Hillary Clinton signed non-disclosure agreement to protect classified info while secretary of state

by Catherine Herridge, Pamela Browne  |  published on November 8, 2015

On January 22nd, 2009, Hillary Clinton signed a Non-Disclosure agreement, or NDA, where she agreed to protect highly classified information, and a failure to do so could result in criminal prosecution.

“I have been advised that any breach of this Agreement may result in my termination of my access to SCI (Sensitive Compartmented Information) and removal from a position of special confidence,” the NDA reads.

“I have been advised that any authorized disclosure of SCI by me may constitute violations of United States criminal laws, including provisions of Sections 793, 794, 798 and 952, Title 18 United States Code…” These are provisions of the Espionage Act, and as Fox recently reported, 18 USC 793 subsection (f) is of special interest to the FBI investigation as it includes “gross negligence” in the handling of national defense information.

  • PLW

    Hillary seems to truly believe she is above the law and, like Obama, she will do as she pleases !

    God Help America if she is elected as President of the U.S.

    She will just carry on with Obama’s wishes to dismantle the American economy & freedoms !!

  • Jrmags

    If Obama wants Hillary to be President, then look for him to fire the head of the FBI James Comey before the FBI investigation is completed.

    President Nixon was removed from office for lying and covering it up then, Hillary is not too big to take down.

  • solog

    Everything is right there. I don’t see what they are waiting for, but I am also reminded of an article I read this morning that was alarming to me. Is it true that there are thirteen (13) identified Islamic State groups or extremists camps in the U.S.?

  • dmttbt

    Why haven’t they been arrested? because there is nobody to do the arrest. We do not have a two party system, we have organized crime.

  • dmttbt

    Hillary will be elected because our ignorant voters have put a Muslim in the white house for two terms and we have CNN and other media that is controlled by the democrats. People even will vote on the theory that it is time we had a woman president. Why don’t we just try to get an honest one, no matter what the gender or color. The crap about the media attacking Ben Carson because he said he was offered a scholarship, but the truth was that he did not apply for a scholarship at that university because he was going to be a doctor and not a military person. When he wants to know why they didn’t ask about Obama’s sealed records or his BS about you can keep your insurance and you can keep your health insurance and then that turned into he misspoke.

  • pete G

    Eric Snowden can’t even return to this country for exposing Obama’s (spying on Americans) and this bitch gets away with every crooked thing imaginable. Send her to the middle east where all her money friends are.

  • pete G

    Yeah Hillary Clinton did allot of things, SO NOW WHAT, NOTHING?

  • TaffyB

    As much as I agree that Hillary is a lying, greedy individual. Sadly, she’ll probably get away with this simply because of who she is, not what she is or what she’s done..
    If our muslim president, the DOJ, IRS, VA and EPA can freely and openly break the law while the liberal media watches their backs, I have my doubts that Hillary will do time.
    Now if she were a Republican she’d already be someone’s bitch in jail wearing an orange pantsuit.
    We must work hard to not allow her to be the nation’s next corrupt president.

  • Of all the corruption and crimes, and failure to protect American Citizens that Hillary is more than guilty of, this one she truly needs to do Jail Time over! She put the entire Nation and We, the People at risk with her “gross negligence” with her personal server! If Hillary is above the Law, then none of us have to obey the Laws! Complete Insanity!

  • Of all the corruption and crimes, and failure to protect American Citizens that Hillary is more than guilty of, this one she truly needs to do Jail Time over! She put the entire Nation and We, the People at risk with her “gross negligence” with her personal server! If Hillary is above the Law, then none of us have to obey the Laws! Complete Insanity!

  • Of all the corruption and crimes, and failure to protect American Citizens that Hillary is more than guilty of, this one she truly needs to do Jail Time over! She put the entire Nation and We, the People at risk with her “gross negligence” with her personal server! If Hillary is above the Law, then none of us have to obey the Laws! Complete Insanity!

  • M J

    Hillary for Jail!! – ASAP!!

  • Faithful American

    Put her in her orange PRISON jumpsuit!

  • pete G

    Jail this lying Socialist. She’s broke enough laws. She wants to share your wealth but not her own. Her and Bill are the poster children for greed. The middle class will disappear if she ever gets voted in. She is sick with the pursuit of the white house.

  • DocJimmy

    Some say Obowma can’t stand the Clinton’s and would like to see them go down. If that’s the case and Hitlery in convicted, she may not get the Pardon everyone thinks she’ll get. Even if she does get a Pardon, the conviction will stand. In any case, this is going to be her undoing. For all she’s done to our Country, “Twenty to Life” seems fare…

    • pete G

      Consider this, If he doesn’t pardon her she will open the can of warms that Obama gave her the order to have the troops stand down in Benghazi. I believe Obama is more responsible for the Benghazi deaths than Hillary and this is why he hasn’t thrown her under the bus yet. They both should face a court for what they let happen.

      • DocJimmy

        By golly; I believe you’re on to something. I would like to think they are BOTH starting to squirm a bit.

      • DocJimmy

        By golly; I believe you’re on to something. I would like to think they are BOTH starting to squirm a bit.

        • dmttbt

          They are not worried about anything. Too much money and power.

  • DocJimmy

    Some say Obowma can’t stand the Clinton’s and would like to see them go down. If that’s the case and Hitlery in convicted, she may not get the Pardon everyone thinks she’ll get. Even if she does get a Pardon, the conviction will stand. In any case, this is going to be her undoing. For all she’s done to our Country, “Twenty to Life” seems fare…

  • PLW

    She truly seems to believe that she & Hubby Bill are above the Law, just like Obama is….

    NO MORE SELF-SERVING LIARS IN THE WHITE HOUSE !!

    Obama has just about completed his agenda to destroy America’s economy & freedoms…

    If Hillary takes Obama’s job at the White House, she will just complete Obama’s agenda !!

    May God Bless & Protect the United States of America’s Citizens & Tax Payers from these corrupt individuals !!

    • The Redhawk

      As lomg as we have a ‘PROGRESSIVE” PAC @DOJ…..Well

    • Original Rebel

      “Obama has just about completed his agenda to destroy America … ” Not quite PLW – he still has to declare Martial Law before next November. And I have no doubt that he will do it, or at least try to. It’s going to be a telling scenario IF we let him get away with it!!!!!

    • BOC

      “Obama has just about completed his agenda to destroy America’s economy & freedoms…?”

      That was POTUS 43.

  • mohrri

    This WHORE should be imprisoned, but as long Barack As$%^& Obama is in power and their thugs Harry Reid (The Mummy from Babylon) and the rest of the Demo-Rats, that is going to be hard to do.

  • a flag waving AMERICAN mike

    Grizz mann there is that word guilty people love to hear May

  • a flag waving AMERICAN mike

    jdbixii thank you for the info on the codes. but the fact Hillary new of the attack that killed 4 AMERICANS be for it happen makes her as guilty as if she had shot them her self,to my way of thinking

  • GrizzMann

    This Agreement may result in my termination. May? Sharply worded agreement that limits any action? Like, I may have pizza for breakfast. Them again, you may assress me as, the ruler of the universe. May?

  • jdbixii

    “I have been advised that any authorized disclosure of SCI by me may constitute violations of United States criminal laws, including provisions of Sections 793, 794, 798 and 952, Title 18 United States Code…”

    This is either a misprint (“authorized disclosure”) or represents the prerogative of government to arbitrarily decide if the damage caused by “authorized disclosure” warrants prosecution. Every person who ever worked with intelligence information signed the same document, a “debriefing form,” but it was worded “UNauthorized disclosure,” since there are, obviously, authorities in government, a Department Secretary, being one, who make decisions regarding the disclosure of information, necessary for the purpose of bolstering the position of the United States government with respect to some matter of relevance, the facts of which may be in dispute. Presidents, obviously, have the power to disclose classified information, depending on the nature and whether it affects or reveals classified methods and sources.
    Within the past 50 years, the incidents involving the capture of the U.S.S. Pueblo by North Korea, the firing on the U.S.S. Liberty by Israeli warplanes during the 1967 6-Day War, and the 1983 shoot-down of Korean Airlines flight 007 over the Kamchatka Peninsula all involved the disclosure, both authorized and unauthorized, of sensitive information used to influence international opinion with regard to them.
    Whatever the criteria for such disclosure by authorized officials, it would seem that a consideration of the strategic consequences of disclosure would have to be carefully weighed relative to the purpose for such disclosure. People died in Benghazi because of a terrorist attack. It is the utter senselessness of the coordinated cover-story regarding the infamous “video” thought to be offensive to Islam, which, provably, had no relevance whatsoever. It is highly doubtful that people died because of the disclosure of classified information or a situational violation of the law. That war on terror is lacking in common sense.

    • GrizzMann

      It was,” any authorized disclosure of SCI by me may constitute violations of United States criminal laws. If ”she” authorized the release of the info, she would be in violation.

      • ken51136

        Hillary had classified information sent to her Private Server that was easily hacked by China and who knows who; because she wanted the option to erase any emails sent to her that she felt could be used against her late down the road. Had she used the proper channels for her emails she could not delete them without getting caught. Why else did she have her staff come in on a Sunday; work all day sifting through her emails; if not to delete what she did not want investigators to go through the first, when she was first notified that she was being investigated by the GOP. As Secretary of State Hillary was delivering US arms / surface to air missiles / etc. to Al Qaeda, and anyone who said they would oust Syria’s leader. This was the reason those in Benghazi died trying to get some of these arms back.
        Hillary said nothing to cover her own behind / reputation. Obama was most likely in some of those emails; so he wouldn’t want them to be disclosed either. Just another Washington Liberal Coverup.

      • jdbixii

        Not necessarily. I don’t know specifically what department heads have authority, after appropriate consultation, to release classified information for purposes of proving facts related to incidents. It may require the approval of all intelligence chiefs and the Secretary of Defense, as well as the President, depending on the consequences and repercussions and how the release of the information affects the security of those who provided the information in the first place, i.e., methods and sources.

        • SDofAZ

          Regardless of the authorized or not, she and BO lied about this and hid the truth for several years. And they did it strictly for political reasons to avoid a problem with the elections. After that it was to cover their asses.

          • jdbixii

            What is really strange is why the State Department, diplomatic personnel, would be involved in an, essentially, offensive operation (gun-running) which is military rather than diplomatic? Like the liberal perspective on law, the propriety of protocol seems to be confused.

          • SDofAZ

            That really is an interesting observation and likely the real elephant in the room. Something done in the dark this administration is still hiding. It will surface in the future. Someone will talk once BO and his administration are gone. I just hope as prosecutable events surface, the next administration will pursue it. There should be no get out of jail free cards for any of the BO minions.

        • GrizzMann

          She signed as Secretary of State. That is pretty high in the State Department, generally regarded an important cabinet member And fourth in line of succession to the Presidency. Could be considered a department head?

    • nonstopca

      All “classified information” must first be “DE-classified” before it can be released by anyone, NO one, not even the president can just decide he’s going to release something classified on his own, other wise their would be no need for “classified stamps”. Secrets are to handled as secrets by every one, including her….if you don’t you go to jail.

    • PLW

      WOW, you must be one of them there Lawyers… To be able to take something so simple and make it so complicated,

      just like America’s Income Tax Structure…

      No wonder our elected representatives are in Congress, they are All prior Attorney’s, or Law Graduates, and only they can understand all the Legalese and work around it !!

      God Help us ALL…. Wish they could just keep it simple (KISS) with plain old Common Sense. (Not gonna happen anytime soon)…

      • pete G

        You mean like the liar Obama promised people in 2008, Everything would be printed in easy to understand language for the people? What a POS he turned out to be.

  • TexRancher

    Now is the time to prove that no one is above the law! That includes Kenya Boy! Both are prime examples!

    • The Redhawk

      AND when is MSM…C NBC.. CNN and the pogressive PAC “POLITICO” going to look in to SHIL-LIAR-RY “funny Business ” with UBS while Sec State and how much UBS donated to her and Kenya Kid and the Clinton Foundation??? To avoid DOJ /IRS investigations???

      • podunk1

        Obama’s list of Constitution and oath betrayals, like Clinton’s, is endless because CONGRESS WILL NOT ENFORCE ANY LAW against him!

        The 535 highly paid, honored, and empowered Washington defenders have done nothing to stop the overthrow of Constitution and country by the likewise oath bound RINO/democrat majority! The fire of treason is burning out of control. Citizens must end it by due process in their communities, by their judges and courts by JURIES (not corrupted judges), and citizens who will throw any TRAITOR representing them out of office if they DON’T DEFEND WITHOUT ANY RESERVATION!

        Read Amendment 14- 3&4&5. Amendment 14-3. “No (oath bound) person shall … hold any office… (who has) engaged in insurrection or rebellion against the (Constitution), or given aid or comfort to (its) enemies…” Then read and understand “…shall be… supreme Law of the Land… and all executive and Judges in every State shall be bound thereby… Anything in the Constitution or Laws of any State to the Contrary notwithstanding” and “…all executive and judicial Officers, both of the United States and… States, shall be bound by Oath or Affirmation, to support this Constitution…” (Article 6) ends any debate or defiance by those under oath!

        • The Redhawk

          To summarize… Obama’s DOJ which is full of ANARCHISTS shall Never ENFORCE ANY LAWS ON THE BOOKS … THey just Enforce the Lawless Laws that OBIMBO MAKES

          • podunk1

            NO doubt about it The saboteurs within… number 1 US threats!

    • Robert Kite

      Sad, but both are way above the Law & Our Constitution! Tell the FBI to close down their useless investigation! They are not going to recommend any action against these gangsters!

    • BOC

      It’s hard to prove something that’s not true. You remind me of that stand-off between Nevada rancher andfederal government officials.

      The rancher allowed
      his herd to graze government land. But when confronted with the bill, he refused to pay.

  • Frank Miller

    HANG THIS LYING ” WHORE of BABYLON”
    OLD SARGE,’NAM VET,’68,’70

?>

Keep the Fake News Media in check.

Don’t let the MSM censor your news as America becomes Great Again. Over 500,000 Americans receive our daily dose of life, liberty and pursuit of happiness along with Breaking News direct to their inbox—and you can too. Sign up to receive news and views from The 1776Coalition!

We know how important your privacy is and your information is SAFE with us. We’ll never sell
your email address and you can unsubscribe at any time directly from your inbox.
View our full privacy policy.

Facebook Auto Publish Powered By : XYZScripts.com
Google Analytics Alternative