Gun-rights groups hope Trump nixes Social Security role in background checks

by
January 17, 2017

Social-Security-may-strip-gun-rights

Second Amendment advocates hope President-elect Donald Trump will reverse a new rule by the outgoing Obama administration under which the Social Security system could be used to block gun purchases for thousands of benefit recipients.

“We’ve already made the request to the Trump administration to look at repealing this,” Erich Pratt, executive director of Gun Owners of America, told FoxNews.com.

The Social Security Administration finalized a rule in December under which the agency would submit information to the National Instant Criminal Background Check System (NICS) on recipients of disability insurance and Supplemental Security Income (SSI) if the government determines they are “mental defectives,” or unable to manage their own affairs.

Gun control groups insist the government should take action to keep guns away from the mentally ill, citing the recent airport shooting in Fort Lauderdale. But critics of the SSA rule contend the system could use overly broad criteria to end up denying guns to “harmless, law abiding” people with no history of violence.

One concern is how a similar program has worked at the Department of Veterans Affairs, which has been reporting some veterans to the background check system when they have been unable to manage their own financial affairs. The VA reported the names of more than 257,000 military veterans who couldn’t manage their finances. A 2012 Congressional Research Service report found 99.3 percent of all names reported on the background check system as “mental defectives” came from the VA.

  • Tiger

    PPPPFFFFFFTTTTT if mental mental evaluations were required for Public Office all the Demonrats, or rather Progressive/Communist/Socialists would be out of work.

    George Phillips , an elderly man from

    Walled Lake, Michigan, was going up to bed, when his wife told him that he’d left the light on in the garden shed, which she could see from the bedroom window.

    George opened the back door to go turn off the light, but saw that there were people in the shed stealing things.

    He phoned the police, who asked

    “Is someone in your house?”

    He said “No,” but some people are

    breaking into my garden shed and

    stealing from me.

    Then the police dispatcher said “All

    patrols are busy, you should lock your

    doors and an officer will be along when one is available”

    George said, “Okay.”

    He hung up the phone and counted to 30.

    Then he phoned the police again.

    “Hello, I just called you a few seconds

    ago because there were people stealing things from my shed.

    Well, you don’t have to worry about

    them now because I just shot and killed them both; the dogs are eating them right now,” and he hung up.

    Within five minutes, six Police Cars, a

    SWAT Team, a Helicopter, two Fire

    Trucks, a Paramedic and an Ambulance

    showed up at the Phillips’ residence,

    and caught the burglars red-handed.

    One of the Policemen said to George,

    “I thought you said that you’d shot them!”

    George said, “I thought you said

    there was nobody available!”

    (True Story)

  • justinwachin

    You have to admit that this could cut down on the size of the welfare rolls if the government ever started using them to deny gun ownership, drivers licenses, etc.

    • AKLady2015

      Denying drivers’ licenses to the impoverished would be like cutting off your nose to spite your face. It would depreive them of the ability to seek work, let alone hold a job.

      • justinwachin

        It would also encourage some to get off the government roll. The local housing project announced they were going smoke free. Several of the residents called the TV station and complained about losing their ability to smoke in their housing projects apartments. One man said that if the government didn’t rescind the policy he was going to move.

        As I watched this I thought, good for him! Every person we can get to live independent of the government is a good thing.

        I hope President Trump reforms welfare to the point that it encourages people to leave the welfare rolls. I have no problem seeing the government phase out benefits for those willing to become independent. In the end they will become a taxpayer who doesn’t look to the government for their sustenance.

        As for taking driver’s licenses it will never happen. It is also unlikely that President Obama’s policy change is going to keep guns out of many hands.

        • AKLady2015

          You must have meant to say Fuher Trump.
          In the once free America, Congress made the laws.

    • bobnstuff

      Are you aware that most adults on public assistance have jobs and work? We even have a large number of people with guns on welfare, they are our military families because we pay our service men and women so badly that they can sign up for food stamps.

      • justinwachin

        The point I was making was that some people who are currently on welfare might be encouraged to wean themselves off welfare if it takes away too many of their freedoms.

        We need to pay the military better. In my younger days when I was considering career options I looked to see what the military was paid. I figured America’s defenders were paid a pretty good salary. I was shocked to see how little they were paid.

        Hopefully President Trump will revise some welfare policies so that they will encourage people to transition from welfare to independent taxpayers. The current system puts a lot of barriers up that penalizes people who try to become independent.

        • bobnstuff

          I hope Trump can understand the real problem and work to fine a solution. I have a very broad background and have work with a lot of people getting public assistants. What I know is in the case where they can have a job they do, they wish they could make enough money to get off assistants but they can’t for a number of reasons. Most of the welfare money goes to the elderly, the young and the disabled. Most of the rest goes to the working poor. You can only be on assistants for a limited time if you are able to work. That rule has been around since Bill Clinton was president. In the case of the working poor we need better child care and a higher minimum wage. If you are an adult working 40 hours a week you should be making enough that you don’t need welfare.

  • Jean Langford M.

    AS WELL HE SHOULD REVOKE THIS ASININE GUN GRABBING LAW…IT IS A SLAP IN THE FACE TO SENIORS AND VETERANS….LEAVES THEM DEFENCELESS IN THE EVENT OF HOME INVASION..AND OPENS THE GATES TO HORRIFFIC LAW SUITS FOR DEFENDING YOUR FAMILIY..

    • Tiger

      Don’t believe for one minute these people defenseless gunned up to the teeth and ready willing and able to use those guns. Most guns since O are not registered. But the program is full of holes and sure that Trump will take it out.

      George Phillips , an elderly man from

      Walled Lake, Michigan, was going up to bed, when his wife told him that he’d left the light on in the garden shed, which she could see from the bedroom window.

      George opened the back door to go turn off the light, but saw that there were people in the shed stealing things.

      He phoned the police, who asked

      “Is someone in your house?”

      He said “No,” but some people are

      breaking into my garden shed and

      stealing from me.

      Then the police dispatcher said “All

      patrols are busy, you should lock your

      doors and an officer will be along when one is available”

      George said, “Okay.”

      He hung up the phone and counted to 30.

      Then he phoned the police again.

      “Hello, I just called you a few seconds

      ago because there were people stealing things from my shed.

      Well, you don’t have to worry about

      them now because I just shot and killed them both; the dogs are eating them right now,” and he hung up.

      Within five minutes, six Police Cars, a

      SWAT Team, a Helicopter, two Fire

      Trucks, a Paramedic and an Ambulance

      showed up at the Phillips’ residence,

      and caught the burglars red-handed.

      One of the Policemen said to George,

      “I thought you said that you’d shot them!”

      George said, “I thought you said

      there was nobody available!”

      (True Story)

      • Jean Langford M.

        I DID NOT MEAN TO IMPLY THAT THEY WERE NOT “PHYSICALLY” ABLE TO DEFEND THEMSELVES WITH GUNS..I SAID THE “SOCIAL SECURITY LAW” LEFT THEM “LEGALLY UNABLE” TO DEFEND THEMSELVES..AND THAT IT WAS A GUN GRABBING RUSE BY THE TRAITOR IN CHIEF..PLEASE READ THE INITIAL POST AGAIN MAM…ALSO AS TO THE BIKERS GUARDING THE SWEAR IN OF TRUMP..I SAID: “IT IS HARD TO KEEP TRACK OF “ROSTERS” AS TO WHO KNOWS WHO IN THE PARTICIPATION OF THE BIKERS >>>LEADING TO A SECURITY HOLE WHERE ANYONE COULD SLIP THROUGH SECURITY FOR ASSASSINATION OR OTHER DEADLY PURPOSES…” HAVE A GREAT WEEK MAM…

        • Tiger

          You also.

          Threatening the President of the United States is a class E felony under United States Code Title 18, Section 871.[1][2][3] It consists of knowingly and willfully mailing or otherwise making “any threat to take the life of, to kidnap, or to inflict bodily harm upon the President of the United States”. The United States Secret Service
          investigates suspected violations of this law and monitors those who
          have a history of threatening the President. Threatening the President
          is considered a political offense.[4] Immigrants who commit this crime can be deported.[5]

          Because the offense consists of pure speech, the courts have issued rulings attempting to balance the government’s interest in protecting the President with free speech rights under the First Amendment to the Constitution of the United States. According to the book Stalking, Threatening, and Attacking Public Figures,
          “Hundreds of celebrity howlers threaten the President of the United
          States every year, sometimes because they disagree with his policies,
          but more often just because he is the President.”[6]

          The prototype for Section 871 was the English Treason Act 1351,
          which made it a crime to “compass or imagine” the death of the King.
          Convictions under 18 U.S.C. § 871 have been sustained for declaring that
          “President Wilson ought to be killed. It is a wonder some one has not done it already. If I had an opportunity, I would do it myself.”;[7]
          and for declaring that “Wilson is a wooden-headed son of a bitch. I
          wish Wilson was in hell, and if I had the power I would put him there.”[8] In a later era, a conviction was sustained for displaying posters urging passersby to “hang [President] Roosevelt”.[9]

          • Jean Langford M.

            I HAVE NEVER BEEN VISITED, CONTACTED, OR CONFRONTED BY THE SECRET SERVICE FOR “ANY VIOLATION” OF THE CODES YOU HAVE SPECIFIED…LOL…LOL…SO IF THIS IS YOUR WAY OF THREATNING ME TO KEEP MY FINGERS SEWN TOGETHER YOU HAVE FAILED…I HAVE NEVER MADE A “DIRECT” THREAT TO ANY PRESIDENTT PAST, PRESENT OR FUTURE….I SUGGEST YOU LODGE A COMPLIANT WITH THE SECRET SERVICE IF YOU THINK A THREAT HAS TRANSPIRED BY ME…HAVE AT LADY…

          • Tiger

            You seem to be on edge and showing your fears I never threatened to turn you in.

            Awww there is the rub.

          • Jean Langford M.

            LADY..GET THIS LOUD AND CLEAR….I “FEAR” ABSOLUTLY NOTHING..YOU PRESUME TO MUCH….AFTER TWO COMBAT TOURS IN VIETNAM AND HAVING BEEN WOUNDED –4– TIMES YOU CAN ADVANCED “NOTHING” THAT WOULD OR COULD MAKE ME AFRAID OF…. IF THERE IS A “RUB”…IT IS “NOT” IN YOUR PAMPERED EXPERIENCE THAT WOULD EQUAL THE TERROR IN MINE….PROTEST TO MUCH…?…NO I THINK NOT. YOU WROTE THAT PEIECE ABOUT THREATS STARTING OUT WITH..”YOU HAVE”..DO YOU NOT REMEMBER?..GO BACK IF YOU WILL AND READ YOUR OWN WORDS…IT REALLY DOES NOT MATTER..HAD YOU “HAD” THE INTENT AND FOLLOW THROUGH TO NOTIFY THE SECRET SERVICE…IT WOULD HAVE AVAILED YOU NOTHING…IT WOULD HAVE ENCOURAGED A LAW SUIT AGAINST YOU FAILING TO GET A CONVICTION..STATRTING WITH DEFAMATION OF CHARACTER AND I AM SURE MY LAWYER (S) WOULD HAVE ADDED SUBSTANTIALLY TO THOSE CHARGES AGAINST YOU…FURTHER MORE …DO YOU “NOT” KNOW THAT THE “NSA” MONITORS FOR THESES KINDS OF DOMESTIC THREATS AGAINST A PRESIDENT?…I GUESS NOT..HUH ?

          • Tiger

            ARMY NURSE OVER HERE SERVED IN TWO WARS. MY FATHER IN THE DEATH MARCH, MY GRANDFATHER A CONSUL BANISHED TO SIBERIA FOR RUNNING AN UNDERGROUND TO GET INTELLIGENTSIA OUT AND MY MOTHER BORN IN SIBERIA. MY PEOPLE SINCE 1300 FOUGHT AAINST KINGS, QUEENS, DICTATORS AND COMMUNISTS. AFTER TWO WARS AS A COMBAT NURSE I FEAR NOTHING. NEVER WAS PAMPERED. PLEASE GO FOR IT YOU PIECE OF SHIT.

          • Jean Langford M.

            OH WE GOT PROFANITY PEA BRAIN..GO SUCK ON A HORSES ASS MOUTH FULL OF SHIT…FUCK OFF WHORE FOR A MOUTH…YOU JUST TURNED INTO A WORTHLESS TROLL…FUCK OFF BITCH…

          • Tiger

            YOU SURE KNOW ABOUT PROFANITY YOUR POST SHOWS YOU WROTE THE BOOK. YOU ARE THE HORSES ASS FULL OF SHIT AND YOUR MOTHER AND YOUR WIFE WHORES THAT IS WHY YOU USE THAT TERM SO EASILY.

            HEY ALL YOUR BOOST AMOUNTS TO NOTHING AND YOU SURELY AREN’T ALONE WITH INJURIES FROM WARS AND THOSE MEN WERE REAL HEROES NOT BURNED OUT BRAINLESS PIECES OF SHIT LIKE YOU.

            YOU MOST LIKELY KNOW PUSSY SINCE THAT IS WHAT AN OLD SON OF A BITCH LIKE YOU HAS TURNED INTO AND THAT IS WHY YOU ATTACK A WOMAN ON HERE.

            EAT DOG SHIT AND DIE. TROLL.

          • Jean Langford M.

            PISS OFF TRPLL CUNT….YOUR DISHONORED RANT IS NOT WORTH MY YIME…

          • Jean Langford M.

            YOU INITIATED THE PROFANITY AND YOU GOT A BLAST OF IT BACK IN YOUR SHIT HOLE MOUTH…PISS OFF TROLL…

          • Tiger

            YOU ARE THE ASSHOLE AND I DON’T HAVE A SHIT HOLE LIKE YOUR FAMILY TREE SO TAKE A HIKE PISSY OLD MAN

          • Jean Langford M.

            IS THAT YOU ALL HAVE TITLESS?…YOU CAN’T EVEN KEEP YOUR WORD TO LEAVE THIS SHIT ALONE..GO BLOW SOMEBODY..THAT SHOULD KEEP YOU BUSY FOR A YEAR OR TWO…PISS OFF TROLL…

          • AKLady2015

            A miracle has taken place, I actually agree with you!

          • AKLady2015

            Suggest you obtain a mental health provider.

          • Jean Langford M.

            I SUGGEST YOU GO FUCK YOURSELF DUMBASS…PISS OFF TROLL…

          • AKLady2015

            Are you stamping your foot to go with the screaming? Such overt-the top anger response, plus childish nane calling, Yes, you definitely need to find a mental health provider.

          • Jean Langford M.

            PISS OFF YOU EFFETE SISSY PUNK…BYEEEE…LOL…LOL…

          • AKLady2015

            Effete must be your spelling word for the week.

          • Jean Langford M.

            OH IT IS..IT FITS THE PUSSY THAT IS YOU TO A “T”….BORING..SAME OLD SHIT NOTHING NEW, THAT IS THE LIMIT OF YOUR DUMBOCRAP IMAGINATION…YOUR EDUCATION DIDN’T ENHANCE YOUR BRAIN SKILLS MUCH…LOL…LOL…FUCK OFF TROLL..

          • AKLady2015

            Thank you.
            Your input is always welcome
            It says so much about you.

          • Jean Langford M.

            LOL…LOL…LOL…

          • Jean Langford M.

            YEAH ..AND IT FITS YOU TO A “T” DICKLESS…FUCK OFF “T”ROLL.

          • AKLady2015

            You got something correct. I am amazed. I am female, obviously, I do not have a penis.

          • Jean Langford M.

            THAT’S RIGHT DICKLESS…I BET YOU HAD TO LOOK DOWN AND FEEL AROUND TO DISCOVER THAT…LOL…LOL…DUMBASS TROLL….

        • AKLady2015

          Mentally ill individuals have always been banned from owning guns. The most important part of that ban in not mass shooters, but those who commit suicide.

        • Tiger

          Listen Jean somewhere you mistook me for someone else cause I never threatened you the man who threatened Trump I blocked. I usually have the greatest respect for all military vets from every war but I fear I cannot allow anyone to curse me the way you did for whatever reason.

          You made a mistake and I think it best we not communicate anymore.

          Ahhh not your mistake mine I posted to you instead of the guy I blocked. Anyway still can’t take the abuse sorry this turned so bad.

          • Jean Langford M.

            PISS OFF TROLL..YOU INITIATED THE PROFANITY AND YOU GOT A BLAST OF IT BACK IN YOUR FACE..YOUR DISHONORED RANTS ARE NOT WORTH MY TIME…SHOVE OFF TROLL…

          • Tiger

            NOTHING DISHONORABLE ABOUT ME AND I DID NOT USE THE PROFANITY YOU USED TO ME AND NOW YOU ARE BLOCKED MY MIND IS NOT GOING TO BE WASTED ON A FILTHY OLD SOB LIKE YOU.

          • Jean Langford M.

            FUCK OFF BITCH..WHAT A PERSISTANT DUMB ASS..GET LOST…

          • AKLady2015

            Miracles happen. We actually agree on something.

      • AKLady2015

        Had that happened, George would have been arrested and jailed. It is illegal to lie to the police.

    • AKLady2015

      CDC and FBI records clearly show that in homes invasions, it is the home owners gun that is used to kill them.
      Are you prepared to kill someone? Most people are not.

      • Jean Langford M.

        I DID 26 MONTHS OF KILLING IN VIETNAM SISSY..GO PEDDLE YOUR BULLSHIT TO THOSE TO HAVE “NO” CLUE WHAT VIOLENCE FEELS OR LOOKS LIKE…THEN YOU CAN BE CONSIDERED A EXPERT ON THE SUBJECT AND SPEAKING FROM (IN YOUR MIND) AUTHORITY..YOU ARE SO FULL OF SHIT…PISS OFF TROLL..

        • AKLady2015

          I also had lovely blood and guts vacations in sunny Vietnam — two tours at combat hospitals, as a surgeon;

          • Jean Langford M.

            YEAH AND YOUR MOTHER WAS A MONKEY…FUCK OFF TROLL…BULL SHIT…PISS OFF DUMBOCRAP LEFTIST TROLL..YOU LIVE WITH MOMMY AND DADDY..SUCKING ON THE WELFARE TIT….THAT IS MORE LIKELY FACT THAN FICTION…LOL…LOL…

          • AKLady2015

            Temper, temper
            Are you stamping your foot to go with the screaming?

          • Jean Langford M.

            LOL…LOL…THATS ALL YOU GOT DICKLESS?…LOL…LOL…FUCK OFF TROLL….LOL…LOL…

          • AKLady2015

            Did your mommy teach you that foul language?
            Oh, yes, it has been so long, I almost forgot.
            Your DI is your mother.
            They don’t teach profanity at OCS.

          • Jean Langford M.

            NO GOT THAT ON THE BATTLE FIELD..SOMETING YOU ARE DEVOID IN KNOWLE$GE OF..PISS OF DICKLESS…

          • AKLady

            I did two tours at combat hospitals in Vietnam.
            Hopefully, you are not one of the patients I saved.
            Save your sewer mouth for your drinking buddies.

          • Jean Langford M.

            NOPE…NO TANTRUMS..I LEAVE THAT KIND OF NONE-SENSE TO TROLLS LIKE YOU WHO ARE STILL SCREAMING, CRYING, RUNNIINNG TO THERE SAFE SPACES, AND USING THEIR “SAFETY PINS” TO HOLD THERE DIAPERS UP SINCE TRUMP WON THE PRESIDENCY…..PISS OFF TROLL…LOL…LOL…

          • AKLady2015

            However, it is you who are screaming.

          • Jean Langford M.

            NAAAAW..THAT IS ALL IN CAPS BECAUSE OF WOUNDS IN COMBAT TO MY EYES THAT REQUIRE CAPS SO THAT I CAN SEE…IF YOU HAD HAVE THE BRAIN YOU THINK YOU DO…YOU WOULD HAVE REMEMBERED I EXPLAINED THAT TO YOUR SORRY ASS LONG AGO…FUCK OFF TROLL…

  • bobnstuff

    I know a number of people on SSI and most shouldn’t have guns. Using this system as a check does make sense as long as there is a system to appeal the rejection. They will still get guns anyway since 20% of all gun sales have no back ground checks. If you can’t manage your affairs then a little extra caution isn’t a bad thing. Do you really want some one handing crazy Uncle Charlie a gun.

    • chw2000

      And you shouldn’t have a computer.

      • bobnstuff

        So you have no problems giving mentally incompetent people guns.

        • burns

          Just because they can’t handle financial affairs, doesn’t mean they don’t have a right to protect themselves. It depends on ho grave the situation is. I recently went through this with my mom, who is 96, and contracted dementia at 95, I would never let her near a gun, but if a father allows his son to manage his money for the sake of convience, then there is a difference.
          Some familys get direct deposit and pay bills out of one account, its not the same thing.

          • bobnstuff

            We aren’t talking about having some one handle your money because of convenience, we are talking about about having been found incompetent and having someone put in control of your money. Right now your mother could still go out and buy a gun unless she is in the system as having dementia.

        • Retired

          Next you wet dreamers will come up with is to use your credit score to prevent people from buying a gun. You sound as bad as Obama and the Clintons along with the UN.

          • bobnstuff

            My question is do you want crazy people to be able to buy guns? Do you want people who can’t remember what their own children look like or even their own names to be able to buy guns? Do you want the guy who is hearing voices in his head to buy guns?

          • Retired

            No respectable gun dealer will sell to them. You are sounding just like Obama – Clintons and the UN . Criminals will not buy guns legally . You would support laws that allow for home invasions to take away your gun.

          • bobnstuff

            And all gun dealers are respectable? If you can walk in show ID and fill out the form, pass the background check you have a gun. Twenty percent of the time you don’t even have background checks. I bought my guns from private owners. In this case I’m not worried about criminals getting those guns by buying them, they will just steel them. It’s crazy Uncle Charley who hears voices that I’m worried about. Those criminal can steel his gun. It might be safer. Oh and that home invasion you are afraid of, just make sure it’s a criminal you are shooting and not the neighbor checking up on you.

          • Retired

            You are really out in left field today with your sea stories.

          • bobnstuff

            Here’s the facts. You are most likely to die from a gun at your own hands, then next it will be by a loved one or a friend, someone you know. You are much less likely to shot by an intruder. Keeping guns out of the hands of people with mental problems is in fact more important to your safety then keeping them out of the hands of criminals.

          • Retired

            Well I think with your thinking and what you are posting today, you fit the criteria of having the guns taken out of your house. You are quoting the Democrats and UN along with the anti gun people.

          • bobnstuff

            You keep bring up the UN. You do know that nothing the UN as purposed has anything to do with controlling guns in our country but is dealing with gun shipments to terrorist groups. It’s meant to stop them from getting guns on the international market. It’s aimed at groups like ISIS not the citizens of the US.

          • Retired

            You should pay more attention to what all the UN is involved in .

          • bobnstuff

            http://www.snopes.com/politics/guns/untreaty.asp
            You should get your news from more informed sources. It’s an international arm agreement.

          • Retired

            You like the UN so much go live in Australia or Europe where yo can’t have guns . Maybe you will be happier there. They kiss up to the UN like Obama and the Clintons did.

          • bobnstuff

            Has anyone come for your gun yet? Wasn’t that what our good friends in the NRA said Obama was going to do. Also you seem to think that people in Europe don’t have guns. They do, they just aren’t as gun crazy as America.
            https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Estimated_number_of_guns_per_capita_by_country
            You will notice that Australia has 21.7 guns for every hundred people.

      • Tiger

        He is a dyed in the wool liberal shitbag.

        • AKLady2015

          Sewer language, so impressive.

    • Mike N

      It may sound good, but that is a slippery slope. It is one step at a time that leads to gun control. It is just like how the homosexual agenda started. At first we just needed to recognize them. Now we have them marrying and getting into our bathrooms. That is how things start–one step at a time.

      • bobnstuff

        I have no problems with Gays marrying, why shouldn’t they suffer like everyone else. Some of the best couples I know are gay and I have no problems giving them the same rights as I have. As far as bathrooms, who cares? Put doors on the stalls and be done with it. In Europe they don’t have men’s and women’s bathrooms, they just have bathrooms. In the long run it would be cheaper just to build one large bathroom with doors then two smaller ones.

        I don’t want crazy people easy access to guns. Isn’t my right to safety as important as your right to give a gun to anybody. I’m not anti guns, I own them, shoot them, and enjoy having them. What I don’t want is the wrong people from getting them, I don’t like people who hear voices in their heads telling them to do thing having guns. I don’t want people who forget where the left thing to have guns and I really don’t want people who can’t see who they are shooting at from having guns. If you can protect me from these people with out some kind of gun control more power to you.

        I may have a different view of thing, My father in law shoot my brother in law one night when he came home late because he didn’t recognize him. We took is gun away so he just went out and got another one.

        • Mike N

          The problem is who is to judge. Initially it may be done lawfully and fair, but then you may get gun control advocates in power where just a claim by an enemy may be sufficient to restrict someone from getting a gun. That is the slippery slope that I am talking about.

          • bobnstuff

            Some times there just isn’t any way to get where you need to be without taking the slippery slope and just be careful.

  • Bowserb

    It does not help the credibility of conservative news sources when they exaggerate or misstate facts. The two groups who will be looked at more carefully are NOT Social Security Retirement benefits recipients. They are Social Security Disability–a program famous for high incidence of fraud–and SSI, a federal welfare program. People who are receiving benefits they “invested” in for forty to fifty years, are not part of this new plan.

    • AKLady2015

      Actually, it is Social Security Disability INSURANCE. An insurance program that every worker pays into. AS for fraud, you have vbeen sold a bill of goods. A person who becomes disabled usually faces a minimum of three rounds of hearing and a wait of 5 to 7 years before being paid benefits.

?>

Keep the Fake News Media in check.

Don’t let the MSM censor your news as America becomes Great Again. Over 500,000 Americans receive our daily dose of life, liberty and pursuit of happiness along with Breaking News direct to their inbox—and you can too. Sign up to receive news and views from The 1776Coalition!

We know how important your privacy is and your information is SAFE with us. We’ll never sell
your email address and you can unsubscribe at any time directly from your inbox.
View our full privacy policy.

Facebook Auto Publish Powered By : XYZScripts.com
Google Analytics Alternative