Supreme Court to weigh constitutionality of Arizona public campaign finance law

by
November 30, 2010

By Robert Barnes, The Washington Post

The Supreme Court will again review government efforts to regulate campaign spending, agreeing to consider an Arizona law that distributes subsidies to publicly funded candidates who face big-spending opponents.

The decision was not a surprise, as justices in June had blocked a portion of the state’s 12-year-old Clean Elections program, which authorizes public money for state candidates who bypass most private fundraising. The court stopped the state from providing “matching funds” to those candidates, which become available when political opponents or outside groups spend in excess of state limits.

It will be the court’s first foray into campaign finance regulation since its controversial 5 to 4 decision in January in Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission . That ruling said unions and corporations could spend unlimited amounts from their general treasuries to advocate for and against candidates.

Opponents of the Arizona law say it also unconstitutionally limits the free speech of privately funded candidates and groups, who they say are forced to cut back their spending to avoid enabling their opponents to receive more public money.

The outcome of the case could have enormous consequences for public campaign finance efforts, which are based on the notion that providing public funds for campaigns reduces the potential for corruption that can come with private fundraising.

Campaign finance expert Richard Hasen of the Loyola Law School in Los Angeles wrote in a blog post over the weekend that matching funds are one of the best incentives for coaxing candidates to accept public financing.

“The whole point of the extra matching funds in the Arizona plan is to give candidates assurance they won’t be vastly outspent in their election,” Hasen wrote.

“While an adverse ruling by the Supreme Court . . . would not mean that all public financing systems would be unconstitutional, it would eliminate one of the best ways to create effective public financing systems.”

To read more, visit: http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/11/29/AR2010112902701.html

No comments yet - you can be the first!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Keep the Fake News Media in check.

Don’t let the MSM censor your news as America becomes Great Again. Over 500,000 Americans receive our daily dose of life, liberty and pursuit of happiness along with Breaking News direct to their inbox—and you can too. Sign up to receive news and views from The 1776Coalition!

We know how important your privacy is and your information is SAFE with us. We’ll never sell
your email address and you can unsubscribe at any time directly from your inbox.
View our full privacy policy.