Supreme Court won’t hear challenge to city’s assault weapons ban

by Richard Wolf  |  published on December 8, 2015

The Supreme Court’s refusal Monday to hear a challenge to a Chicago suburb’s ban on semiautomatic “assault” weapons keeps similar bans in place from Massachusetts to Hawaii — but not without complaint from two conservative justices.

Acting only days after two Muslim terrorists killed 14 people and wounded 21 others in San Bernardino, Calif., the high court declined to reconsider two lower courts’ rulings that the ban was constitutional.

The action, hailed by gun control advocates, signaled that the majority of justices agree with the lower courts, or at least feel it’s a matter to be left up to state and local governments. Similar bans are on the books in California, New York, New Jersey, Massachusetts, Maryland, Connecticut and Hawaii.

  • hbcark

    Secular humanism is in its power in the US. It is sad we refuse to learn from history.
    Secular humanist societies have murdered 170-million people in the last two or three centuries.

  • drunkenirish

    Obviously the Supreme court morons are full of liberals who want to self-inflict pain to their families and to themselves. The liberals need to be either deported to Canada or be in the loony bin for major mental disorders. These liberals are terrorism supporters and they will stop at nothing to continue to restrict our WILLS!!! They are traitors of the United States and they shall not infringe our Amendments, Constitution, and our Bill of Rights. They have ruined this country of what it stood for…….Freedom…..Freedom from communists and socialists……..

  • teaman

    The Supreme Monkeys are wrong again and refusing to hear these cases places the Monkeys in direct violation of the Constitution. The 2nd Amendment is extremely plain and if they heard the case and upheld it, that would be creating law instead of adhering to it……something these Monkeys have repeatedly done over years. I come to my conclusion from common sense, not perverted liberal lawyer double speak.

    • bobnstuff

      Are you planning to defend the Muslims rights under the first and forth amendment with the same energy as you defend the second amendment?

      • teaman

        There is a big difference!! Islam is a ideology, not a religion, that teaches and preaches murder, rape, wife beating, under age marriage, pedophilia and habitual lying. Oh, and their desire for world domination whatever the cost, believing their false god Allah will give rewards.
        They should be the exception for they can not be trusted with even a butter knife. France has finally learned this truth and plan to shut down 160 Mosques where this putrid ideology is taught and preached daily.
        If one desires to live in our Nation, you abide by our Constitution and legal system, and it doesn’t matter if you like it or not. Even with it’s short comings, it is still the best system in world……bar none!!!

        • bobnstuff

          Islam is a religion, based largely on Christian and Jewish faiths. Main stream Islam does not teach that murder , rape or any of the lie told about any more then main stream Christians do. The Bible also give you the right to kill non believers in fact that’s were it came from in Islam. Exodus 22:20. Much of the thing you say Islam advocates can be found in our Bible. Read the book of Deuteronomy. The Christians have spent 2000 years trying to dominate the world. Do you worship the God of Abraham and Isaac, so do they. As far as our legal system you might want to look at the First and Forth Amendments.

          • teaman

            The old Testament was all God’s doing in an effort to rid the world of despicable scum(false God’s and Satanic worship) in order to make way for a more perfect ideology later to be know as Christianity. The old Testament is simply history of God and what He was about and his name is Yahweh not Allah! Islam was born in hell… Muhammad’s own words;
            Islam in Muhammad’s Own Words
            Prophet of Doom by Craig Winn (
            is the best-documented, most comprehensive, presentation of Islam’s five oldest and most reliable scriptural sources. Ishaq’s Biography
            of Muhammad, Tabari’s History of islam, and Bukhari’s and Muslim’s Hadith, were used to reorder the Qur’an chronologically and to set its surahs into the context of Muhammad’s life. When this evidence is evaluated systematically, the only rational conclusion is that
            islam’s lone prophet was a ruthless terrorist, a mass-murderer, a thief, slave trader, rapist and pedophile.

            to research compiled and released in Dr Peter Hammond’s book,
            “Slavery, Terrorism, and Islam: The Historical Roots and
            Contemporary Threat”, Islam has shown itself to be engaged in an
            ongoing campaign to quietly conquer the world: entering a nation
            peacefully, growing in number and power, and then pressuring the
            system in place to submit to increasing influence from shari’ah –
            until all are either muslim, or dead.

            Read the statistics that

            (From Dr. Peter Hammond’s book, “Slavery,
            Terrorism and Islam: The Historical Roots and Contemporary

            Islam is not a religion, nor is it a cult.
            In its fullest form, it is a complete, total, 100% system of

            Islam has religious, legal, political, economic,
            social, and military components; the religious component is a beard
            for all of the others. Islamization begins when there are sufficient
            Muslims in a country to agitate for their religious

            When politically correct, tolerant, and
            culturally diverse societies agree to Muslim demands for their
            religious privileges, some of the other components tend to creep in
            as well. (Author’s Note: this is also notable, and on the same scale,
            within US states and cities.)

            Here’s how it works:

            long as the Muslim population remains around or under 2% in any given
            country, they will be for the most part be regarded as a peace-loving
            minority, and not as a threat to other citizens. This is the case
            United States — Muslim 0.6%
            Australia — Muslim
            Canada — Muslim 1.9%
            China — Muslim 1.8%
            Italy —
            Muslim 1.5%
            Norway — Muslim 1.8%

            At 2% to 5%,
            they begin to proselytize from other ethnic minorities and
            disaffected groups, often with major recruiting from the jails and
            among street gangs. This is happening in:
            Denmark — Muslim
            Germany — Muslim 3.7%
            United Kingdom — Muslim 2.7%
            — Muslim 4%
            Thailand — Muslim 4.6%

            From 5% on, they
            exercise an inordinate influence in proportion to their percentage of
            the population. For example,
            will push for the introduction of halal (clean by Islamic standards)
            food, thereby securing food preparation jobs for Muslims. They
            will increase pressure on supermarket chains to feature halal on
            their shelves — along with threats for failure to comply. This is
            occurring in:
            France — Muslim 8%
            Philippines — Muslim
            Sweden — Muslim 5%
            Switzerland — Muslim 4.3%
            Netherlands — Muslim 5.5%
            Trinidad & Tobago — Muslim

            At this point, muslims will work to get the ruling
            government to allow them to rule themselves (within their ghettos)
            under Sharia, the Islamic Law. The ultimate goal of Islamists is to
            establish Sharia law over the entire world.

            Muslims approach 10% of the population, they tend to increase
            lawlessness as a means of complaint about their conditions; in Paris,
            we are already seeing car-burnings. Any non-Muslim action offends
            Islam and results in uprisings and threats, such as in Amsterdam,
            with opposition to Mohammed cartoons and films about Islam. Such
            tensions are seen daily, particularly in Muslim sections in:
            — Muslim 10%
            India — Muslim 13.4%
            Israel — Muslim 16%
            — Muslim 10%
            Russia — Muslim 15%

            After reaching
            20%, nations can expect hair-trigger rioting, jihad militia
            formations, sporadic killings, and the burnings of Christian churches
            and Jewish synagogues, such as in:
            Ethiopia — Muslim 32.8%

            40%, nations experience widespread massacres, chronic terror attacks,
            and ongoing militia warfare, such as in:
            Bosnia — Muslim 40%
            — Muslim 53.1%
            Lebanon — Muslim 59.7%
            From 60%, nations
            experience unfettered persecution of non-believers of all other
            religions (including non-conforming Muslims), sporadic ethnic
            cleansing (genocide), use of Sharia Law as a weapon, and Jizya, the
            tax placed on infidels, such as in:
            Albania — Muslim 70%
            — Muslim 60.4%
            Qatar — Muslim 77.5%
            Sudan — Muslim

            After 80%, expect daily intimidation and
            violent jihad, some State-run ethnic cleansing, and even some
            genocide, as these nations drive out the infidels, and move toward
            100% Muslim, such as has been experienced and in some ways is
            on-going in:
            Bangladesh — Muslim 83%
            Egypt — Muslim 90%
            — Muslim 98.7%
            Indonesia — Muslim 86.1%
            Iran — Muslim
            Iraq — Muslim 97%
            Jordan — Muslim 92%
            Morocco —
            Muslim 98.7%
            Pakistan — Muslim 97%
            Palestine — Muslim
            Syria — Muslim 90%
            Tajikistan — Muslim 90%
            Turkey —
            Muslim 99.8%
            United Arab Emirates — Muslim 96%

            will usher in the peace of ‘Dar-es-Salaam’ — the Islamic House of
            Peace. Here there’s supposed to be peace, because everybody is a
            Muslim, the Madrasses are the only schools, and the Koran is the only
            word, such as in:
            Afghanistan — Muslim 100%
            Saudi Arabia —
            Muslim 100%
            Somalia — Muslim 100%
            Yemen — Muslim

            Unfortunately, peace is never achieved,
            as in these 100% states the most radical Muslims intimidate and spew
            hatred, and satisfy their blood lust by killing less radical
            Muslims, for a variety of reasons.

            ‘Before I was nine, I had
            learned the basic canon of Arab life. It was me against my brother;
            me and my brother against our father; my family against my cousins
            and the clan; the clan against the tribe; the tribe against the
            world, and all of us against the infidel. — Leon Uris, ‘The

            It is important to understand that in some
            countries, with well under 100% Muslim populations – such as France –
            the minority Muslim populations live in ghettos, within which they
            are 100% Muslim, and within which they live by Sharia Law. The
            national police do not even enter these ghettos, and there are no
            national courts, nor schools, nor non-Muslim religious facilities. In
            such situations, Muslims do not integrate into the
            community at large. The children attend madrasses. They learn only
            the Koran. To even associate with an infidel is a crime punishable
            with death. Therefore, in some areas of certain nations, Muslim
            Imams and extremists exercise more power than the national average
            would indicate.

            Today’s 1.5 billion Muslims make up
            22% of the world’s population, but their birth rates dwarf the birth
            rates of Christians, Hindus, Buddhists, Jews, and all
            other believers. At the current rate – and barring cataclysmic
            disaster – muslims will exceed 50% of the world’s population by the
            end of this century.

          • Glenda Jordan

            T/Y teaman for sharing this….very educational. You must of had bobnstuff @ a loss for words after the first few sentences and off trollin’ elsewhere lol

          • hbcark

            Islam is not based on Christianity or Jewish faiths.

          • bobnstuff

            Sorry you are wrong, Many parts of Islam are taken from both the Christian and Jewish faiths, is Islam the same no but its roots are based on the same histories and myths.

          • hbcark

            Your response is not worthy of a response. It is obvious you know very little about the good word of God. The Bible is no myth.

            Christians have never tried to dominate the world. They traverse the world obeying the command given them by Christ Jesus. [See Matthew 15:18-19]

            They travel the world making disciples, which does have a do or die option. God chooses those who seek Him first.

          • bobnstuff

            Christians have never tried to dominate the world! Why did my Great Aunt and Great Uncle spend 20 years in China preaching the Gospel. I guess you never heard of the Holy Roman Empire. How about the Spanish Inquisition? The Bible was put together as a tool to rule with. Did Christ preach to take over the world, no but it doesn’t keep people from trying anyway. For God and Country.

          • hbcark

            Interesting response: The Roman Emperor Constantine the Great (306-337) was the first Emperor to proclaim the conversion of the Roman Empire to Christianity.

            You’re Great Aunt and Great Uncle spending 20-years in China preaching the Gospel is a great dedication to following the command of Jesus Christ [Matthew 28:18-20], very admirable. However, their calling was to inform not to force the conversion of the belief of Christ onto anybody.

            God created the ‘choice’. Then He sent His only begotten son, Jesus Christ, to save us. Do you realize as a Christ follower we cannot save a single soul?

            Jesus answered, “I am the way and the truth and the life. No one comes to the Father except through me.” (John 14:6)

            The Bible clearly states why Jesus came to earth but “For even the Son of Man did not come to be served, but to serve, and to give his life as a ransom for many.” (Mark 10:45)

            Again, “Just as the Son of Man did not come to be served,but to serve, and to give his life as a ransom for many.” (Matthew 20:28)

            The Spanish Inquisition was established by Catholic
            Monarchs and was a forced conversion into Catholicism.

            Note, both Rome’s proclamation and the Catholic Church’s forced conversion into Christianity. Biblically this is a no-no.
            Also, the Catholic Church distinguishes itself from the numerous Christian denominations and vis-versa. Correct me if I’m wrong.

          • bobnstuff

            There are places in our country that you had better not let them know your are not Christian. I always have believed that many churches have forgotten the meaning of being a follower of Christ. Personal I try to live as Christ like a life as I can.

          • hbcark

            What do you mean by “not Christian.” I don’t know where that could be.
            I can’t remember when I was not a Christ follower.
            You may be right on your second sentence.

          • bobnstuff

            I have a friend that lives in Missouri who is Jewish. It’s not a place for a Jew. She would lose her job if it was known. Another friend did lose her job teaching a a college because she wasn’t a Baptist.

            I can tell you to the minute when I gave my life to Christ. Everytime I pass the spot in the road where it happened I remember.

Google Analytics Alternative