT… it’s called a civil rights offense in civil and criminal courts! The president (Article 2-1&3) and any Sheriff (by DUTY & ALLEGIANCE) are 2nd oath empowered and authorized to arrest and HOLD anyone who is acting against Supreme Law… which includes progressive judges who are violating it! ARREST & LOCK TRAITORS UP NOW!

        • It is unconstitutional to hold an office in two branches of the federal government simultaneously.

      • Reasoned thinker

        truthseeker — Absolutely correct!

      • dmttbt

        Our government (the mafia) has already stolen more money than we can pay but that isn’t enough for them. They do not want us to have small arms or anything else the at we can use to protect our rights.

        • truthseeker

          Speaking about our Government. It seems a lot of the Mayor’s are ordering our Police to ” Stand down”. I guess they want the so called: ” Protestors” to have room to destroy. Funny how one Mayor has had their Property splattered with Red Paint. Mayor Bill De Blassio of New York appears to really hate the NYPD and I wonder why he feels he can get protection, but the rest of us can’t.

          • DeBassio can afford to pay for his own protection by real professionals, much as Trump does. Assurance of instant death is the only thing that will stand down a well-vested federal agent.

          • truthseeker

            Mayor Bill De Bliazo of New York city and he gets his money granted to him through the people , and if he refuses to protect the People/Taxpayers . That ill-gotten allegations of funds for his protection can be defunded by the people . He is not a Millionaire, just a leach off of our Society and when you bite the hand that feeds you, you will find just which side your-( Bread is buttered on ).

          • Are you his accountant and/or attorney?

    • carpkiller

      Yes and now.

  • JoanWMorgan


    Get paid weekly by Google (Make $99/hr with Google) and live a financially strong life…
    last tuesday I got a great new range Land Rover Range Rover from bringing in $12073 this last five weeks . it’s certainly my favourite work I have ever done . I started this 7-months ago and straight away startad bringin in more than $75… per-hr . try this web-site
    !si293d:
    ➽➽
    ➽➽;➽➽ http://GoogleGetJobsTipsFinanceJobs/easy/jobs ★✫★★✫★✫★★✫★✫★★✫★✫★★✫★✫★★✫★✫★★✫★✫★★✫★✫★★✫★✫★★✫★✫★★✫★✫:::::!sp203l..,….

?>

Keep the Fake News Media in check.

Don’t let the MSM censor your news as America becomes Great Again. Over 500,000 Americans receive our daily dose of life, liberty and pursuit of happiness along with Breaking News direct to their inbox—and you can too. Sign up to receive news and views from The 1776Coalition!

We know how important your privacy is and your information is SAFE with us. We’ll never sell
your email address and you can unsubscribe at any time directly from your inbox.
View our full privacy policy.

Facebook Auto Publish Powered By : XYZScripts.com
Google Analytics Alternative