Kim Davis obeying orders in gay marriage case, judges rules

by The Associated Press  |  published on February 10, 2016

Kentucky clerk Kim Davis has obeyed orders to issue marriage licenses to same-sex couples in the months since she spent five nights in jail for refusing to do so, a federal judge ruled Tuesday.

United States District Judge David Bunning denied the American Civil Liberties Union’s request to order Davis to reissue licenses she had altered to remove her name and title or face the possibility of further punishment. He found that Davis has allowed her deputies to issue licenses to anyone eligible since September and that the altered licenses are likely valid under Kentucky law.

After a ruling by the United States Supreme Court that effectively legalized gay marriage last summer, Davis, a born-again Christian, at first refused to allow her office to issue any marriage licenses, igniting a national firestorm over religious freedom and civil rights. She was sent briefly to jail for contempt of court. Davis relented during the turbulent court battle, but altered the licenses to remove her name and title.

The ACLU, which sued Davis on behalf of four rejected couples, asked the judge to make her reissue the marriage licenses and order that she not interfere with her deputies willing to sign them.

Matt Bevin, the state’s new Republican governor, signed an executive order in December that removes clerks’ names from marriage licenses in response to Davis’ case.

  • Neal

    Politically Correct Bull Sh..!

  • 4USA2

    The supreme court cannot make laws! Show this country THE LAW, where it’s written, where it’s found, that Congress passed it, that would force Kim Davis or anyone else, to go against her faith and be forced to sign something she believes is against her faith. There is no law. Kim Davis ought to sue the police department for arresting her and holding her in jail. She didn’t break a law because there is no law; the Supreme court cannot make laws.

  • keith

    How is it that it became law?The supreme court only makes decisions on laws,they do not write law.Their decision that gays can marry does not make it a law,that is just making a final judgement of the meaning of marriage. So each state should have to make it law.That has not happened.So these marriages would still not be legal.

  • helensatmary

    And what happened to her religious rights under the Constitution. The Sate cannot interfere and they should be censured!

  • DOC

    She Needs to go away

Google Analytics Alternative