“I hope you understand President Obama in just the last few days has tried to reverse that accomplishment by taking the work requirement out of welfare,” Romney told supporters gathered in a precision machining factory in this Chicago suburb hours after he unveiled an ad on the subject. “That is wrong. If I’m president, I’ll put work back in welfare.”
Romney was referring to a July directive from the Department of Health and Human Services that would grant waivers to states in how they administer welfare. Five states led by governors of both parties have requested such waivers to reduce red tape.
The matter has caused controversy in the nation’s capital, withÂ RepublicansÂ arguing that such a move is not in the executive branch’s purview, and that it waters down the welfare reform agreement hammered out by PresidentÂ ClintonÂ and Republicans in 1996.
“Under Obama’s plan, you wouldn’t have to work and wouldn’t have to train for a job,” Romney’s ad says. “They just send you your welfare check.”
ButÂ DemocratsÂ have argued that the move simply gives states more flexibility, and note that any state that accepts a waiver will have it revoked if the state doesn’t move at least 20% more people from welfare to work than in prior years.
State leaders have long sought flexibility, including Romney, who in 2005 as governor of Massachusetts signed a letter along with other governors calling for “increased waiver authority.”
The Obama campaign went further, accusing Romney of not telling the truth and being a hypocrite.
“As governor, Mitt Romney petitioned the federal government for waivers that would have let people stay on welfare for an indefinite period, ending welfare reform as we know it, and even created a program that handed out free cars to welfare recipients,” said Obama spokeswoman Lis Smith. “These false and extremely hypocritical attacks demonstrate how Mitt Romney lacks the core strength and principles the nation needs in a president.”