Hillary: Gun Ban ‘Worth Looking At’

by Awr Hawkins | Breitbart  |  published on October 17, 2015

During an October 16 town hall meeting at Keene State College, Democrat presidential hopeful Hillary Clinton said Australia’s confiscation of firearms via a national buyback provides “a good example” for how other countries responded to mass shootings and she said it is “worth looking at” when considering gun policy in the U.S.

Clinton made these statements in response to a questioner who asked if we could ban handgun ownership in the U.S.

Reading from a card, the elderly questioner asked: “[Regarding] handguns…Australia recently managed to take away tens of thousands–even millions–of handguns, and in one year they were all gone. Can we do that? And if we can’t, why can’t we?”

  • Wynn D’rais

    And the murder rate in these countries has sky-rocketed since people, mostly innocent, can’t defend themselves from thugs anymore who have no problem getting weapons because they didn’t give theirs up. WAKE UP PEOPLE, THIS BITCH SHOULDN’T BE A DOG CATCHER LET ALONE PRESIDENT.

  • The Redhawk


  • john jones

    hey you communist bitch go to Australia and run that country. take bill and monica with you.

  • wmagg

    perhaps she should have pushed her gun ban agenda in Benghazi before Obama’s terrorists MURDERED Chris Stevens and three other Americans while she refused to send in support troops. And now she tries to lie her way out of her responsibilities for the men she was responsible for murdering.
    And you thought Vince Foster and Ron Brown were isolated incidences.

  • donemyhomework

    I wish Hillery was on another planet…on the other side of the galaxy.

  • 44mag

    you want some come get some witch

  • rich

    OH YA HILL WHERES BILL TONIGHT?????????????????

  • rich



    Yeah, that just does it…let’s try that in Chi-town – #blackgunsmatter, lol

  • MeForever

    Get your filthy body parts out of our faces and out of our pocketbooks you Commie hoooer.

  • ItsJo

    This Socialist/Marxist Radical of Alinsky(Hillary) who was Her Mentor, wants to turn this nation, into HER ideal of “The Elitists like her and Bill, and the HAVE NOTS, who ANSWER to Her/Gov’t for ALL their needs.” With this continued agenda of Obama, Hillary will have “Total CONTROL/POWER Over -We the People, and the first way is to ‘DISARM THE POPULATION, THEN CONTROL THE FOOD, AND MAKE THE PEONS ANSWER TO US, THE GOV’T REGIME’
    The Clinton’s ONLY worry about amassing their WEALTH, and it’s why they put together “THE CLINTON LAUNDROMAT” where money is taken in by ANY nation, ANY person, ANY business, as they Wash, Rinse, and SPIN(Lie) about the origins, amounts, and think we don’t Know it’s for Favors down the road for these Donors. Little goes to actual global charity, and the ‘Money-Monger Clinton’s keep MOST ALL FOR THEMSELVES.’ She belongs in prison for ALL her scandals she’s been involved in. Of Late, Seems Bill is “coaching her on how to FOOL the people about her newfound personality, etc.” What Fakes!!

  • used_to_be_a_liberal

    Now do you people really think that, our exalted Fuhrer, Heir Obama, his Vice Chancellor Biden, and their favorite pet, the Hilda-Beast, the leaders of the National Socialist Democratic Party, of the late great U S A, these so very tolerant, very caring, people, who are so filled with feeeeelings, compassion, and understanding, and that they have sworn to hold up the Constitution of The U S A or is it the U N, no matter, “what difference does it make”, do you really think that they want to take our guns, and even more rights away. What a very silly thought. Besides, how is it even possible? CNN, MSNBC, and others certainly they must know that this agenda isn’t true, as they are so wise, so brilliant so open minded, and dreadfully honest, wouldn’t they tell us first on “making, breaking news”
    So then, this can not be true, as The Obama Never Lies, and the Hilda-Beast carries no flies.

    • Gnowark

      ‘Tis true that someone so full of sh!t as my former senator should be awash in flies, but I hear the very same unthinking machines that portray obamao as honest, can filter flies from sh!t – namely our distractionary mass media!

      • used_to_be_a_liberal

        so very true

  • Alan

    Why can’t we? Because millions of lawful gun owners would make an awful loud “BANG” should such be attempted. Do people like Hitlery really presume to think that an armed citizenry will go quietly into that “good night”? She’s absolutely bonkers if she believes that. Personally, I’d rather die than be a slave to helplessness.

  • pete G

    Hey Hillary if you would have given some gun protection to the poor soils in Benghazi they would still be alive.

  • pete G

    Keep talking Hillary i am hoping this is what keeps you’re Socialistic a$$ out of the white house. Anyone who would entrust you or Obama with their gun is an all time fool. Neither one you care about guns just the power you have over the people when you take them away, you are fooling no one.

  • Roy Miller

    Look at New Orleans! After Katrina, troops went
    door to door confiscating the citizens weapons. The very people that needed them the most. Not one gun was returned. GO BILLARY!!!!!!!!!!

  • David Teel

    Recently our Dear Leader commented
    that the U.S. ought to look at Australia as a model for strict gun
    control, i.e. confiscation. Australian author, and fellow Liberty
    Alliance partner, Nick Adams would like to set the record straight with an open letter to the president about Australian gun laws.

    Dear Mr. President,

    You recently hailed “Australian gun laws.”

    In doing so:

    you praised a government for forcefully removing all semi-automatic firearms from its populace,

    you admired the banning and confiscation of guns.

    We expect to hear that from a European leader. But not you.

    You’re the leader of America:

    the world’s first free country,

    the nation that has inspired many to be free,

    that has protected the freedom of others,

    that has spread more freedom than any other.

    I am an Australian and I must set the record straight.

    The “success” of the 1996 Australian gun reform is a myth.

    The only thing achieved was to take away the guns of the law-abiding,
    leaving only the criminals armed. Is this what you wish for America?

    In Australia, if a citizen has firearms, the police have a right to
    search their property without a warrant any time. Does that sound like

    The laws you praise outlawed the Daisy Red Ryder BB Gun that my
    father played with as a child. Now you need a special permit, gun safe
    and serial number. For what?

    There are just as many guns on the street today. Gun crime is no lower.

    In Australia, mass shootings have been a rare event. If
    strict gun laws mean no massacres, explain Britain’s Cumbria shootings,
    Monkseaton and Dunblane. Or Anders Breivik of Norway?

    Gun laws achieve very little.

    Mass shootings are about illness, not guns. Any other so-called “gun
    issue,” if there are any, is related to the breakdown of the family,
    cultural decline and the age of entitlement.

    The Second Amendment defines American exceptionalism. It speaks to
    the character of America, and reflects why America is America.

    Civilian disarmament is based on the assumption that people are
    irresponsible (unless they work for the government). America was founded
    on the opposite premise.

    Don’t make America a namby-pamby society.

    The right to bear arms is not wrong nor unnecessary. It is:

    the greatest test of genuine freedom,

    the best protection of you, your family and your property,

    the ultimate deterrent against government overreach.

    The Constitutional right to bear arms is pivotal. The American idea is a value system. If you take away the guns of America, you take away America.”

    You can read the rest of Nick Adam’s letter here at Joe For America.

    But I will close with this. I always say “An armed man is a citizen. An unarmed man is a subject.”

  • tom2

    Australia? The results are just now coming in. Here are a few facts. Most so-called “gun deaths” in the U.S. were suicides and as most know, suicide will take the path of least pain. But the fact is the U.S. suicide rate is only slightly higher than Australia’s (1.25 times), about the same as our slightly higher overall crime rates (1.19 times) and America’s slightly higher quality of life (1.13 times). But the population density in the U.S. is 12.1 times higher, a statistic that often is quoted by sociologists as a causative factor in crime statistics, suicide rates and quality of life. Japan exemplifies the disconnect between firearms and suicides. Japan has almost no personal firearms ownership, yet its 2014 suicide rate is almost double the US rate. They simply use other methods.

    Since 1990, Australia’s homicide rate has decreased by nine percent compared to a decline in the U.S. by 39.4 percent. Since 2001, Australia’s armed robberies declined by one-third compared to 18.5 percent in the U.S. I used these periods because they’re the ones often cherry picked by leftists interested only in making their point. For example, since 1990, robberies in the U.S. have declined by 46 percent, a figure never cited by leftist media. And they never mention the fact that firearm sales tripled simultaneous with a significant decline in all the recorded crime categories. The undeniable downside to Australia’s confiscation effort is during the past 10 years, recorded assaults increased 40 percent compared to a U.S. decline of 16 percent. And during the same period, sexual assaults in Australia increased 20 percent compared to a 15 percent decline in the U.S. A direct comparison of murder rates isn’t possible because illegal aliens murder large numbers of citizens annually in the U.S. while the number of illegal aliens are negligible in Australia.

  • JB Wright

    Yeah sure, this worn out old piece of hide will just print up some more money and buy millions of guns back, Well guns are good for a few things. one of them being to shoot the people who try to take the guns away.

  • Art Hock

    We ought to ban you ugly looking witch. You and the rest of your criminal family should all be in prison, and that includes that phony daughter of yours.

  • Joy Smart

    She’s as nuts as Obama! With all these “refugees ” we need to be able to protect ourselves!

  • Daniel Wright

    I’d like to see her try to ban guns from the jail cell she’e going to.

  • Seedman

    The only “ban” I am currently interested in is Hillary Rotten Clinton’s from political office by voters, for the general good of America.

  • PC Bob

    The PROBLEM with the Australian gun grab, is the same that we have here in so-called ‘gun free’ cities: The criminals, the drug dealers, the down right THUGS of society STILL HAVE THEIR GUNS! So, all you are doing is leaving hard-working law-abiding citizens helpless and undefended against these CRIMINALS! WHY are the liberals and other assorted Progressives so obtuse? Haven’t they learned ANYTHING? Of course, THEY will retain THEIR paid (by taxpayers) gun-toters for THEIR protection, because they KNOW the police can’t (or won’t) do it! Just how stupid do they think we are? No, how stupid are WE if we allow them to pull this fast one on us? If SHE gets in the WH then you know where our hard-earned rights will go? Right down the toilet, putting us back AT LEAST 240 years! Thank, thank you, Mr. president!

  • Walt

    Gun laws in Australia
    From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

    Gun laws in Australia
    became a political issue in the 1980s. Low levels of violent
    crime through much of the 20th century kept levels of public concern about
    firearms low. In the last two decades of the century, following several high
    profile multiple murders and a media campaign, the Australian government
    coordinated more restrictive firearms legislation with all state

    A common misconception is that firearms are illegal in Australia and that no
    individual may possess them. Although it is true that Australia has restrictive
    firearms laws, rifles and shotguns (both of which include semi-automatics), as
    well as handguns, are all legal within a narrow set of criteria.

    As of 2015 about 815,000 people had a gun licence in Australia and there were
    around 3.5 to 5.5 million Registered Firearms in Australia. Most people own and
    use firearms for purposes such as hunting,
    controlling feral animals, collecting, security work, and target shooting.
    Hillaryous will say anything to avoid her email scandal!

    • Gnowark

      Thanks for your parting ‘shot,’ hitlery evading her f-ups by ‘smoke and mirror’ distractions, it worked on me until I read your post and remembered. Vince Foster (another ‘ancient’ pre-presidential run scandal).

  • Downdraft 94

    BENGAHZI….less we forget!

  • Daniel M. Vallo

    She uses any angle to endear poor saps to vote for her. Recognize her as the lying conniving POS she is. God help this country if. She is President

  • cathylovesyou

    I think Australia has loosened up and the same amount of Guns are back in Freedom Seeking Citizens possession. Hillary is a big liar and so insincere in her actions, her speech and to the casual National Socialist Democrat, deaf and dumb. If you had a child that was always being investigated and accused of wrongdoing, would you take notice and get help for them, well now it is up to good Americans to help get her help.

    • Gnowark

      I say help should come in her very own 10’X7′ size, for a period not to exceed her lifespan (if she shows good conduct).

      • cathylovesyou

        Good one, Justice will never be done while the present Liar in Chief is in the White House

  • After reading what these people below wrote here. I believe it is THEM that are the greatest danger to the United States. No one is going to take our guns. President Obama has sold more guns than any other sitting president due to the “fear tactics” of the NRA. Y’all keep sending them more of your hard earned money and drown in their Kool-Aid. As far as the hatred you spew here about our laws, my suggestion is to leave, there are literally hundreds of flights out of the United States daily, climb aboard!

    • Webb

      Please take the time to Read the different laws being passed in Washington State, California and New York and Connecticut!
      These laws Are not “Fear Tactics”…They Are Facts!
      Regardless of what you think of the NRA, it’s one of a very few Checks And Balances against Gun Control…
      Our Greatest Danger to America and Americans Rights…Is people with your type of Thoughts…

    • keith

      You must be drinking the liberals kool aid as you are blind to what the democrat agenda is about. The gun control agenda is being spouted everyday. Can you not understand that disarming the population we would soon be a third world country. You are nothing more than a SHIT STAIN on the constitution.

    • nonstopca

      Ever hear of the 2nd amendment……..who is “spewing hate of our laws” I think the one who should be leaving is you. maybe Australia would be a better fit. and maybe you should listen to Obama, on guns, he does want to take my guns.

    • Daniel Wright

      Are you denying that Hillary said what she said? Obama’s answer is confiscation. He has tried to ban ar15 ammunition twice.through regulation. Every time a gunshot is heard he calls for new laws or threatens us with executive action. Is it true that you think that Obama is using the NRA’s tactics to sell more guns. Do you think he is getting a cut of the profits?I suggest that YOU leave because you don’t back the one law that protects all gun owners rights. The second amendment. Any law that takes our gun rights away is illegal and unconstitutional……..PERIOD!!!-

  • Smitch

    They just DON’T GET IT! They are NOT going to take our guns! She wants to wipe her fat ass with the Constitution of the United States of America. “FROM MY COLD DEAD HANDS”

  • Ken V

    Does this idiot think the criminals would actually sell their guns ? Hillary probably would get shot herself if she tried to take our guns. This woman is delusional and a danger to society.

    • cockroach

      If Hillary isn’t careful she will get civil war started ,That is what she wants.If I remember correctly When bill and hillary left the white house in 2000 they stole everything they was loose.if she gets elected it will be the same thing all over again.So to conclude if will be safer for the Clintons if no one has a gun That is what is called protecting your ass.

  • Webb

    “WHATS WORTH LOOKING INTO IS…Never having Hillary as President Of The USA!
    She, like all Progressives, See America…As A Gunless Nation!
    Conservatives…Remember this statement alone, should equate to A No Vote for any Democrat!
    Will our Nation remain FREE…

  • TexRancher

    Once a government takes something away from you be it property or RIGHTS, you NEVER get them back! As for Australia and Great Britain, their gun confiscation FAILED. Check out their published reports on homicides and armed assaults. UP! They’re not happy about losing their gun rights especially the Aussies!

    Let history speak for the issue: Every dictatorial take over was preceded by disarming the citizens! So what Hillary, Obama and the rest of the gun grabbers (mostly former democrats) mean is, guns for us none for the people.Slaves) Why do you think Obama wants his own private army that answers only to him? Check it out, it’s in OBAMACARE! His calls it a “stabilization force”. Additionally, he now wants to bring in foreign troops to mingle with our local and state police. Think that’s a good game?

    • Raymond Dobos

      That would be Un-Democratic,another selfie…

    • actor44

      Was it Madison who said ” If there is a second class citizen it is the gov. employee ” ! When more reverence is given to the asshole down the street than you have for your own family,and your own self respect just because he/she/it was elected to some ” Office ” that you surrender your Rights , subjugate your family’s future, then that person/people are cowards, fools,and absent of all integrity .

    • Michael Hazel

      Hell no! I think when Obama invites foreign armed troops onto American soil it may be too late to defend ourselves. When such a proposal is made impeachment should be immediate.

  • Sylvester Jones

    Australia has changed their mind on gun control. We are being infiltrated by millions of criminals armed to the teeth, who the hell side is she on?

    • Gnowark

      If that were true (changing mind), why hasn’t it been repealed? Oh, maybe just another example of once a government takes something away from you, you NEVER get it back. If you don’t use your Rights, you will LOSE THEM. FIGHT NOW!

    • Raymond Dobos

      Australia, an already commited country,farther than the colonies too

  • Holy Joe

    Mrs. Clinton was promised the Presidency in 2016, by Obama for stepping down in 2008 in his favor. The Preisdency should not be anyone’s to own as a personal fiefdom to bequeath and guarantee to anyone. The best thing to do would be to ban Mrs. Clinton, she is determied to hand over what remains of the U.S.A. to one man Communistic Rule after Obama’s one man rule and total avoidance of both Congress and The Constitution for the past seven years and the finishing touches he intends to do to it in his last year of one man rule.

  • kiss my fat white -ss hillary!!!!!

  • mdrod1


    • you beat me to it!! thanks!

    • used_to_be_a_liberal

      Hey, you said bitch, you can’t call her a bitch, she is the Hilda-Beast, a bitch is a female dog in heat, that is serving a purpose, and doing something use-full. How can you possibly lower a female dog to her level, We have to stop comparing her to any kind of animal or reptile, as they are all well above, and beyond her.

  • mike

    for one reason we the people were protected with our rights by our fore fathers. they were a whole lot smarter that the commie POS’s we have now. she had 4 hero’s that died under her protection, who the hell is she to try to take our weapons and the bill of rights away. F you killary.

    • podunk1

      Everyone in congress and the judiciary are oath bound to defend the Constitution as Supreme Law against any enemy of it without any reservation or purpose of evasion (Article 6 & 2nd oath)! Obama, Hillary, and their progressive organizations are engaged in acts of insurrection against the Constitution, rebellion against oath and country, and aiding/abetting other non-oath-bound enemies! Those acts include issuing illegal executive and regulatory orders of law along with fraudulent claims of “equal protection of the law” where no legitimate law exists… then using them to usurp and overrule Supreme Law with enforcement powers by executive and judicial decree instead of ratified amendment!

      Amendment 14 Section 3. “…No (oath bound) person shall … hold any office… (who has) engaged in insurrection or rebellion against the (Constitution), or given aid or comfort to (its) enemies…” unequivocally automatically bans Obama, Hillary, and any other oath bound person from holding ANY US office. IT IS SUPREME LAW! Where is Congress??? If Congress and every court in the nation doesn’t defend as required (Article 6 & 2nd oath) they’re betraying oath duty to protect TRAITORS!!! Citizens have a right and obligation to use due process and defend THEIR CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS!

      • mike

        poDunk1: I would like to use your comment to send to some senators and congressman, very good job.

        • podunk1

          Thanks, They’re free publicly stated research & thoughts – seeds intended to be planted & bloom with the freedom and civility God gave us, to plant over and over again. It’s yours to quote or own.

          We must purge the evil within that which governs us without reservation – it doesn’t take a majority to do it.

  • jerry

    Australia doesn’t have a Constitution guaranteeing the right to keep and bare arms!!!
    Our Founding Fathers were extremely intelligent and well educated.
    They knew the importance of self protection, and the need to protect against tyranny!!!!!!
    I’d rather look at that; than her: If we’re just looking at stuff.

    • Raymond Dobos

      rightly so on tyranny, all the dukes and duchesses having selfies!

    • Michael Hazel

      Independence may at times need to be defended.

  • Anyone who still supports this evil, criminal whore has only proven they are too stupid and ignorant to argue with, not worth spitting on, and certainly cannot call themselves Patriots, but of course, the Democratic Party of LIES has never been known for love of our Nation! Never forget, the Democrats deliberately kicked God from their Party in 2012, Twice! They are the Godless Party, now ran by satan/allah/Hussein/Hillary! All four nothing but fecal maggots of insanity!

  • EKMcM

    Before this article, I was thinking that I wouldn’t be voting for Hillary. Now after this article I know that I WILL NOT VOTE FOR HILLARY.

    • Ricarrdo estavans

      It took this one article for your consideration. Talk about a one issue voter. What about all the other scandals.

      • Gnowark

        Don’t you recall? When my former senator is caught, it’s Bush’s fault, or any convenient Republican(s). Talk about your whacko conspiracy theorist, hitlery certainly is.

    • nonstopca

      I’m very glad you’ve seen the light, but it really took this article? what about the rest of her terrible views of your country and way of life?

Google Analytics Alternative