GUN CONTROL: CA LEGISLATURE TO CONSIDER 10-YEAR BAN

by Awr Hawkins | Breitbart  |  published on August 19, 2015

On August 19 the California legislature will take up a new gun control measure, Senate Bill 347–a bill designed to expand the reasons for which California residents can face a 10-year ban on gun possession.

SB 347 is sponsored by state senator Hannah-Beth Jackson (D-Santa Barbara). In 2014 Jackson praised legislation that put “Gun Violence Protection Orders” in place, thereby allowing the state to temporarily deny Second Amendment rights to Californians whose families, friends, or co-workers believed they were a threat to themselves or others.

The Gun Violence Protection Orders last one year while the legislation Jackson will push on Wednesday bans gun ownership for a decade. Numerous misdemeanors already result in 10-year bans on gun possession in California, and the NRA-ILA reports that Jackson wants that ban to cover transfers of firearms to a family member without undergoing a background check via a licensed dealer.

  • Bill Douglas

    Take all Federal Funds from California ad le the stink and muck sink in the ocean. Better still give them and Puerto Rico independence.

  • ADRoberts

    They think it is a good thing that ANYONE can just stand up and say a lie or the truth and by doing so take away a persons constitutional rights for 10 years.
    And where do they get that this is NOT a violation of the words “shall not be infringed”
    They should be put in jail for TREASON for trying to break the Constitution.

  • Richard Schwartz

    Legislators are stupid. They don’t understand that any legislation passed if not liked will be ignored. Here is a great example. Gun control legislation. Record numbers of guns changing hands. Got to a flea market,craig’s list or the internet. Power of legislation!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
    Happen to notice how people are rejecting pro immigration? The numbers keep growing, wonder why? Are democrats in trouble? Is Obama about to have more problems? Maybe. Seems upset people do get some results. Now people must be convinced their long term elected maybe aren’t working for the people who elected them. Lobbyists won’t have jobs for all who are not reflected in ’16.

  • donemyhomework

    Typical democrat bull.

  • teaman

    Do you know what would work best for Californication? Kick all Dummycrats, perverts and ILLEGALS out!!!……..you can throw in wife beating, kid raping, and head chopping islamic pukes as well!

    • Paul Dragotto

      WE HAVE HAD NO HEAD CHOPPING IN CALIFORNIA. THE ILLEGALS GET THERE JUST DESERTS. THERE ARE KID RAPIST AND WIFE BEATER IN JERK WATER USA . MUST BE WHERE YOU LIVE.

      • teaman

        I was just covering all bases and NO we have none here. I bet you would love some “jerk water”, fits well in Californication!

      • oldvinnie

        Quit yelling Paulie!

        • mousekiller

          It is not surprising that all the 1st ,2nd and 6th amendment rights that are on the lips of people to be taken away are all promoted by Democrats. It seems that the democrats don’t like freedom. They dont like voters to vote for what is right.They have enlisted the dead ( zombies if you will) to vote many times in ea election . Dam shame too. I saw one democrat 2 days ago that looked pretty good in a bikini. Then it turned around and it had horns and a scraggly beard.. Dang it.

      • The duck

        We have no sanctuary cities here and Californicator does have and the illegals kill rape and maim and no one cares except the families who are victimized. Lovely state to be from I’d say.

        I’ll stick with our constitution thank you and defend my family from Californicators.

      • Bill Douglas

        You are a IDIOT Paul!

Google Analytics Alternative