Intel community: NY Times wrong, al Qaeda links in Benghazi are clear

by
December 31, 2013

Nearly 16 months after the deadly attack on the U.S. diplomatic outpost and CIA annex in Benghazi, Libya, the details about the perpetrators, their tactics and their motives continue to get spun, bounced and reinterpreted like a political pingpong ball.

The latest player was The New York Times, which over the weekend ran a detailed article about what Libyan militias think happened during the attack under a sweeping headline that critics claimed appeared bent on politically absolving former Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton. The newspaper unequivocally asserted its reporters found “no evidence that al Qaeda or other international terrorist groups had any role in the assault.”

But current and former U.S. officials, congressional sources and outside analysts briefed on the attack told The Washington Times on Monday that the U.S. intelligence community’s assessment about al Qaeda’s links to the Benghazi tragedy has not changed.

The consensus, they said, remains today, as it has for more than a year, that Islamic extremists with ties to al Qaeda and its evolving North African affiliates executed the attack, which was preceded by some degree of planning despite being launched during a spontaneous opportunity that presented itself on the 11th anniversary of al Qaeda’s horrific Sept. 11 attacks on the United States.

“The intelligence community has not changed its position from Day One as far as its position of al Qaeda and its involvement in the attack,” Rep. Lynn A. Westmoreland, Georgia Republican and a key member of the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence, said in a telephone interview Monday. “As far as the intelligence community goes, they still understand that it was definitely al Qaeda-linked.”

  • James

    We all know what happened at Benghazi and we all know that the Clintons will stop at nothing to get Bloody Hillary as the democratic candidate for the Presidency. We also know that there are people stupid enough to vote for Bloody Hillary; after all they were stupid enough to vote for Obama. If they think things are bad under Obama, Hillary will make Obama look like a choir boy.

    • Ira Seigel

      “We all”?? Oh, you mean the folks who write and read this website?

    • Janice Dyer White

      Will we ever forget these words?

    • Janice Dyer White

      I think it is a close tie that is for sure. Hillary is ruthless and will do whatever it takes to win. I believe Obama is out to destroy our country. I cannot believe that 41 percent of our population think he is doing a good job. It just shows how many stupid and racist people are living in our country.

?>

Keep the Fake News Media in check.

Don’t let the MSM censor your news as America becomes Great Again. Over 500,000 Americans receive our daily dose of life, liberty and pursuit of happiness along with Breaking News direct to their inbox—and you can too. Sign up to receive news and views from The 1776Coalition!

We know how important your privacy is and your information is SAFE with us. We’ll never sell
your email address and you can unsubscribe at any time directly from your inbox.
View our full privacy policy.

Facebook Auto Publish Powered By : XYZScripts.com
Google Analytics Alternative