Glenn Beck Makes Unprecedented Endorsement…

by Bradford Richardson | The Hill  |  published on January 24, 2016

Conservative commentator Glenn Beck on Saturday endorsed Republican presidential candidate Ted Cruz for the White House.

Beck compared Cruz to the 16th president, Abraham Lincoln, and gave him a compass that belonged to the first one, George Washington.

“I’m taking a very big risk here and gambling on it, but this is how much I believe in Ted Cruz,” Beck said at a Cruz rally in Ankeny, Iowa.

  • Kenneth Bednar

    On the other side of the fence. Wait until Trump has to answer for his relationship with George Sorors. I refer to your article by by Wilson Monday, Apr 25, 2011 at 1:14 PM EST

    Source: http://www.glennbeck.com/2011/04/25/trump-tied-to-soros/?utm_source=glennbeck&utm_medium=contentcopy_link

    I found this: Should you want to review this and maybe make a comment on it on your show before the IOWA caucuses?

    RICO Lawsuit Filed Against George Soros and Donald Trump

    http://www.thehealersjournal.com/2012/07/04/rico-lawsuit-filed-against-george-soros-and-donald-trump/

    Respectfully yours

    Kenneth W Bednar

    I have watched and agree with you since before Obama got put in the office the first time by the Soros plan.

  • Amwakeup

    Glen Beck.I used to follow you and listen to your every word. Now the past couple of years…you are off my list of smart men. The country needs a complete Change of leadership .and the only one who can give us that, is
    Donald Trump. His finger is on all the things wrong in this country, And he speaks up unafraid about all of the stupied deals that have been made by POTUS and Congress sits around just waiting for their new terms.(what a waste) with the ideas that have not worked ones implemented by Obama,he has proved to be the most uninformed ,slow, devious president in all history of America, We want to be smart and great and have a great leader, The Americans need TRUMP to build us up back to greatness(as he does with all his projects) Trump for President ,and we have a chance for a new and better living and working experience .Plus safety He is very smart ,not afraid ,and will lead with confidence .P .S . Trump should bring JOE THE PLUMMER on stage,Joe
    sized up Obama from the GETGO. And down with p.c. that’s only for people who lead from behind like Obama does. We will be able to get up front and once more lead up front the American way.

  • GQ4U

    I am surprised that Beck would support a candidate like Cruz who is constitutionally ineligible to be president.

    • YoOleMe

      … that’s exactly the point!!! Beck’s carrying his elitist master’s water, for whatever value his support may bring, to cause the Republican version of Barry S. to be instituted, thus creating at least a color of law, presidential repudiation of the Art. II, Sect. 1, Cls.[5] mandate — notwithstanding the fact, in REAL Law:

      Things repugnant to a Constitution are null & void on their face. But then:

      Since here, in what’s left of any FUNCTIONAL FORM of these united States of America, We the People are the Political Powers Sovereign[s], albeit reduced to the mental state of a child in that capacity; then who is there to provide substantive enforcement of that Document’s unmitigated LAWFUL COMMAND[S]!?!?

      • GQ4U

        Hopefully the enlightenment of enough sovereigns will bring about compliance.

  • runnindeer

    Ted Cruz can’t convince me that he is a true conservative Evangelical Christian when he has not given more than 40$, 000.00 to charity when making more than 1 Million 8 Hundred thousand – rounded out – during the years of 2006 to 2010. That is less than 1%. Evangelicals give. that is an absolute fact.
    Ted Cruz claims that he can’t remember loans for thousands of dollars. He failed to report large sums on his tax reports and says “he forgot”. Yet wants to be a steward of Americas money . I also call BS on his claim that he didn’t know about his Canadian citizenship status until 15 months ago. Right as he began his presidential run.
    Ted Cruz claims a lot of things…. including the fact that he” is for amnesty for illegals.” I have heard him say it more than once.
    Personally, Glen Beck or the Pope can endorse Ted Cruz but I don’t want to put this nation on Cruz control.
    My family , friends , associates , and I will continue to support Donald J. Trump for President of the United States of America in 2016.

  • eassa

    I watched Glenn’s speech on the Blaze and it was excellent, followed by another very wonderful speech by Cruz.
    When listening to Cruz, he is able to communicate details about the issues and his plans and solutions.
    I cannot help but remember the passage in the Bible telling believers to mature so that you can eat the meat of the Word, that we should not stay as babies that can only handle the milk of the Word.
    Cruz is the meat candidate. Sadly,Trump is for those who can only handle milk.

    • GQ4U

      Trump is a narcissistic megalomaniac.

      Cruz is ineligible to be POTUS under Article-2, Section-1, Clause-5. If you can eat the sincere meat of the Word then you should also be able to learn & understand the US Constitution to know through historical documentation what a Natural Born Citizen is. A president Cruz would be violating the law and living a lie — something the scriptures warn against.

  • Ray Eldridge

    Beck is another wolf in sheep’s clothing. He is out for the buck and himself and that is it! If he and his company can make a dollar off it that is all he is out for. He ripped me off when they went to Israel and shut my service down and wouldn’t answer my calls so I washed my hands with them all!!! It is all on the wheel and what goes around comes around…As Paul wrote in Rom 12:19; “…avenge not yourselves, but rather give place unto wrath: for it is written, Vengeance is mine; I will repay, saith the Lord.” KJV

  • YoOleMe

    Glenn Apparatchik Beck is MORMON (IMHO a ‘F***ING’ LUCIFERIAN) and (paying the Devil ITS dues!!!): He is a MASTER AT HIS CRAFT!!!!

    He not only perpetuates the “Two-Party” MYTH; he nefariously manages to do so within the tone of the system’s agenda, while maintaining the appearance he’s “outside-looking-in with great sagacious introspection,” always with aid of being AFTER THE GREAT 72-hour American Attention-Span FADE interval, sufficient to convert his allusions, into subconscious pseudo-fact in the public VICTIM’S MIND. … Within all of this I find:

    Beck’s endorsement of the CRUZ, NWO WIND-UP TOY, FITS!!!!

  • unique201

    Cruz is an Establishment candidate. He has taken Money from Goldman Sachs and other Wall Street firms.
    I am still going with “The Donald,” because the Establishment doesn’t want him and he is not beholden to anyone. I will never vote for Bloomberg because he is another Gun Grabber.

    • frank_o_anerican

      The Establishment wins by any one we vote for except Trump, That’s why they still have Cruz, Rubio, Jeb and Christie. Any one of these we pick will be just fine with both parties, That’s why Trump is the only one they want out. They have no control over him. They pretend to not like Cruz just to make us want to vote for him if they can’t sell us on Jeb.

    • frank_o_anerican

      Bloomberg is a back up in case they throw Hillary in the clink.

      • bobnstuff

        If you want a business man as President he is far better then Trump. He is five times richer and has never had to declare bankruptcy and hasn’t been sued by the people he does business with. He is self made, unlike Trump he didn’t start when millions of Daddy”s money. Also unlike Trump he can self finance his campaign.

        • Roger Martin

          This is for all those Obama-bots and Bernie-bots and Clinton-bots, that are trying to destroy this country.

      • Roger Martin

        One thing for sure, we don’t need another Socialist-communist in office. That’s what we’ve had for the past two terms, and he has been working hard to destroy this country.

  • KDC

    From another patriot…When the Federal Reserve was being created the very people who wanted it were out saying they didn’t. Cruz is the insider. He has the most money from the establishment.
    People have a very short memory. He put up his own bills to double immigration (not including refuges or asylum seekers), and to increase HB-1 visa’s by 500%. He co-wrote article with Paul Ryan pushing TPP. He did a lot to promote TPP. He’s on record saying Sessions is wrong about TPP being bad for America. He and his Goldman Sach/CFR wife are globalist insiders with deep ties to the Bushes.
    Cruz is a globalist insider. He’s their man. Ted wants to be the first prez of the NAU.
    I’m voting for national sovereignty. The hysterics at CFR interlocked NR tells me who the oligarchs don’t own. It wasn’t Cruz on the cover. That cover was the culmination of months of article denouncing Trump.

    • bobnstuff

      From what I’ve read you are pretty much on the mark with Cruz. The problem is non of the others are much better. Trump is mister lets make a deal. A man who cheats on one wife is bad enough but when he cheats on three it makes him totally untrustworthy. Add in the fact that he doesn’t believe he has done anything he needs to ask God to forgive and this makes him not the person you want as president.

      • KDC

        The criticisms of Trump are amazingly missing something. They are​ lacking in ​negative stories from those who work for him or have had business dealings with him. After all the employees he’s had and all the business deals he’s made there is a void of criticism. In fact, long term employees call him a strong and merciful leader and say he is far more righteous and of high integrity than people may think​.

        And while it may surprise many, he’s actually humble when it comes to his generosity and kindness. A good example is a story that tells of his limo breaking down on a deserted highway outside of New York City. A middle-aged couple stopped to help him and as a thank you he paid off their mortgage, but he didn’t brag about that. Generous and good people rarely talk of charity they bestow on others.

        ​But as much​ as all this is interesting, the real thing that people want to know is what Donald Trump’s plan is for America. It’s funny how so many people say they don’t know what it is, or they act like Trump is hiding it. The information is readily available if people would just do a little homework. Most Americans won’t do their own research.

        • bobnstuff

          I have read a lot about Mr. Trump and don’t trust any thing he says. He tells you how great he is, what a wonderful businessman he is, how much money he has made. In the same time frame Bloomberg made ten times the money and didn’t declare bankruptcy one and wasn’t sued by investors once. I will bet that Mr. Bloomberg can even go to any country in the world meet with any world leader he wants. Trump started a foundation back a few years ago. He hasn’t given it any money since 2005. Trump believes in living big, he likes spending money on the nice things in life, even when it’s not his money. He has had his toys taken from him at times when the banks came in and bailed him out. This is the man you want to be president. I want someone who understands what real people are going through, someone who has paid bills and balanced a budget. Trump has never had to live in the real world. It would also be nice to have someone who when they take a vow will stand by it even when thing get ruff.

          • KDC

            But as much​ as all this is interesting, the real thing that people want to know is what Donald Trump’s plan is for America. It’s funny how so many people say they don’t know what it is, or they act like Trump is hiding it. The information is readily available if people would just do a little homework. But, since most Americans won’t do their own research, here, in no particular order, is an overview of many of Trumps positions and plans:
            1.) Trump believes that America should not intervene militarily in other country’s problems without being compensated for doing so. If America is going to risk the lives of our soldiers and incur the expense of going to war, then the nations we help must be willing to pay for our help. Using the Iraq War as an example, he cites the huge monetary expense to American taxpayers (over $1.5 trillion, and possibly much more depending on what sources are used to determine the cost) in addition to the cost in human life. He suggests that Iraq should have been required to give us enough of their oil to pay for the expenses we incurred. He includes in those expenses the medical costs for our military and $5 million for each family that lost a loved one in the war and $2 million for each family of soldiers who received severe injuries.
            2.) Speaking of the military, Trump wants America to have a strong military again. He believes the single most important function of the federal government is national defense. He has said he wants to find the General Patton or General MacArthur that could lead our military buildup back to the strength it needs to be. While he hasn’t said it directly that I know of, Trump’s attitude about America and about winning tells me he’d most likely be quick to eliminate rules of engagement that handicap our military in battle. Clearly Trump is a “win at all costs” kind of guy, and I’m sure that would apply to our national defense and security, too.
            3.) Trump wants a strong foreign policy and believes that it must include 7 core principles (which seem to support my comment in the last point):

            American interests come first. Always. No apologies.
            Maximum firepower and military preparedness.
            Only go to war to win.
            Stay loyal to your friends and suspicious of your enemies.
            Keep the technological sword razor sharp.
            See the unseen. Prepare for threats before they materialize.
            Respect and support our present and past warriors.
            4.) Trump believes that terrorists who are captured should be treated as military combatants, not as criminals like the Obama administration treats them.
            5.) Trump makes the point that China’s manipulation of their currency has given them unfair advantage in our trade dealings with them. He says we must tax their imports to offset their currency manipulation, which will cause American companies to be competitive again and drive manufacturing back to America and create jobs here. Although he sees China as the biggest offender, he believes that America should protect itself from all foreign efforts to take our jobs and manufacturing. For example, Ford is building a plant in Mexico and Trump suggests that every part or vehicle Ford makes in Mexico be taxed 35% if they want to bring it into the U. S., which would cause companies like Ford to no longer be competitive using their Mexican operations and move manufacturing back to the U. S., once again creating jobs here.
            6.) Trump wants passage of NOPEC legislation (No Oil Producing and Exporting Cartels Act – NOPEC – S.394), which would allow the government to sue OPEC for violating antitrust laws. According to Trump, that would break up the cartel. He also wants to unleash our energy companies to drill domestically (sound like Sarah Palin’s drill baby, drill?) thereby increasing domestic production creating jobs and driving domestic costs of oil and gas down while reducing dependence on foreign oil.
            7.) Trump believes a secure border is critical for both security and prosperity in America. He wants to build a wall to stop illegals from entering put controls on immigration. (And he says he’ll get Mexico to pay for the wall, which many have scoffed at, but given his business successes I wouldn’t put it past him.) He also wants to enforce our immigration laws and provide no path to citizenship for illegals.
            8.) Trump wants a radical change to the tax system to not only make it better for average Americans, but also to encourage businesses to stay here and foreign businesses to move here. The resulting influx of money to our nation would do wonders for our economy. He wants to make America the place to do business. He also wants to lower the death tax and the taxes on capital gains and dividends. This would put more than $1.6 trillion back into the economy and help rebuild the 1.5 million jobs we’ve lost to the current tax system. He also wants to charge companies who outsource jobs overseas a 20% tax, but for those willing to move jobs back to America they would not be taxed. And for citizens he has a tax plan that would allow Americans to keep more of what they earn and spark economic growth. He wants to change the personal income tax to:
            Up to $30,000 taxed at 1%
            From $30,000 to $100,000 taxed at 5%
            From $100,000 to $1,000,000 taxed at 10%
            $1,000,000 and above taxed at 15%
            9.) Trump wants Obamacare repealed. He says it’s a “job-killing, health care-destroying monstrosity” that “can’t be reformed, salvaged, or fixed.” He believes in allowing real competition in the health insurance marketplace to allow competition to drive prices down. He also believes in tort reform to get rid of defensive medicine and lower costs.
            10.) Trump wants spending reforms in Washington, acknowledging that America spends far more than it receives in revenue. He has said he believes that if we don’t stop increasing the national debt once it hits $24 trillion it will be impossible to save this country.

            11.) Even though he says we need to cut spending, he does not want to harm those on Medicare, Medicaid, or Social Security. He believes that the citizens have faithfully paid in to the system to have these services available and that the American government has an obligation to fulfill its end of the bargain and provide those benefits. Therefore, he wants to build the economy up so that we have the revenue to pay those costs without cutting the benefits to the recipients. He disagrees with Democrats who think raising taxes is the answer and says that when you do that you stifle the economy. On the other hand, when you lower taxes and create an environment to help businesses they will grow, hire more workers, and those new workers will be paying taxes that become more tax revenue for the government.

            12.) Trump also wants reform of the welfare state saying that America needs “a safety net, not a hammock.” He believes in a welfare to work program that would help reduce the welfare roles and encourage people to get back to work. And he wants a crackdown on entitlement fraud.
            13.) Trump believes climate change is a hoax.

            14.) Trump opposes Common Core.

            15.) Trump is pro-life, although he allows for an exception due to rape, incest, or the life of the mother.
            16.) Trump is pro 2nd Amendment rights.
            17.) Trump’s view on same-sex marriage is that marriage is between a man and a woman, but he also believes that this is a states rights issue, not a federal issue.
            18.) Trump supports the death penalty.

            Trump believes that there is a lack of common sense, innovative thinking in Washington (Hmmm… looks like he believes in horse sense!). He says it’s about seeing the unseen and that’s the kind of thinking we need to turn this country around. He tells a personal story to illustrate the point:
            “When I opened Trump National Golf Club at Rancho Palos Verdes in Los Angeles, I was immediately told that I would need to build a new and costly ballroom. The current ballroom was gorgeous, but it only sat 200 people and we were losing business because people needed a larger space for their events. Building a new ballroom would take years to get approval and permits (since it’s on the Pacific Ocean), and cost about $5 million. I took one look at the ballroom and saw immediately what needed to be done. The problem wasn’t the size of the room, it was the size of the chairs. They were huge, heavy, and unwieldy. We didn’t need a bigger ballroom, we needed smaller chairs! So I had them replaced with high-end, smaller chairs. I then had our people sell the old chairs and got more money for them than the cost of the new chairs. In the end,the ballroom went from seating 200 people to seating 320 people. Our visitors got the space they desired, and I spared everyone the hassle of years of construction and $5 million of expense. It’s amazing what you can accomplish with a little .lcommon sense.”

            On top of his saving years of construction and $5 million in expenses, he also was able to keep the ballroom open for business during the time it would have been under remodeling, which allowed him to continue to make money on the space instead of losing that revenue during construction time.

            Donald Trump’s entire life has been made up of success and winning. He’s been accused of bankruptcies, but that’s not true. He’s never filed personal bankruptcy. He’s bought companies and legally used bankruptcy laws to restructure their debt, just as businesses do all the time. But he’s never been bankrupt personally.

            He’s a fighter that clearly loves America and would fight for our nation. Earlier I quoted Trump saying, “I love America. And when you love something, you protect it passionately – fiercely, even.” We never hear that from Democrats or even from most Republicans. Donald Trump is saying things that desperately need to be said but no other candidate has shown the fortitude to stand up and say them.

            Looking over this list of what he wants for America I see a very necessary set of goals that are long past due. Before we criticize someone because the media does, maybe we should seriously consider what he has to offer.

          • bobnstuff

            The list is to long to do a point to point reply but there are a few thing, His math doesn’t work. There is a big hole in his financing his plan. His welfare reform was done in the 1990’s. There are some treaties that would create problems on his international plans. He is really good at making problems some simple but either he doesn’t understand or he is trying to make people believe they are simple when they really aren’t. His life has been ups and downs. He looses almost as much as he wins. He has had to be bailed out a number of times and he is lucky that he had a rich Daddy and that he’s a fast talker. Companies he owned and in some cases created filled bankruptcy. He has been sued by investors and his company has been fined for money laundering. The list of his failures is as long as you list of his plans for America.

          • KDC

            Donald Trump’s entire life has been made up of success and winning. He’s been accused of bankruptcies, but that’s not true. He’s never filed personal bankruptcy. He’s bought companies and legally used bankruptcy laws to restructure their debt, just as businesses do all the time. But, he’s never been bankrupt personally. In spite of what you say, I’ve pretty much made up my mind, unless there is some scandal. And the information will have to be from a reliable source in my eyes. And it truly won’t be from a socialist/liberal source.

          • bobnstuff

            I guess you don’t know about the yacht he once owned or his Air Line. Atlantic City was his deal and it is a failure, big time. On a more personal note, how many times has he been married?

          • KDC

            I think a business man who claims bankruptcy is doing a wise thing, as he did in Atlantic City. The tool of bankruptcy is legal and there are many businessmen and individuals that use it. As for his many marriages, well, I guess I don’t condone that, but then that’s between he and God. Just like BO being homosexual and having an arraigned marriage, its all between he and God. I dont condone that either. Then you can get to the Clintons….well we don’t even need to go there do we!

          • bobnstuff

            If he was a success why did Atlantic city not work, it was his plan. When a Businessman runs a business into the ground he goes to court and pays people less then he owes them. In other words he rips off the people who trusted him. It may be the wise thing for him but he hurts other people when he does it. Also what about the Airline? You do know you are the type of person he was talking about when he said he could shoot someone and you would still follow him.

          • KDC

            Frustrating, isn’t it! Kind of like you refusing to believe all the murders the Clintons have done. Or the scandals that follow them and the BO administration. Bang….oh, you’re still following and defending.

          • bobnstuff

            I don’t believe them because there is not facts backing it up. When people create scandals I don’t worry about them, You on the other hand will buy into almost anything that you are told as long as it supports you twisted world view. Just like you believe Trump only wins and never loses. It make no read difference to me. I have spent my life in business and have dealt with people like Trump. I didn’t enjoy it. I’m sure the people that had to sue to get their money back from Trump for the condo’s he didn’t build wish they hadn’t trusted him. I know the people who went to Trump University didn’t like being ripped off. The contractors in Atlantic City that he paid 30 cents on a dollar have no love for him. I’m glad Trump makes you happy but like most drugs the after effects won’t make you happy.

  • KDC

    I have also come across posts where Ted Cruz’s wife Heidi Cruz is a member of the Council on Foreign Relations and helped write the Manual on how to merge America into a North American Union. One of the things they planned to do was mass immigration that created illegal immigration problems and would lead to a borderless America. That is in their manual. Again, Ted’s wife Heidi helped write this manual. Heidi is also on leave from Goldman Sachs in order to help her husband Ted in his campaign.

    I also learned that Carly Fiorina Foundation was heavily donating to planned parenthood to the Ayco Foundation which is a subsidiary of GOLDMAN SACHS, which controls the Fiorina

    Foundation. Heidi Cruz is currently the head of the SW region in the Investment Management Div. of Goldman Sachs and company and I wouldn’t be surprised if there were many others – as rumor has it so. Coupled with the issue a few weeks back with Ted ‘s plea to people for funds that could of been given to Carly in the order of campaign funding help, it is just odd to me that he would do that? After all he is a GOP candidate running against Carly. More or less my gut feeling tells me there may be a hidden agenda here.

    This is a huge red flag and my gut tells me that both candidates need to vacate. It smells like the GOP establishment at work.

  • Randy Tucker

    To be wise — to be safe — Ted, make sure you’re a true “natural-born citizen” (not just a “regular” citizen). Then — and only then — will more of us feel safe in voting for you. Remember, the Dems WILL take you to court if you don’t beat them to it.

    • Roger Martin

      The Dems would have no ground to stand on. They have had someone in office illegally for two terms who is not a natural born citizen. He hasn’t even produced legitimate proof of citizenship. That phony birth certificate he produced had so many flaws in it that it was ridicules. The hospital that he was supposed to be born in in the 60’s didn’t exist until the 70’s. His fathers race was stated as African. That’s a continent, not a race. It would have been black or negro if it were legitimate.

      • Randy Tucker

        Democrats don’t need any ground on which to stand. they’ve got control of the judiciary! They don’t care about consistency. The RINOs gave B.O. a pass; the Dems won’t be so kind to Ted Cruz. We need someone whose constitutional qualifications for the Presidency are clear — and in agreement with the view of “natural born citizen” that prevailed in the 1700’s.

  • Kenneth Bednar

    Cruz is not followed by his party because he challenges their status quote. He repeatedly pointed out on the senate floor the way some of them were self serving and not living up to their oaths of office to protect and defend the constitution, how they were trampling on the people they represent to cow cowing to Obama. Trump may make many deals, but how many of them will live up to the true meanings of the Constitution. Trump has little or no knowledge of what is written in the Constitution. Do you? Do You? Read it for yourself. Do not just listed to the interpretations of those who have not studied it as Cruz has. On Beck – How many of you viewed what beck has shown on video since before Obama was elected the first time? Time and again what Beck says each year is proved correct in the forthcoming years. So many times he wanted to be proved wrong. Was he? Was He? As Beck would say: Do not take what I say as an outright fact. Seek out the truth in what I say for yourself. Trust yourself, not those who only pass along spin. And when you do and discover the truth, Be Afraid, Be really Afraid. The future of America depends on you. Are you up for the task. No? — as it has been said by many our military. “Either fight with the best or die with the rest” Radical Islam wants us all dead. Why esthete so hard for many of you to understand?

    • I Seigel

      It seems you put great importance in knowing what is written in the Constitution. You do realize that Obama studied Constitutional Law at Harvard?. The same Harvard, by the way, that Cruz studied at. And he was a “Senior Lecturer” and was regarded as a Professor at the Univ of Chicago School of Law. I’ll bet he knows just as much about the US Constitution as Cruz, certainly more than Trump or Beck.

      • Kenneth Bednar

        Does not know how to follow it. CORRECTION – He knows how but does not do so.He is like a lot of lawyers. Knows enough to be able to dance around laws knowing full well that it takes time to fight against what they are doing. Relying on the courts to eventually reverse what he does now takes time and money. In the mean time whatever damage his actions do continue on un hampered. Obama has never stood in the senate attempting to defend the Constitution.

        • pete G

          I would rather see my tax money go to fighting this Muslim, communist, racist Bassterd than give it to Iran.

          • I Seigel

            What tax money of yours is going to Iran? Your comment doesn’t make a whole lot of sense.

            Your tax money is going to the oil companies, to big agriculture, and to the military-industrial complex. Not Iran.

            Ten years ago, your tax money was going to warlords in Afghanistan and disappearing into a black hole in Iraq. It wasn’t going to Iran.

            During the 80s, your tax money was being used to subvert Congress and the Constitution by financing the Iran-Contra arms deal.

          • jimdarnall

            The 110 billion dollars going to Iran via the Obama deal is certainly tax dollars. It certainly isn’t coming from Obama’s bank account. You did recently read I hope how Obama is paying for the funding of Iran terrorist groups with that money.

          • I Seigel

            Geez! Where do you get your ridiculous ideas?!? You REALLY need to find out facts before you go spouting off. The money that was just released to Iran, after they were proven to be in compliance with the first parts of the nuclear agreement, was THEIR money that we froze in our banking system when we and the UN imposed sanctions on them. It was not and never was American taxpayer money. If you have proof that what I’ve said is wrong, then please post a link to a legitimate news source and not someone’s blog who just repeats a rumor that he heard (like your “news” that Obama didn’t study Constitutional Law at Harvard).
            PLEASE educate yourself and stop believing what Palin said – that “we’re all going to hell in a handbasket”. Not EVERYTHING that the government or Obama has done is a complete disaster, unconstitutional, or a grab for your money or your freedoms.

          • GQ4U

            Not everything — just most things.

          • GQ4U

            You forgot the tax subsidies for useless ethanol, useless illegal aliens, war on drugs, guns for the drug cartels, lazy welfare recipients, extended unemployment benefits, bankrupt solar panel companies, government motors bailout, Hawaiian vacations for the ‘First Family’, NSA domestic spying, EPA job destruction, Department of Education (that educates no one), TSA 4th. amendment violators, Illegal bombing of Libya, military vehicles for local police, planned parenthood abortions, ObamaCare, guns to Middle East, Section-8 housing, and several hundred illegal executive orders — just to name a few.

          • bobnstuff

            Funny thing if you take all of the things you named and add them up you still won’t have any where close to what is wasted on military spending and corporate welfare. We give money to the rich at a much larger rate then any other group.

          • GQ4U

            I was just filling in some things Seigel omitted. He focused on his perceived wastefulness of conservatives. However, we spend a great deal of money on things we should not. I do not support the military industrial complex which not only consumes vast amounts of tax dollars but also threatens our Constitutional Republic.

            Stop corporate welfare and institute the http://www.FairTax.org plan and eliminate all income taxes & the IRS.

          • bobnstuff

            Do you remember Reagan’s Star Wars defense system. Total waste. The government said it was never built but in fact they did make at least a part of it. I saw if myself being tested by the company that built it before shipping it out. I don’t think I was supposed to see it but the guys working on it didn’t seem to care, in fact they seem very proud of their work. Last I heard it’s sitting on a mountain top in Hawaii.

          • GQ4U

            I don’t know how much was spent on the ‘fake’ Stars Wars Defense system but I do know it is credited with helping to end the Soviet Cold War which costs us many, many Billion$.

            You seem to be unaware that liberals waste just as much money as conservatives — the only difference is where they throw it away,

            I guess Hawaii must be the safest place on Earth with their own non-functioning defense system.

          • bobnstuff

            As far as I know they are using it for research, shooting lasers into space. It really was a cool piece of hardware. The difference between the Republicans and the Democrats when it comes to spending is the Democrats are tax and spend and the Republicans are cut taxes and spend.

          • GQ4U

            I’ll take the cut income taxes approach because eventually that may reduce spending — but only a little.

            http://www.FairTax.org

          • bobnstuff

            With the Republicans cutting taxes doesn’t mean cutting spending or reducing the size of government. History tells us that the democrats are better at reducing the size of government. Look it up if you don’t believe me. Our government today employees less people then we did in 2009 when Obama took office. Look at the latest budget, out of a republic congress.

            That being said I would like to see smarter spending, less waste. Explain to me how a private company that needs to make a profit can do services cheaper the the government. They can’t but we keep adding more contractors. Here is just one example. A sergeant makes around $25,000 per year, way to low but true. Figure with all the other expenses real cost is $50.000 per year. We go to and outside contractor and pay $100.000 to $150,000 for the same person. You can thank dear old Reagan for this one. He pushed for private sector vs. public employee.

          • Roger Martin

            You would rather have a weak military and weak corporations. This would allow our enemies to walk in and take over. Also with a weak corporate structure in this country, were are the jobs going to come from? Have you ever tried to get a job from a homeless person? It sounds like you and Obama, and the Clintons are working on that as hard as you can. Why don’t you just call yourself Obamabot?

          • bobnstuff

            I want my moneys worth out of all we spend on the military, why do we pay people over $100,000 per year to do what the marines used to do for $20,000 per year. Why do we pay civilians to maintain military vehicles when we have members of the military trained to do the job? How is giving Exxon money making our corporate structure stronger? Most jobs are not created by large companies in case you didn’t know. Reaganomics don’t work, never have never will.

          • GQ4U

            Reaganomics does work and always has. Money is like water, it flows down hill to supply jobs. Its true that small businesses employ most of the workers in America but those business thrive in a robust economy and we haven’t had one of those in years.

          • bobnstuff

            If you give a rich man a dollar he puts it away and either tries to hid it from the government or invest it. If you give a person in the middle class or the poor a dollar he spends it moving the economy forward. Our economy is demand driven. If there is no demand there is on growth. Supply side economics has been disproved over and over. The reason the economy isn’t robust is because the spenders of the world don’t have the money, the rich are getting more and more of it and not spending it.

          • Roger Martin
          • KDC

            There is no waste when you spend it on the military. What waste since BO’s been in? He’s cut our military down to nothing!

          • bobnstuff

            You need to check you facts. The military is one of the big cash cows to people like Halliburton. We just rebuilt 200 tanks that the Army said the didn’t want rebuilt because the company doing the rebuilding had a Senator in their pocket. I can go on about just how much money is wasted my our military but you don’t care. We spend more on our military the the next six countries combined.

          • KDC

            All you’d have to do is get rid of the IRS and there’s your money all made back.

          • bobnstuff

            Get rid of the IRS and you have gotten rid of the military.

          • KDC

            No offense, because I don’t know you, but you sure come up with the most idiotic statements.

          • bobnstuff

            You do know that the tax collectors are the people that make government possible. It was taxes that made our constitution needed. Under the Articles of Confederation there wasn’t funding controlled by the central government. It was the need for a national tax collector that created our constitution. No IRS on Military.

          • GQ4U

            You do realize that the Internal Revenue Service and income taxes were created in 1913 and NOT 1787. You do realize that inflation was nearly non existent before 1913 when we foolishly initiated the Federal Reserve system. You do realize that neither of these corporations are government bureaucracies and neither one reports their financial affairs to the US government and neither one has ever been audited.

            If abolishing the IRS will shrink the government down to is constitutional level of limited powers then I am ready for it to be gone now. We don’t need a big brother government and the constitution does not allow for one.

            http://www.FairTax.org

          • bobnstuff

            If we get rid of our standing army we could also save a lot of money. Our founding fathers didn’t believe we needed one so it really needs to go. All corporations need to go also since they were never meant to be long lasting. As for the income tax the 16th amendment created it so it can stay.

          • GQ4U

            1) Right about the standing army.
            2) Wrong about corporations.
            3) The 16th needs to be repealed it directly violates the original intent of our constitution and it is destructive. The IRS is feared and the government is responsible — it flies in the face of liberty & individual sovereignty.

            http://www.FairTax.org

          • bobnstuff

            The IRS is feared because the media tells half truth about them. I have owned a number of business’s over the years and had to deal with the IRS. They are really pretty easy to work with if you go in with the right attitude. The most important thing is not to lie to them. If you lie they are just like your mother and you will get a spanking. No one likes paying taxes but without them we have no country. Even Christ said to pay your taxes.

            Like or not the 16th amendment is part of the constitution but we had income tax before it. Income taxes go back to the Civil War.

            Does the tax code need fixed? YES. Is congress working on it. NO! Every one running for president has a tax plan. Some are well thought out and some don’t add up but they all have them. It really doesn’t make any difference what the President says because it’s congress that passes the laws. As far as I can see the only one running that understand our tax system and how the budget works in Kasich and he stands little chance of being elected. He’s not a good enough at lying.

          • GQ4U

            Not really bob. The income tax revenue is 90% consumed by operations at the IRS. A volunteer tax would likely net as much to the US Treasury.

            I’m no fan of the military industrial complex just the military service.

          • bobnstuff

            Cost to operate the IRS in 2014 was $11.2 billion

            Income tax collected in 2014 $ 1.7 trillion

            Check facts first post second. I believe that the members of our military are the most under paid people in the country and the waste in the military is the worst in our government.

          • GQ4U

            Those numbers do not include the computers, buildings, office furniture, transportation, etc. that the government supplies. They also don’t take into account the annual cost of $500-billion in compliance costs.

            Plus, your numbers can’t be verified because no one audits the IRS. No one audits the FED. These are private foreign held corporations that answer to no one. Neither one should exist in a “free” society.

          • bobnstuff

            The number is the total cost of the IRS and does include all the government costs.

            The Treasury Inspector General for Tax Administration (TIGTA) was established under the IRS Restructuring and Reform Act of 1998 to provide independent oversight of IRS activities. TIGTA promotes the
            economy, efficiency, and effectiveness in the administration of the internal revenue laws. It is also committed to the prevention and detection of fraud, waste, and abuse within the IRS and related entities.

            You do know that through out or government there are checks and balances.
            https://www.treasury.gov/about/organizational-structure/ig/Pages/OIG-Office-of-Audit.aspx

          • I Seigel

            Thanks for pointing that out. I didn’t ACTUALLY forget those, I chose not to mention them. I think these other ones , except for ObamaCare, are pretty much the background noise in any administration, unfortunately. None of the others were started during the current administration or will end in Jan 2017.

          • GQ4U

            I should clarify — by forget, I meant slipped your mind. Based on your previous post I assumed you knew all the things I listed and more.

        • I Seigel

          And the knowledge that Obama gained by studying Constitutional Law at Harvard is the same knowledge that Cruz gained by studying the same subject at the same school. So what makes you think that Cruz wouldn’t have the knowledge and motivation to subvert the Constitution, the same as you insist Obama is doing?

          Like I said, you put a lot of stock in knowing about the Constitution. That’s just one small part of the job.

          • Kenneth Bednar

            Do a search on Glenn Beck for the years just prior to Obama being elected the first time and since them. I viewed the programsadd Obama’s story with the SDA, Tides foundation and many of his acquaintances Is Marxiist, Socialist, Progressive and anti christian. That alone is reason enough to not want is legacy to be how he brought down America. He bad mouths America instead of thanking GOD for being able to live freezer in America. But is background is one of treating down America.

          • I Seigel

            What does any of this unintelligible blather have to do with your comments about the Constitution?
            Could you please reread your comment? What does “live freezer” mean?

          • Kenneth Bednar

            Trouble with computer that auto fills words, sometimes wrong word. I corrected it. Now reads = thanking GOD for being able to live freer in America

            What do my comment have to do with the Constitution. Simple. When politicians do not take the time to see if the bills they propose are acceptable according to the Constitution and leave it to the supreme court to determine the legality of it under the Constitution they are shirking their responsibility. It is little wonder that the liberal minder member of the courts start legislating from the bench which is in it self UN-Constitutional. When a president legislates by executive orders that too is UNConstutional. He knows far well that time is on his side when he uses those tactics and is guilty of violating his oath of office. Here again is where he uses the legal system for its time consuming process. Slick Lawyer type tactics. Immoral none the less. Strait out of Saul Alinsky’s book 12 Rules for Radicals which Obama quoted from when he was in Jerusalem. Read his speech for yourself. ref: http://www.wnd.com/2013/03/obama-quotes-alinsky-in-speech-to-young-israelis/

          • I Seigel

            Thanks for the link.

            I read the quotes. It sounds more like Obama was channeling JFK – “Ask not what your country can do for you, ask what you can do for your country”

            He could also have been channeling the Nobel Prize-winning author George Bernard Shaw, who said, “Some men see things as they are and ask why. Others dream things that never were and ask why not.”

            Saul Alinsky didn’t invent the thought. And Obama didn’t copy the thought from him. Regardless of what any right-wing, biased, anti-Obama website might say.

            You sound like a pretty intelligent guy (who doesn’t proofread his posts very well). Look this stuff up for yourself, like I just did. If you have any kind of an open mind and a willingness to learn, like I do, then you’ll see another side to the story.

          • Kenneth Bednar

            We share the same thought as far as pursuing and seeking out things for our selves. The lectures given by Obama in chicago were based on Saul Alinski, Cloward – Pivens. How to make changes from within the system. Colorado – Piven sought to overwhelm the system so as to cause the downfall of the capitalistic system. Staring an uprising that would force the government to capitulate and make changes to settle the turmoil. In aTV documentary on the histories of Obama and McCain where they moved back and forth between them a parallel timeline they shown Obama drawing the structure of the Apollo Alliance. The structure of a multitude of organizations headed by members of the Tides Foundation were to be in place and prepared to assume control of the failings of the government once capitalism was in disarray. Not a direct overthrow a system of government, but stepping in to fill the void made when the government was unable to carry the weight of an overloaded system. The head and founder/funded by George Soros. Soros can not travel in several countries without being arrested. Countries where he had ruined their economies.

          • I Seigel

            If any of this REALLY mattered, Obama wouldn’t have been elected and re-elected.

            There’s criticism here all the time that every time a conservative complains about Obama, a liberal trots out something that Bush did as an excuse for Obama’s behavior. Right? I’m not going to do that. I don’t really care what Obama did 20 years ago as a college teacher. It’s completely irrelevant to Trump, Cruz, Clinton and Sanders. And Putin and Kim and the Ayatollah and Netanyahu. And the Chinese economy, the price of oil, or the melting of the Arctic ice cap. Nor do I care – AT THIS POINT – that Bush was a military slackard that did everything in his power (or his daddy’s power) to stay out of danger, and that he was appointed to the presidency by the GOP’s Supreme Court judges. Saul Alinsky, just like Monica Lewinsky, is ancient history at this point.

            You DO realize that Obama isn’t running in 2016? He’s held the office the maximum time that the Constitution allows, and now, as is Constitutionally mandated, he’s following the law and vacating the office. Let’s move on to 2016.

          • Roger Martin

            If the senate and the Supreme Court had been doing their job, Obama would not have been able to run for president in the first place.

          • I Seigel

            Uh huh. And Bush should never have been appointed president. So what?

          • reggie

            Troll alert

          • KDC

            You know what he meant. Quit being so obtuse!

          • bobnstuff

            Do a search on who Glenn Beck is. what his education is, then ask yourself why you would that his word on what the constitution means. Then look at were you get the information on Obama’s back ground. Check dates and places. Much of what you believe is based on misinformation and lies. One last thing fined a statement were the President bad mouths America, not what someone said he said but a real quote. I will help you, every word the president says is on WhiteHouse.gov.

          • Roger Martin

            All you have to do is look at the citizenship of Obama’s father. He was a citizen of Kenya. That means Obama is not a natural born citizen. Kenya was also a commonwealth of England. According to British law, that makes Obama a citizen of Great Britain.

          • KDC

            All you have to do is look at America. Look how far he’s been able to tear her down. The proof is in the pudding!

          • I Seigel

            How about Cruz then? Or John McCain? Trump’s Ireland connection? If not born on US soil – in the US or its territories – or in an embassy or consulate belonging to the US, then you’re not a citizen. Is that right, according to your understanding of “citizenship”?

          • bobnstuff

            And Ted Cruz is a Cuban, so what! Last I heard Obama isn’t running for president again so who cares about him.

          • Kenneth Bednar

            Try reading his books

          • bobnstuff

            Read his Bio.

          • Roger Martin

            Better spell check Kenneth.

          • KDC

            Sometimes spell check is the problem. 😉

      • pete G

        How else can you trash it. This was his purpose for studying it.

      • jimdarnall

        Check further and you may find out what he really studied. I just read it the other day and now I can’t remember but it wasn’t constitutional law. I remember it was something different.

        • I Seigel

          It’s a published and undisputed fact that Obama was a “senior lecturer” of Constitutional Law at the Univ of Chicago, and the administration there considered him a professor. Do you imagine that you can be hired as a senior lecturer and have the status of professor if you haven’t studied the subject that you’re lecturing about?? You can read and believe all the nonsense conspiracy theories you want to, but facts are facts.

          • jimdarnall

            I will look again to find the article that disputes that. I am reall y not trying to be a jerk but I did read an article that totally disputed what you are saying. If what you are saying is true that would make Obama even worse than we thought. Personally as little to nothing that Obama contributed as a most the time missing Senator I doubt greatly if he was anything close to whom people thought he was. It really doesn’t matter now anyway because he is who he is right now. Someone many of us want gone.

          • I Seigel

            Apparently Cruz, Rubio and Christie are also MIA when it comes to performing the jobs the taxpayers are paying them to do.

          • reggie

            It’s a troll.

      • GQ4U

        That’s how Obama knows how to circumvent the constitution and erode is legal governing limiting authority.

        • I Seigel

          Oh, well then he’s a smart guy. Maybe other politicians should also study law – rather than ophthalmology or business – so they, too, know how to use (or abuse) the Constitution and get away with it.

          By the way, Cruz, as a Harvard law graduate like Obama, will be just as knowledgeable about how the Constitution works, and he’ll be just as adept at abusing his authority if he so chooses.

          • GQ4U

            He’s a fraud who if elected will be serving illegally just like Obama.

      • Roger Martin

        You are right, Obama knows the constitution. That’s why he has hidden all documentation of his citizenship. He and the DNC know he is constitutionally illegal as president. That’s why they put out false definitions of “natural born citizen”. If you look back to the reason our forefathers put the qualification of natural born citizen in the constitution, you will see the only true definition is “someone born in this country with both parents being citizens of this country”. They didn’t want the commander in chief’s loyalties being divided during a time of war. Like Obama’s loyalties are with the Muslims.

        • I Seigel

          Roger, let’s assume EVERY word of what you said is true. So f*king what?!?!?! He’s been in office for 7 years with one year to go, and you’re still crying the same song you’ve been whining about for 6 years. GET OVER IT AND MOVE ON! There’s more fun just up ahead. You DID notice he’s not running again, right?

      • KDC

        BO sure doesn’t act like he knows it!

    • GQ4U

      If Cruz all about the constitution then why is he attempting to violate the article-2 POTUS eligibility requirement of having to be a natural born citizen?

      • Kenneth Bednar

        Laws change and get clarified:

        Yes Ted Cruz Is Eligible To Be President

        AUG 13

        Posted by Drew

        Contra Ace and Ann Coulter, it’s actually not that complicated.

        Yes, Cruz’s story is a little unique but it’s not even remotely complex.

        Let’s go to the actual law according to the Customs and Immigration Service

        One parent is a U.S. citizen at the time of birth and the birthdate is before November 14, 1986 but after October 10, 1952 The parents are married at the time of birth and the U.S. citizen parent was physically present in the U.S. or its territories for a period of at least ten years at some time in his or her life prior to the birth, at least five of which were after his or her 14thbirthday.If the U.S. citizen parent spent time abroad in any of the following three capacities, this can also be counted towards the physical presence requirement:

        Serving honorably in the U.S. Armed Forces;

        Employed with the U.S. Government; or

        Employed with certain international organizations.

        Additionally, time spent abroad by the U.S. citizen parent while the U.S. citizen parent was the unmarried son or daughter and a member of the household of a person who meets any of the three conditions listed above can also be counted.

        If the child was born out of wedlock, see N-600: FAQ.

        (Note 1/8/16: Since I published this in 2013 the USCIS changed the content on the page I screen capped and linked. I’ve changed the link to the relevant law (see Section G) while leaving the screen cap which is just a summary.)

        Cruz was born on December 22, 1970 so that’s the part of the law that applies to his case.

        Cruz’s mother was born in Delaware and grew up in the US. That covers the 10 years. She graduated from Rice University in Texas, so that would cover the 5 years after age 14 requirement. She didn’t move to Canada until the 60s so she spent more time than that in the US.

        Cruz acquired his citizenship, at birth, through his mother. He is a natural born US citizen and eligible to be President of the United States.

        Let us never have to speak of this again.

        • Roger Martin

          You are talking about citizenship, not a natural born citizen. These are two different things. That is why the founding fathers put that qualification in the constitution for someone to be president. Natural born citizen “Someone born here with both parents being citizens of the United States”. They didn’t want to risk that the loyalties of the commander in chief would be divided during a time of war.

        • GQ4U

          You do not know what you are talking about — period.
          Natural Born Citizens (NBC) predate the US constitution, they were not created by it. Laws may change but the constitution only changes through the amendment process and Article-2; Section-1; Clause-5; has never been amended. So it seems we must seek out the original definition of a NBC which is not very difficult to do if one takes the time to read our historical documents.

          A NBC is a child born in the nation to two citizen parents. If memory serves, Ted Cruz was born to a Cuban citizen father in Canada and as far as I know Canada is not part of our nation. So Ted cannot be a NBC. His mother being a US citizen could bestow US citizenship to Ted if she filed the proper paperwork with the US Consulate in Canada as required by the US Code. Did she ever file the proper papers to verify to the government that Ted was a US citizen? I don’t know, do you? If she did then yes Ted is a US citizen he can serve as a US Senator or a US Congressman. However, he is not a NBC by definition and cannot legally serve as president. Obama serves illegally and look how horrible that has been.

          There are better sources for facts on this issue than Ann Coulter or any other talking heads out there. Learn what a NBC is by reading the definition as written in six (6) SCOTUS decisions dating back from 1814 to 1930.

          Here is a link to enlightenment:
          http://www.art2superpac.com/issues.html

          Here’s a teaser from the Supreme Court”

          The Venus, 12 U.S. 8 Cranch 253 253 (1814)

          “Vattel, who, though not very full to this point, is more explicit and more satisfactory on it than any other whose work has fallen into my hands, says: “The citizens are the members of the civil society; bound to this society by certain duties, and subject to its authority, they equally participate in its advantages. The natives or indigenes (Natural Born) are those born in the country of parents who are citizens. Society not being able to subsist and to perpetuate itself but by the children of the citizens, those children
          naturally follow the condition of their fathers, and succeed to all their rights.

          Proven fact — Obama, Cruz & Rubio are NOT a NBC. They might be US citizens but they are definitely NOT a NBC.

  • bobnstuff

    I can’t believe I’m saying this but Mr. Beck isn’t to far off the truth. The only problem is he doesn’t see the problem with Cruz, He is no leader. His own party doesn’t follow him. He is married to Wall St., and the big banks plus he is another damn lawyer.

  • Hillaryoncrack

    Glenn Beck has got to be the biggest waterhead baby on the planet.

    • Why would anyone be swayed by Glen Beck? Who is Glen Beck to think his endorsement of a candidate is at all that important? “Don’t worry Ted, I’ll give you the nod, and you’re a shoe in”, ain’t gonna cut it! TRUMP 2016!

      • freedomoutpost ken

        Investigate Trump’s past a little more before you vote, talk is cheap, look at what he has supported in the past it gives you a better picture. Results from past actions are always a good guide.

        • YoOleMe

          EXACTLY WHICH ONE of these All Expense Paid (and a little more to boot in some pockets!) NWO / CFR / TriLatComm, ALREADY BOUGHT & PAID FOR Windup Toys OF BOTH THE ‘D’ & ‘R’ HALVES OF THE CENTRAL PARTY, WON’T CONTINUE TO MARCH right over that cliff, INTO THAT ISLAMIC HELL upon the edge of which this Resident White House Squatter has placed this U.S. – EXACTLY WHERE WE STAND, this very moment?!?!?! …

          KEEP!!! Our American Sovereign Future, VOTE:
          The Donald J. TRUMP CARD!!!!

          • freedomoutpost ken

            I will vote for Trump if he wins the primary, but prefer
            Cruz.

        • frank_o_anerican

          You are so wrong, I’ve known Trump for over 30 years, Sure he has changed his mind on some things, So have I and most everyone I know has changed on some issues, We all grow up. If you keep looking in the past you will never have a future. Trump is what you see and what he says is what he is.
          With your outlook a released prisoner would never have a second chance.

          • freedomoutpost ken

            Anyone that can praise Bill and Hillary has no business being President.

      • Carol Burkhardt

        I also don’t like talking badly about a republican but the ONLY thing Glenn Beck really knows about is being an alcoholic! Pathetic narcissistic confidence…

      • Hillaryoncrack

        I agree. Beck is a loser whom no one cares about. FOX fired him for a reason you know.

      • I Seigel

        “Why would anyone be swayed by Beck?” Why would anyone be swayed by Palin? Even Alaskans are shaking their heads in embarrassment that they were once foolish enough to vote for her for governor.

?>

Keep the Fake News Media in check.

Don’t let the MSM censor your news as America becomes Great Again. Over 500,000 Americans receive our daily dose of life, liberty and pursuit of happiness along with Breaking News direct to their inbox—and you can too. Sign up to receive news and views from The 1776Coalition!

We know how important your privacy is and your information is SAFE with us. We’ll never sell
your email address and you can unsubscribe at any time directly from your inbox.
View our full privacy policy.

Facebook Auto Publish Powered By : XYZScripts.com
Google Analytics Alternative