GOP Senators Introduce Tough, New Detainee Legislation — Gitmo to Remain Open Indefinitely

by
March 12, 2011

by Trish Turner, FoxNews

Nearly 10 years after the terrorists attacks of September 11, 2001, an influential group of Republican senators, led by Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz., and joined by Independent Sen. Joe Lieberman of Connecticut, introduced legislation Thursday that radically changes the way the nation treats military detainees captured in the war on terrorism.

The legislation prohibits civilian trials for those designated as enemy combatants, strictly prescribes interrogation procedures, restricts the transfer of detainees to countries where combatants have returned to the battlefield, and dries up funding for any alternative prison facilities that might be built on U.S. soil, effectively cementing the long-term existence of the prison at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba (Gitmo).

After two years of failed negotiations with the White House, Sen. Lindsey Graham, R-SC, an Air Force Reserves lawyer, said, “The time for talking is over. It is now time to act.”

Captured members of al-Qaeda, the Taliban or other affiliated terrorist groups could only be held in military custody, unless the Secretary of Defense certified that civilian custody was in the national security interest, a strong rebuke to Attorney General Eric Holder who had previously sought to try the mastermind of the 9/11 attacks, Khalid Sheikh Mohammed, in federal court in New York City.

 

“We’re saying, when it comes to Khalid Sheikh Mohammed (and his co-conspirators), we’re not going to fund a civilian trial,” Graham declared. “It’s the only alternative left to me,” the senator said, adding, “Putting them in a civilian court after holding them under the law of war for years makes no sense….And it says somehow our military commission system is not good enough.”

The Obama Administration this week issued an executive order that creates a formal system of indefinite detention for current prisoners and authorizes some to be tried in military commissions, while leaving the door open to federal criminal trials for others. But the senators gathered Thursday, all members of the Armed Services Committee, rebuked the president for an “incoherent” and “confusing” policy. Sen. Lieberman said the order “did not go far enough” and said the nation’s policy should also include all future prisoners captured in the ongoing war on terror.

“They ought to be tried in military tribunals,” Lieberman said.

The new bill would also require the Secretary of Defense, the Director of National Intelligence, the FBI Dir, and the Attorney General to submit procedures for interrogating a terror suspect. “It calls for a process designating a person like (Christmas Day bomber Umar Farouk) Abdulmutallab an ‘unprivileged enemy belligerent’ and transferring that individual to DOD for custody and interrogation,” outlined Georgia’s Saxby Chambliss, top Republican on the Intelligence Committee.

“Collecting timely and actionable intelligence must take precedence over the interests of criminal prosecution,” Chambliss went on. “When lives are at stake, we can’t afford to risk missing that valuable intelligence on terrorists plots or associates simply because the Department of Justice is trying to preserve a statement for use at trial.”

Republicans were widely critical of the Administration for allowing the Christmas Day bomber, who attempted to detonate a bomb in New York’s Time Square in December 2009, to obtain legal counsel, though the prisoner did agree to cooperate later.  Supporters of the Administration’s decision have long argued that providing appropriate legal counsel and access to federal court would be a positive symbol to the rest of the world.

The senators reserved perhaps their strongest rhetoric for the long-running dispute over whether or not Gitmo should be shuttered for good, once a desired outcome for both Sens. McCain and Graham, along with President Obama. As the Republican nominee for president in 2008, McCain drew fire from many conservatives for saying the prison was “a liability in the fight against radical extremism and as president of the United States I will close it.”

But Thursday, both senators seemed to embrace the idea that the prison would remain open indefinitely and blamed the Administration for that outcome.

“In a perfect world I would like to see it closed, because it was a symbol, particularly in the Middle East, of improper treatment of prisoners,” McCain said, but added that the Administration’s “incoherent, incomprehensible, and impossible-to-translate” policy left no alternative.

“Basically, the administration has thrown up its hands by the announcement that they just made, so we are going to live and operate within an environment that in the short term it’s not going to be closed. It is what it is,” the Arizona senator said. “Over time, I would like to see it closed, but the fact is, the environment right now, it would be impossible to do so.”

Graham was even more emphatic. “It’s not being used,” the senator said of the detention facility, adding, “We need to use the jail. We don’t have another viable alternative…We’re not going to close Guantanamo Bay. We don’t have near the votes, because there’s never been a plan to give people confidence to vote to close it.”

To read more, visit: http://politics.blogs.foxnews.com/2011/03/10/senators-introduce-tough-new-detainee-legislation-guantanamo-remain-open-indefinitely?test=latestnews#ixzz1GO4xXthJ

 

1 Comment - what are your thoughts?

  • Verus Langham says:

    This is just another fine example of political activism that should have been a given all along – why further burden the U.S. Justice system with the costs of trying what best can be accomplished by military tribunal. I cannot recall, but were our soldiers in times past who refused to put on the foreign uniform of the United Nations tried in a criminal court or by a military tribunal? Association? Perhaps none, but then again…… we have the world at large trying to tell America how to stay politically correct by caving in to their demands for their brand of justice…. but isn’t this exactly what separates the world governments…. the right to try those who offend their respective laws. Why, I cannot remember a single instance in history wherein a foreign power relinquished one of our citizens for trial under our system of government; and how they rage whenever we capture one of their own and decide to be “not politically correct” in their eyes. My hat is off to the good Senator McCain to rejoin the war effort by standing on the principle of what we the people desire above all else – that is refusal of the American people to house those who assail us and present a significant threat to our families in this country, and to try them at public expense. Those devils should first consider what it is they are about and who they are about it against.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

?>

Keep the Fake News Media in check.

Don’t let the MSM censor your news as America becomes Great Again. Over 500,000 Americans receive our daily dose of life, liberty and pursuit of happiness along with Breaking News direct to their inbox—and you can too. Sign up to receive news and views from The 1776Coalition!

We know how important your privacy is and your information is SAFE with us. We’ll never sell
your email address and you can unsubscribe at any time directly from your inbox.
View our full privacy policy.

Facebook Auto Publish Powered By : XYZScripts.com
Google Analytics Alternative