Pay-to-Play: Multiple donors to Clinton Foundation met with her while at State Department

by FOXNews.com  |  published on August 24, 2016


More than half of the people outside the government who met with Hillary Clinton while she was serving as secretary of state gave money to the Clinton Foundation, either personally or through or companies or groups, according to a review of State Department calendars released to the Associated Press.

At least 85 of the 154 people from private interests who met or had phone conversations scheduled with Clinton donated to her family charity or pledged commitments to its international programs, according to the documents obtained by the AP.

The 85 donors contributed as much as $156 million combined, and at least 40 donated more than $100,000 each while 20 gave more than $1 million.

Republican Vice Presidential candidate Mike Pence reacted Tuesday to the AP report while campaigning in Pennsylvania, saying it was not a “laughing matter.”

“Hillary was on Jimmy Kimmel last night, joked about it, said her emails were boring. Hillary Clinton this is not laughing matter, nobody is above the law,” Pence said. “American people are sick and tired of pay to play.”

  • Bob

    She has been using the USSC decision in the VA case against McDonnell as a basis that she did nothing wrong. However, the VA case was brought that he violated VA laws, not necessarily US laws, by granting access to donors. US Government laws are different than state laws. We are back to the 90’s, where it depends on the meaning of the word “is”. She grants “access” and not “favors”. Money was for “leverage” and not “ransom”. And I love how they have re-defined the word “transparency”? After all, she has obviously agreed with Peter Brimelow as he re-defined the term “racist” to mean “winning an argument with a Liberal”.

  • Katie Jones

    She is not off the hook. This is one thing that the America people will not tolerate. She and Bill are in deep trouble this time. This has been a STACKED up of dead bodies who have known them (no proof yet on these dead) and all this money which has turned into their god. They will do anything for their god (Money) . Ok you can therefore go to jail for your god – money! That is where everyone else is who worship their god money….

  • Kanawah

    Pay to Play sounds like the Nixon Reagan and both Bush whit house procedure as well as the republicans in congress. If you do not donate big, just go away.

    • rifftop

      Obama………you seem confused………Obama is the one selling the “Lincoln bedroom” to his stinking Alinski cohorts.

  • rewindpulaski

    I’m just wondering how many of her “donors” are currently “anti-Trumpers”? Follow the money… Just follow the money… Her latest name – given to her by our British cousins – is harsh – – but appropriate… It should be out there for all to see on a daily basis…

  • CBUJAN

    Americans Apathetic About Being American

    True patriots are an endangered species. Not long ago, it seemed as though most Americans were at least somewhat patriotic and respected our military and our national symbol. Now, we’re lucky if American citizens aren’t indifferent to their own country and what she once stood for. And this level of apathy is permeating throughout all aspects of society, it seems.

    And this is the apathy that plagues America. The Greek philosopher Plato said, “The price of apathy towards public affairs is to be ruled by evil men.” And as Floyd recently pointed out, “There’s always a power-hungry person intent on stealing your patrimony.” But Americans simply don’t care.

    Last month, Public Policy Polling reported that 41% of the Americans polled think that the Benghazi mess is one of the biggest political scandals in U.S. history. But get this: 39% of those people don’t even care enough to know where Benghazi is on a map. And

    When it comes to Benghazi, most Americans have an out-of-sight, out-of-mind attitude. Recently, Pew Research Center reported that only 23% of Americans said they were following the scandal “very” closely, while 21% reported that they were following the story “fairly” closely. And according to a recent Gallup poll, only 54% are following the IRS scandal. What about the rest of America?

    Americans Are Too Busy to Be American?

    In May, Bill O’Reilly conducted his own survey of Americans, questioning people in New York City about Benghazi and IRS. He found that Americans are “distracted” and “don’t have much time to absorb information.” He boiled the results down to one thing: “It’s no surprise to me that literally half the country has no blanking clue about how the Obama administration’s running things. And you know what? Many of those people don’t care.”

    And as Floyd showed us earlier this week, many Americans don’t even care about their Fourth Amendment rights or the NSA scandal. They have nothing to hide so who cares if the government snoops through their emails, text messages and phone records?

    The Real Consequences of Our Apathy

    The real problem is that the apathy doesn’t only affect America’s response to political scandals. It affects our involvement in the political process. The 2012 presidential election saw the first decline in voter turnout, especially among young voters, since 1996. Roughly 41% of voters between the ages of 18 and 24 participated in the election – a 7% drop since 2008. Only 64% of women voted, while just 60% of men cast ballots. Apathy hinders citizens from being informed and voting according to that knowledge. If we don’t care enough to understand the political process and to be involved in it, how do we hold the government accountable? And how do we keep an already too-big government from growing even more?

    The evidence of this epidemic is out. It’s sweeping across our nation, and has Americans nonchalantly relinquishing their liberties to an out-of-control government. And if we think that apathy and sideline antics are what’s going to ensure we salvage the liberties that we’re already seeing ripped away from us, we’re in for a severely rude awakening.

    Hellary must not be president if you want your country back.

    • rifftop

      you are completely correct……..could not have said it better

  • Dan

    She’s a disgusting excuse for a Presidential candidate. And she’s taking the American people for the fools they are and all of those who are supporting her.

  • EG

    Serious question, guys, don’t crucify me, but why is this a huge
    problem? The 154 people are from private interest, the article
    says. A person CAN wear multiple hats. Me, for example, I’ve got a corporate job that needs me to put in way more than 40 hrs a week. I also have a small farm, consult, do (unpaid) work for my county conservation commission and volunteer for things with the church (it has admittedly been a while, LOL). All of these responsibilities share the same 24×7 calendar. At any given time and day, I could be doing any one of these things, and by the grace of God things actually get done (to varying degrees of success). I figure if I were an executive at a charity in addition to other tasks, I would take the time to meet my large donors too. It’s just polite. I haven’t heard in this so far that she shirked her SoS duties in meeting with these 154 donors to the charity (I have no idea what the charity does, but it does have a 501(c)3 tax tatus, so it’s legal at least). I haven’t heard so far that
    official foreign dignitaries had to pay as a condition of meeting the SoS, something like for example the only way the Polish Ministry of Foreign affairs could get a meeting with the Secretary in her role as Secretary was to pay. That would definitely qualify as “pay-to-play” and would definitely be corrupt. Have any of you guys heard that this occurred?

    Have we learned that these donations shaped any official State Department
    policy? If yes, I can see the problem. If no, I struggle to see the outrage. If she were a city mayor for example and she met with charity or campaign donors and a few of these donors “coincidentally” win no-bid city contracts, that would definitely be corrupt. Have any of you guys heard that this has occurred?

    Every politician – far left, far right or centrist – has personal, business and occasionally spiritual lives outside of their public service job. I can’t call meeting with a VIP from outside the public service job, or even a large campaign donor, as corruption in itself. It does get sketchy when those donors get government jobs, contracts and favors though. If we’re outraged about Clinton meeting with a charity donor VIP, while serving as SoS, should we also be outraged when Trump meets with charity donor AND Trump Organization corporate client VIPs when he’s serving as President? Like Clinton, he’s also a multitasker. I’m sure he’ll still be involved with the corporation while President and will also meet with large donors to his or his kids’ charities.

    • PC Bob

      The problem is, she was doing these things on SecState’s time! She actually MET with them at her work! I’m sure you don’t do your consulting and county commission work at your corporate job/office, do you? Hillary did! She also accepted donations there! THAT is where the huge problem lies! Then there is also the problem of accepting donations from foreign nations! THAT is a huge red flag! There are just so MANY things wrong with Hillary’s methods!

      • I Seigel

        I can’t understand why this is all such a big deal.

        A report came out earlier this year that a typical Congressman or Senator spends roughly 25 hours a week raising money for his/her next campaign. Over HALF of their paid weekly time – paid by you and me – is given over to raising money. HOW do they raise money, you ask? Well, they meet with donors. They also meet with lobbyists who donate. Is it illegal? Apparently not. So why is Clinton any different?

        If the donations influence policy or votes, that’s one thing. Meetings with donors – whether in their official office or at a social event – is hardly illegal and very common throughout the Federal government and every level of state government, too.

        • rifftop

          Because Clinton was NOT AN ELECTED OFFICIAL AS SECRETARY OF STATE………SHE WAS APPOINTED AND WAS EXPECTED TO PROTECT THE NATION’S SECRETS, DIPLOMACY AND DIPLOMATS. She failed and apparently could not comprehend her duties. It was not her job to maintain lobbyists, donors. She was not a congressman or senator during this time…duh!

          • I Seigel

            They all take the same oath of office – to protect and defend the Constitution. DUH!

          • rifftop

            so you made my point…….if she is supposed to uphold “official” standards…….takes the same oath as a congressman……..what makes her exempt from complying with protecting the nation’s secrets, not making sneaky deals on the side by using her office as a selling point. In fact she is expected to be MUCH MORE CONSCIENCIOUS OF OUR SECRETS AND PERSONNEL…….BUT FAILED OVER AND OVER. She had authority over a large overseas/diplomatic group, more than any congress member……but quite obviously is a lousy manager and completely indifferent to other government employees……..yet her private CLINTON GLOBAL INITIATIVE FOUNDATION TOOK LOTS OF TIME AND ATTENTION FROM HER AND HER MUSLIM AIDE …..HUMA ABEDIN…….WAKE UP AND FOLLOW THE SMELL AND YOU WILL ARRIVE AT THE PILE OF SH.T SHE REALLY LIVES.

          • I Seigel

            “…what makes her exempt..?.” Huh? Who said anything about being exempt? I said she follows the same rules as other elected (and appointed) officials (and officers).

            Send me a memo when ANY of the countless investigations of her results in an indictment. Until then, I can safely claim that you’re full of SH*T.

      • EG

        Well, that’s the thing, what time is SecState time? It’s a job with long, but fluid hours. It’s not that one punches a clock and says “I’m going to do Secretary work from 9am to 5pm, then call it a day”. I’d imagine it can take up your nights and
        weekends and dinner plans and school recitals, little league games, etc. It’s a 24 hr job, and you have to fit things
        into the schedule whenever you can. I myself do have office hours, but my corp job is project based more than clock based. Even as I take a moment to “goof off” and enjoy this visit to 1776, it’s after well after 5 here and I’m working on a project with a client in New Zealand, with my eye on the deadline rather than the punch clock. There’s 24 time zones on Earth. I’d bet the SoS is having to work even more wacky hours than I do doing the global work the job requires.

        As far as me meeting people that aren’t part of my main job in the middle of the traditional work day, I can say that I’ve met non-corp people maybe near my office, but not very often AT the office. One of the perks of being the boss, I reckon.

        I certainly wouldn’t want my SoS selling Amway during the middle of the day, but I do understand that executive level people do sit on the boards of other things. I was surprised
        when I first learned that a few years ago, but have come to accept it as a common practice, that for example, my corp CEO might not only run the place I work, but also sits on the board of another company or foundation or two and
        those meetings are not on Saturday mornings. With Trump saying that he’ll be bringing in the “best” people, I’m thinking that he’ll extend invites to other corporate people and this type of multi-hat type leadership is going to continue. The best corporate people make millions of dollars per year. They probably won’t “settle” for a couple of hundred thousand in a government job without trying to hold on
        to outside non-government related contacts and relationships. It’s the Russian contacts Manafort had that forced him resign as campaign manager if they were going to take this current attack strategy.

        Accepting donations AT the state department? Hmm, imagine Clinton accepting a check or even more comically a big ol’ bag of cash, then going to the bank to deposit
        it. I’d figure if you’re an executive at a multimillion dollar foundation and you have staffers, the staffers are running the day to day job of taking and processing donations. Meh, I suppose it is possible she was accepting the big ones herself in person, but I hadn’t read that this was the case. Perhaps you’ve seen something I haven’t.

        I’d also read that the foundation accepted money from foreign nationals and foreign charities. The charities possibly acting as proxies for those governments. Saudi Arabia in particular. That IS a bit sketchy. We’ll see as more info is revealed if that led to a shifting of policy and/or granting of favors. I do know that I’ve been in jobs before where it was strictly forbidden for me personally to accept gifts from vendors over a certain value. I would have gotten in trouble for it, so yes, I can see the problem with this one.

        Also, as Glenn Beck used to say, follow the money. As an executive of a 501c3 non-profit charity, you are allowed a salary that is a “small” portion of the donation. I’m real curious if the Clintons took a salary from the foundation.
        If so, that makes it even more shady for me. I see that the director of the Foundation took home $104k. I doubt that either Clinton has a director role. To be determined though. At least she’s made her taxes available so the work can see.

      • EG

        Oh, and thank you for your reply, by the way.

  • Tiger

    There is more than enough to take H and O out but we all know that won’t happen. Time for the American people to face the facts that O owns the Main Media, the DOJ, FBI, CIA and all. Time to wake-up to the facts that while Americans watched the Kardashians and BS that is now TV and their children went to colleges that hate America and their little ones go to Public Schools that teach them how awful America is, the Communist Progressives have pulled your Republic right out from under you.

    Now what are you going to do about it? Well when the fox has devoured the hens and has all his brothers with him what can you do? Anyone out there still think Americans vote in presidents? I got swamp land fer ya.

    • rifftop

      all we can do is try to influence people around us to wake up….if we succeed with 2 or 3 to change into learning what you have said…….we might salvage the nation. Just like the human body…….the nation now has to fight off this INFECTION/DISEASE OF PROGRESSIVE/LIBERAL/SOCIALISM.

      • Tiger

        That disease if allowed to swallow our Republic will be felt by all the lowlifes in our country and then they will cry out and it will be too late.

        They get what they asked for. Me and mine can leave. We will.

  • justinwachin

    If she was a Republican, the news media would be on this story non-stop. They would have guests talking about resignation, impeachment, criminal charges, etc. Since this was committed by the Democrat presidential candidate the media has decided that there is nothing newsworthy about this.

    The reality is the Clinton family has grown wealthy off selling America to the highest bidder. To make matters worse, they have pocketed the money rather than putting it into the federal treasury.

    Hillary Clinton is a picture of total corruption. If elected president she will be a corrupt tyrant on a level that Barack Obama can only aspire to reach.

    • I Seigel

      If you haven’t been watching, the news media IS all over this story nom-stop. Ad nauseum.

      • rewindpulaski

        Not near enough… I want to see this thing go all the way to Sunday (when the liberal morning talk shows such as “Meet the Press” broadcasts)… Any bets on how many “anti-Trumpers” and “liberal progressive press” are on Hill’s pay-to-play donor’s list? Stand by for all to add to you “ad nauseum”… …as a “Trumper”; welcome to my world…

        • Crystalrcote3

          <<hp.. ★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★::::::!il913r:….,……

      • justinwachin

        I must have missed their extensive coverage. This hasn’t been covered enough. Ms. Clinton used her position as secretary of state as a personal money maker. Maybe if she would have spent more time doing her job the world would have been in better shape when she left the job.

        • I Seigel

          Your comment could apply to ANY Congressman or Senator. What’s the difference? Where’s the crime?

          • justinwachin

            It could, but does it? What congressmen are running a non-profit foundation and using it to collect money in exchange for access and political favors? In the past some congressmen have been caught doing this sort of thing. Some went to jail. Others were retired by the voters back home.

          • I Seigel

            As I said in a previous post, Congressmen and Senators spend roughly 25 hours EVERY WEEK raising money for their next election. How do they raise money? They meet with donors, lobbyists, and other people that have “business” with the government. Some of these people might even be from their own districts! Imagine that! That the office holders are actually meeting with constituents, rather than just businesspeople who want to influence policy. But I digress…

            So, these officeholders spend over HALF of their working hours – on salary, which you and I as taxpayers are paying – meeting with these lobbyists and donors and other “favor-seekers”. They meet in the Congressman’s or Senator’s official offices, at social events, business meetings, etc.

            How is that different from Clinton meeting or speaking with donors – NOT TO HER OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF STATE – but as a principal in the Clinton Foundation? Who’s to say which donor or lobbyist to which officeholder is influencing whatever policy? Some, like the governor of North Carolina who gave sweetheart deals to Duke Power to pollute at will, are pretty obvious in their criminality. But the vast majority is just business as usual.

          • justinwachin

            The campaign donations don’t usually wind up in the congressman’s personal bank account. The politician has to give an accounting of campaign funds to the Federal Election Commission.

            Secretary of State Clinton’s donations went into the family’s foundation. We don’t know what happened to those funds. We do know they do not have to meet the same reporting thresholds as political campaign accounts.

            If the Clintons want to release a list of the donors to their foundations and the cash disbursements for their donation we can see who profited off the access they purchased.

          • I Seigel

            The Foundation is not her “personal bank account”, and its finances AND taxes are open. Can you say the same about Trump’s??

          • justinwachin

            Once investigators look at the Foundation’s books they will be able to see whether the Clintons used it as a personal bank account.

            So far Donald has funded most of his own campaign. He is filing election reports that show where his campaign’s money comes from and how it is spent.

          • I Seigel

            And until the investigators look, what you and all the other right-wingers are doing is guessing and making up conspiracy theories. Is that about the gist of it?

          • justinwachin

            I’m going on the reports of the recently discovered emails where donors were able to meet Ms. Clinton once their checks cleared the mail. As Hillary put it years ago, the seriousness of the charge makes this something which should be investigated.

          • rifftop

            you mean like USING THE IRS ILLEGALLY TO SCREW AROUND WITH THOSE NOT OF THE LEFT WING? How about a good investigation of the 200 funded groups that puke bag Soros funds in the US? How about some IRS audits of him? He’s a big Obama and Clinton banker.

          • I Seigel

            Looks like Soros gets audited just like your boy Trump and like Romney. But just like all those other rich guys they pay comparatively very little in taxes because they take advantage of all the loopholes. Legally.

          • rifftop

            since you miss the point entirely, I’ll stop discussing this issue. Often left wingers miss the premise of a comparison and create their own which ends the debate……..like here.

          • rifftop

            WRONG! That Ponzi scheme THE CLINTON GLOBAL INITIATIVE FOUNDATION…..is offshore. It’s not regulated by the IRS or any US agency. ONLY THE CLINTONS HAVE TO REPORT INCOME THEY TAKE FROM IT……That being those ridiculous speech fees that are done domestically and foreign, The Clintons have been using the foundation as an expense account to travel and pay for all their little bribes and extortions. While the “Clinton Cash” book put a bright spot light on the corrupt foundation…….the writer specifically avoided making criminal claims as he was not a lawyer and wanted to avoid a libel suit……however the mass of circumstantial evidence was so over whelming ……a serious legal investigation using his info……could build a case and indict the Clinton mob. To keep making excuses for this rotten group is the ultimate idiocy of denial.

    • Kanawah

      Compared to Reagan and baby bush, Hillary is an angel.

      As stated above, every republican sense Nixon has run the Pay to Play game.

      • justinwachin

        I don’t recall hearing that either president mentioned had a private foundation/money laundering operation which people contributed to in order to meet the president. Just because Hillary gets caught doing something crooked doesn’t mean everyone else is doing it.

        • rifftop

          no most ex presidents did not………maybe a library fund, or some charity they like……..such as veterans causes. Even a private enterprise…….doesn’t reach the level of fraud and corruption of the Clinton creeps. They were prepped by Soros in setting up foundations with the right offshore coverup, the right tax exemptions and the constant money moving and people moving to avoid scrutiny.

      • rifftop

        Wow ……insanity is the norm here…….Nixon’s little 18 minute tape erase and a pointless breakin to a campaign office is like a joke compared to the billions the Clintons have bilked…..and the lives gone. From the days of Arkansas………the Clintons have a trail of dead bodies…..civilians who got too close. Watergate is like robbing a candy bar compared to the Clintons selling out the US by using their positions to get money…sell uranium, and all the nasty little deals they have personally got paid for.

      • rifftop

        you have judgment issues, or values dyslexia or some kind of childish tit for tat objective……..so if others did wrong (although extremely less ), that creates an excuse and permission for the current characters to not only replicate bad actions, but take them to a massive level of corruption such as the Obama/Clinton gang? I noticed this is a constant liberal “value factor” anything anybody else has done that was less then good, becomes a precedent for the lefties, socialists to really go to the extreme …….be it bribery, taking foreign donations, robbing tax money to give to fake green companies who then go bankrupt, to sell illegal weapons to gangs, to sell uranium to the Russians without any oversight, to make useless deals with Iranians, then pay them for hostages, to print money as a budgetary balance, to migrate thousands of 3rd world bottom feeders who bring in disease, gangs, murderers to attack US citizens……….and on and on……….Hillary is a bitch, a lying POS, even her “legal” backround sucks……fired from the Watergate group in the 70’s, proud of getting a rapist of a 12 yr old girl off with a real light sentence, insider trading, filegate, travelgate…………on and on……….a string of dead bodies from Arkansas to Benghazi. She is a filthy Marxist, using women, minorities and anybody to retain power and control for her psychotic goals. She truly is a female copy of Obama.

    • rifftop

      exactly……..the double standard…….reinforced by the dem party, the media and even the educational system has created a miserable political atmosphere. Liberals hugely ignore the crimes, insults, theft, corruption by their party hacks……..but will attack conservatives or republicans if the “use a word ” incorrectly. The Clintons are the perfect example of pure CORRUPTION, EVIL, FRAUD AND HATRED FOR THIS COUNTRY.

  • DrBillLemoine

    We must remember that government and business operations abroad are expedited with bribes against the law in America. Any payments to CGI may have been intended as bribes by them but there’s no evidence of any influence bought via meeting with Hillary. There is NO quid pro quo anywhere and certainly lawyer Hillary knows this, do you?

  • teaman

    I can’t for the life of me understand why you keep reporting this crap when there isn’t anyone in our Nation with big enough balls to go after the witch with a capital “B”.

    • PC Bob

      Because, teaman, we keep hoping to WAKE UP some of the sleeping giants in DC who DO have the balls and power to do the job! Until then we will CONTINUE to yell and scream for justice! We will get it, too!

      • teaman

        Oh, so you do know some with balls. How about naming them!!!!!! I am not talking about a politician who runs the mouth and at the end of the day does nothing.

      • I Seigel

        Like Trey Gowdy. He has Tea Party Balls, and his committee couldn’t find anything actionable against Clinton. And remember, his committee was originally formed to investigate Benghazi. The emails were a side issue at the time.

    • rifftop

      that is the main problem……..a useless congress, judges etc. BUT LET’S FACE IT …….NOT THIS JUSTICE DEPARTMENT (LYNCH) OR THE FBI OR ANY BODY IS GOING TO INVESTIGATE, INDICT OR ANYTHING AGAINST THIS CROWD. Obama gone could help. It is why she must not be elected, then a new AG ……and new cabinet members can pursue a criminal investigation against those two rats.

  • Anouk

    AH! Hillary said her emails were boring!!! What about her being boring as well if these so called emails are coming from her.
    This is getting indeed boring to see how corrupted the Clintons really are and getting away with murder.
    No morals and integrity. Just lies and hypocrisy.

  • Rodney Steward

    And half of these donations came from terrorist countries that are our enemies, thanks to her top muslim slave, Huma! But as we have all said, NOTHING will be done, she’s a GOD apparently! This is TREASON in the first degree!

    • bobnstuff

      We know this how? Trump has business interests in those “terrorist countries”.

      • Rodney Steward

        Proof of Hellary is ALL OVER the NEWS, prove Trumps!

        • bobnstuff

          Just what Terrorist nation came to see Clinton when she was Secretary of State and give her money? Trump brags about bribing people. Trump is knee deep in the Middle East.
          https://mic.com/articles/130070/here-are-some-of-donald-trump-s-middle-east-business-ventures#.iLVzXljfv

          • rewindpulaski

            But only Hillary has been given the appropriately applied title of “Islam’s Whore” – by the Brits… Must be a reason.. To answer the first question you’ve presented – just look up the inner workings of the gov’t of Bahrain…

          • I Seigel

            Could you please post any link to substantiate what you say? Who in Britain has used the expression “Islam’s Whore”? When? I want to see the source you’re using for your “news”.

          • rewindpulaski

            google Russo, Islam’s whore, and Hillary… You’ll find it… by the way; I use a lot more sources for my news… I’m so crazy, I even read the NYT and the LA Times… …and the occasional “Globe” and “Telegraph”.. try that one on for size Seigel… by the way; guess which one I used to find out about Hillary and her extensive use of Diazepam? bet you you can’t guess…

          • Rodney Steward

            Saudi Arabia is one, U know, the country that lives by Shariah law! Name a terrorist country that hasn’t visited the brown clown, and when Hellary was Sec., she was right their, and that’s all that’s been on the news is Hellary’s foundation and all the countries that have donated, most from the sand land!!

          • bobnstuff

            You mean the country that Trump wants to defend?

            http://thehill.com/blogs/ballot-box/presidential-races/264748-trump-we-made-iran-a-power

            Do you mean the country that bail Trump out when he went bankrupt?

            http://www.ibtimes.com/donald-trumps-bankruptcies-saudi-prince-alleges-he-gave-republican-money-candidate-2407704

            Do you mean the country that gave money to the Clinton Foundation to support healthcare for their people.

          • Rodney Steward

            Yep, the same country that keeps U up!!

          • rifftop

            you are the perfect example of what is the “low information” person……but beyond that like most lefties, cannot make reasonable comparisons or differentiate people and their positions. Trump’s business actions…..good or bad…….WERE UNDER THE PRIVATE CITIZEN/ENTERPRISE WORLD, WHILE MADAM HILLARY WAS A GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEE WHO ABUSED, MISUSED her position for personal gain, corruption, money laundering, conflict of interest and gross negligence. Try to comprehend the difference of Hillary selling 20 percent of US uranium to Russia, useless nuke deal with Iran(she worked on it before leaving)……that all concede is a failure, lying about Benghazi (the bogus video), screwing up Libya, here and Obama installing a muslim brotherhood rat(Morsi) into Egypt (which Egyptians smartly tossed out), dragging in thousands of diseased, illiterate migrants from south of the border, Somalia, Syria. These migrants not only infect our own kids in school, but hide gang members, drug runners, terrorists………BUT you idiots think Trump’s bankruptcy crap is a bigger deal??? You actually ignore the fact that Huma Abedin a devout muslim is working to make the US better??? You think that Valerie Jarrett an Iranian is working to protect the US….from predators??? This is why you liberals look stupid……..you cannot equate valid issues to each other. The muslims brought in by this regime are NOT VETTED…….there are no records in shit holes like Somalia or Syria…….nothing to BACKROUND CHECK. But you lefties spew this nonsense about how they are checked. Lying is the best talent of the democratic/socialist party. The sheer volume of deceit, corruption by Obama/Clinton is enough to jail them……..if somebody had the balls, guts and concern to go after them……maybe after they are out of office completely. You dims compare the selling out of the US to Trump not paying some flower or laundry vendors in casinos he owned over a decade ago. Clinton’s Global Initiative Foundation is a blatant scam…………again just nobody is going to investigate or indict. Who would do that………the AG Lynch who is a hack for Obama? Of course not… nobody in this government is going after Clinton……since they are all paid hacks. This is why Clinton is fighting so hard to get back to the white house…to stop all investigations, suppress all information and hire compliant rats like her to keep all the details out of the press. Clinton foundation is a fraud…….first example…….$5billion collected for Haiti………..nothing done……..Haitians still living in tents, still a wreck from earthquake damage years ago. Lots of foreign criminals have been hired by the foundation for 2yr intervals…..then move on. ……..Stopping here……….since it’s a waste of time to debate liberals …….they have FACTS DYSLEXIA.

          • bobnstuff

            You will believe just about anything your are told, you never checked anything. You say that Clinton sold Uranium to the Russians but when the deal went down she was a Senator and had little power over the deal. You make it sound like the deal was a straight sale but I’m willing to bet you know none of the details because all you can do is repeat the misinformation you are feed. You are so easy to fool. What do you real know about any of the things you spout? Everything you say are talking points that are either twisted, half truths or out and out lies. As I keep saying I’m not a big Clinton fan but the lies being thrown around are just to much. The republicans have been going after Clinton for 30 years and have spent millions and millions of tax dollars but keep coming up empty. Either Clinton is that smartest person in the country or there never was anything to find. Do you think she is that smart?

    • rifftop

      YES IT IS…….this didn’t happen yesterday…….the leftists have been working on this agenda since after WWII…….gradually they infiltrated ivy league colleges, state colleges, high schools, now down to grammar school. The unions, the media…..all infected with PC liberal crap that has twisted the minds of students and citizens into believing some self loathing, guilt trip about being an American. It is the only nation that plays this self blame game on itself, but it was taught to now at least 2 generations of students who enter the world, poorly informed, unable to compare forms of government, analyze historical events in the context of their times……….and then we have a treacherous regime that agitates various ethnic and minority groups into some vengeance activity and ferments chaos, anarchy.

      • Rodney Steward

        This is just like Hitler did, start them out young, and we’ll be the ones that’ll have to deal with this sh$t before long, and the Gov. will lead them around like cattle, straight to the FEMA camps!

        • rifftop

          for sure…….some things in human history repeat themselves over and over. Again this is why learning history, causes, effects has value to avoid the redundant mistakes of mankind. We see it in our general lifespans……..70-80 yrs. Some of us see the same crap happen over and over even earlier in life because we either studied past conflicts, wars, foreign events, history and cultures……..but today that has been nullified and we have a dumb population. Hitler understood grabbing hold of youth, indoctrinating them to sustain his Reich. The Commies have done it for decades……get those little Chinese, Russian minds in line to be good comrades. It works as long as each generation does it to the next. Then you see it pop up in other nations that were not previously under a commie or fascist collar. Venezuela is one, Cuba became one and some others. The Mideast and its sharia law is also the same inhumane form of governance that subjugates people to the maximum. I have been proposing that the west change it’s view of Islam…….from not being a religion to being designated a form of government or political system. Since many nations use sharia law as their national “constitution” or legal system……we should now register Islam as a political system…….much the same as communism, Nazism, fascism etc…….it is a throwback form of government with extreme oppression, degradation and inhumane treatment of people in general , especially those of other cultures.

          • Rodney Steward

            Islam is not a religion any way, it’s a cult, a sick belief, and I don’t know any countries that have adopted it! I know some of these countries that have been over run by these gutter rats, the rats want Shariah law, when if fact they should be neutralizing the rats!!

  • Climax

    Both Clinton’s are insane with the power and money trip. They feel that they are above the law and nobody can touch them as they play out their power and money games across the globe. Their web of lies and corruption will become so complex that it will fail and when it does the only answer is to charge, convict, and put them away for the rest of their natural (that is if they are) lives.

    • I Seigel

      “Both Clinton’s are insane with the power and money trip.” And Trump and his family aren’t??!!??

      • rifftop

        Playing the website idiot isn’t going to work. Comparing the Clinton IN GOVERNMENT ABUSES AND CORRUPTION IS A FALSE COMPARISON TO TRUMP’S “PRIVATE BUSINESS” ACTIONS. Like it or not……he wasn’t using tax payers money, nor selling out a government position, exposing national secrets, killing Americans or jeopardizing US troops, diplomats and workers. Clinton is a vile, treacherous leech.

    • rifftop

      absolutely, but because the Justice dept and others are filled with Obama hacks……..nothing will happen to Clinton. Their values and hatred for this nation will not change. Also the population is infected with dumbed down liberals, socialists and now a crop of illiterate, murderous illegals, muslims whose purpose is to attack from within. All from the actions of this disgusting regime and its rats.

  • bobnstuff

    In four years only 154 people meet with Clinton? That’s less then one a week. I really am not much of a Clinton fan but doesn’t that number seem a little strange to anyone else. Only 154 people wished to meet with her in four years but she got 45,000 emails. Strange!

    • cmi

      You’re right,……something sure doesn’t “jive” about that!!!

      • bobnstuff

        The average donation was $1.8 million but they say only 20 give over a million. so those 20 sure must have given a lot. This whole story seem a little fishy. The other problem is we don’t know when the money was given or if the visitor got anything other then a handshake. The other question is was Trump one of the visitors since he brags buying favors. How did we end up with such bad candidates.

        • PC Bob

          Just luck, I guess??

  • Holy Joe

    So 85 out of 154 persons wishing to Contact the then Secretary of State, the greedy and avaricious Mrs. Clinton had to pay up a total of $!56,000.000 to their false Charity/Personal Fund in order to meet with her or speak one on one with her over the telephone. This is a series of outright crimes whilst in Federal Office. Something that no one else in the entire United State of America would even contemplate doing let alone committing it. She thinks she can do anything criminal or unethical as the rules do not apply to her or her equally sleazy mate who behaved just as irresponsibly while he was in the Whitehouse. I would venture to suggest that they both enjoy duping the fools that vote for them ………………….Suckers all ! But they will both get away with this latest revelation of their rabid dishonesty as they are being protected
    by the AGO, the DOJ, the FBI and the equally dishonest and unethical Obama himself with his Executive Orders & Directives to the other Federal Legal Offices. This latest really shrieks for Impeachment of the whole damned rotten lot of them.

  • jcfriday

    Just another criminal activity by these corrupt lying political hacks that belong in a jail house rather than the White House. Lock them both up and throw away the key.

    • cmi

      They need to just put a damn electrified fence around DC,…..hell, they’re ALL crooks,….especially the democrats!!!!!!!

      • I Seigel

        Or maybe, just maybe, they should limit the amount of money – and time – that’s necessary to run for office, like they do in England. Campaigning starts 6 months from the election, and campaigns are funded by tax dollars. No SuperPACs, no bullsh*t about Citizens United First Amendment crap. And term limits. Money, and the continual raising of it while in office, will become a thing of the past. Maybe this is the ONE issue that liberals and conservatives can agree on??

        • rifftop

          LaRaza, Black Panthers, Black Lives Matter and all the other anarchistic groups need to be investigated as to where their funding comes from (we already know). Also muslim organizations need to be reclassified from religious groups to political. Since many countries use Sharia law as their governing system, we need to view it as a governing, political system and remove religious rights from it. It does not deserve 1st amendment rights or any other right. It is no more deserving of consideration than the Nazi party or KKK or Communist party. Since it provokes murder, incites anarchy and refuses to respect any western laws or constitution, it should be deemed an enemy entity. You have to be a moron to open your doors to any individual or group that tells you directly it wants to kill you. But again the US is full of dumbed down morons.

Google Analytics Alternative